Dana Sibera wrote:
On 10/02/2005, at 1:19 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
I had no idea that GIMP could select a portion of a pixel. How is it
that it can select a % of the pixel?
It depends on the way you make the selection in the first place. If you
just use the lasso to select areas, then gimp will
On 08/02/2005, at 1:13 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to
remove the background. Although it appears that I have selected the
whole portion of the image, when I paste
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:13:50PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to remove
the background. Although it appears that I have selected the whole
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to remove
the background. Although it appears that I have selected the whole
portion of the image, when I paste it to new, I see missing pixels. Is
this a bug, or am I doing something wrong?
Point is, if I've missed some pixels,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to remove
the background. Although it appears that I have selected the whole
portion of the image, when I paste it to new, I see missing pixels. Is
this a bug, or am I
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to remove
the background. Although it appears that I have selected the whole
portion of the image, when I paste it to new, I see missing pixels. Is
this a
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:13:50PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
I have been working with selecting sections of a photo so as to remove
the background. Although it appears that I have selected the whole
portion of the
