That's the main problem: who will translate this text to xml?
Is that really a problem? I can do it.
Good!
Will this tutorial be included at the place of the present script-fu
tutorial? It is big and I see it as an annex.
Julien Hardelin
___
gim
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Julien Hardelin wrote:
> That's the main problem: who will translate this text to xml?
Is that really a problem? I can do it.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-doc
I liked the PDF version, nice structure. Assuming the functions are
the same, etc., why can't be incorporate it? I don't understand the
length argument. It always comes down to " we are just a manual and a
reference, not a book". But then, the script-fu chapter should be two
lines: a link to
Den 24.01.2012 14:41, skreiv Vitaly Lomov:
I liked the PDF version, nice structure. Assuming the functions are
the same, etc., why can't be incorporate it? I don't understand the
length argument. It always comes down to " we are just a manual and a
reference, not a book". But then, the script-f
I liked the PDF version, nice structure. Assuming the functions are the
same, etc., why can't be incorporate it? I don't understand the length
argument. It always comes down to " we are just a manual and a reference,
not a book". But then, the script-fu chapter should be two lines: a link to
Scheme
I am impressed. Although I only have read the tutorials without trying
to write the scripts. The tutorials are well written. The examples will
be of good use to many GIMP users I think.
I think this tutorial should be accessible in some way to the users
taking interests in using scrips. Perh
