Well now that really makes sense -- that might be a good wiki addition. So I
believe that this tool is working both as designed and as expected --
antialias does do its job when you fill a selection though. :) And basically
it can't do it's job as a rule when you stroke a selection.
On Tue, Oct
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ernie Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Budig wrote:
Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
path is
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:54 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I can confirm this bug. If you stroke using a tool (eg paintbrush),
the result is antialiased, so I don't understand why the vector
stroking isn't
Simon has actually explained this quite well already. The outline you
are
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Ernie Wright wrote:
Does something the user does not expect is the definition of a design
flaw
It's more like technically it does the right thing, but the user
expects a different result. Unfortunately there is often no clear
solution for these kind of
So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
path is antialiased.
Nathan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Ernie
Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
path is antialiased.
This is a good workaround if you know what you're doing and what effect
you're after.
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Ernie Wright wrote:
Does something the user does not expect is the definition of a design
flaw
It's more like technically it does the right thing, but the user
expects a different result.
Design flaws aren't technical problems,
Simon Budig wrote:
Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
path is antialiased.
This is a good workaround if you know what you're doing and
I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
Antialiasing is checked in the tool attributes of the Ellipse Select
tool. It's also checked in the Choose Stroke Style dialog.
Fills antialias just fine. I also get an antialiased line if I convert
the selection to a path and
Ernie Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
Antialiasing is checked in the tool attributes of the Ellipse Select
tool. It's also checked in the Choose Stroke Style dialog.
Fills antialias just fine. I also get an antialiased
Simon Budig wrote:
Ernie Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
You're not doing anything wrong and we know about this effect. Gimp
doesn't do anything wrong either, it just does something the user does
not expect it to do.
11 matches
Mail list logo
