Re: [Gimp-docs] Decompose - crop marks

2010-10-26 Thread Kolbjørn Stuestøl
  Den 25.10.2010 13:47, skreiv Ulf-D. Ehlert:
> Kolbjørn Stuestøl (Sunday, 24. October 2010)
>> [...] It worked fine
>> when I used the "make ... draft" and then validated it and then
>> made the html files.
> That's weird. I get
>
>   $ make validate-en
>   ...
>   *** Validating XML (en) ...
>   -:55205: element figure: validity error : \
>   Element figure content does not follow the DTD, \
>   expecting (...), got (...)
>
> Please check, it's a bug if you can validate your version without
> error.
> Making html may work even with this bug, though.
>   
> Ulf
Corrected (I hope). Used your example.

I am not keeping a journal during my work, so I do not know where or 
what caused the "no error" in validating. Most likely I validated a 
different version of the file and pushed another. I copied the sequence 
from another side, but do not remember which. Hopefully I did something 
wrong during copying. If not there must be another incorrect file 
somewhere.

Your new  tag gives the html a better look than the former 
tag(s) did.

Kolbjoern
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] Decompose - crop marks

2010-10-25 Thread Ulf-D. Ehlert
Kolbjørn Stuestøl (Sunday, 24. October 2010)
> [...] It worked fine
> when I used the "make ... draft" and then validated it and then
> made the html files. 

That's weird. I get

$ make validate-en
...
*** Validating XML (en) ...
-:55205: element figure: validity error : \
Element figure content does not follow the DTD, \
expecting (...), got (...)

Please check, it's a bug if you can validate your version without 
error.
Making html may work even with this bug, though.

Ulf


[OT]
> To your add on: Perhaps the priests are shining all day too, but
> you does not aware it?

I think with "darkness" the author (philosopher and atheist) means 
their typical(?) topics, when they claim to *know* and talk with great 
eloquence about something which doesn't exist. In the daylight (of the 
"real" world) these statements are just empty.

-- 
Verdient eine Menschheit, die Trilliarden Tiere
tötet, nicht eben das, was sie dem Tier antut?
-- Karlheinz Deschner


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] Decompose - crop marks

2010-10-24 Thread Kolbjørn Stuestøl
  Den 24.10.2010 19:33, skreiv Ulf-D. Ehlert:
> Kolbjørn Stuestøl (Saturday, 23. October 2010)
>> In my copy of GIMP (2.6.11 for Windows) the marks came out in white.
and sometimes a mix. Some layers with white others with black marks. 
(The same foreground color).
> Same here (gimp-2.6.9.git20100427 on Linux).
>
> Looks like a simple bug in the documentation.
>
> BTW, your layout
>   
> ...
> ...
> ...
> ...
> ...
>   
> does not work; see
>   http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/figure.html
>
> I have my proposed solution attached.
>
> Oh, and please deliver a virtual kick in the ass of your editor's
> auto-format-xml plugin... ;-)
>
>
> Ulf
>
Oooops
I think it is my fault anyway. The file was written in Notepad++.

I'll have to give it a look as soon as possible. It worked fine when I 
used the "make ... draft" and then validated it and then made the html 
files. I'll study your attachment.
(My internet connection is at the moment very unpredictable, therefore 
the delay between my two messages).

Thank you, Ulf

Kolbjoern

PS
To your add on: Perhaps the priests are shining all day too, but you 
does not aware it?

___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] Decompose - crop marks

2010-10-24 Thread Ulf-D. Ehlert
Kolbjørn Stuestøl (Saturday, 23. October 2010)
> In my copy of GIMP (2.6.11 for Windows) the marks came out in white.

Same here (gimp-2.6.9.git20100427 on Linux).

Looks like a simple bug in the documentation.
 
BTW, your layout

 ... 
 ... 
 ... 
 ... 
 ... 

does not work; see
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/figure.html

I have my proposed solution attached.

Oh, and please deliver a virtual kick in the ass of your editor's 
auto-format-xml plugin... ;-)


Ulf

-- 
Priester sind intellektuelle Glühwürmchen:
Sie leuchten nur im Dunkeln.
-- Michael Schmidt-Salomon
diff --git a/src/menus/colors/components/decompose.xml b/src/menus/colors/components/decompose.xml
index fb24ead..2da0593 100644
--- a/src/menus/colors/components/decompose.xml
+++ b/src/menus/colors/components/decompose.xml
@@ -303,32 +303,37 @@
   
 Foreground as registration color
 
-
-  Crop marks		
-
+  
+Crop marks
+
   
 
   
-
-
+  
+Source image
+  
+
+
   
 
   
-
-
+  
+Cyan component
+  
+
+
   
 
   
-
-  
-		  From left: source image, cyan component, black component. 
-			  (Magenta and yellow components omitted).
-		  	
-		  
-			  
+  
+Black component
+  
+
+(Magenta and Yellow components omitted.)
+  
   
 This option is for specialists. It is related to CMYK printing.
 When checked, every pixel of the current foreground color will


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs