Re: [Gimp-user] Install Gimp 2.0

2004-05-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my memory now is that there were so many things (plug-ins) that would need name changes for the new previews and similar changes. Huh? I have no idea what you are refering to. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing

Re: [Gimp-user] Install Gimp 2.0

2004-05-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i was trying to restate the following quote from a previous email in this thread: That's the reason that gimp-2.1 cannot be installed into the same prefix as gimp-2.0. It's supposed to replace it. Currently there's the temporary condition that

Re: [Gimp-user] Install Gimp 2.0

2004-05-17 Thread Dave Neary
Hello, Squareyes wrote: I have been watching the list talking about Gimp 2. and would like to try it. Good luck :) 1. Am using Mandrake 9.1, and will use rpmdrake, will these Rpm's be suitable for it? I'm not sure. 2. If they are suitable, is there any particular order I should install them in?

Re: [Gimp-user] Install Gimp 2.0

2004-05-17 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 18:03, Squareyes wrote: 1. Am using Mandrake 9.1, and will use rpmdrake, will these Rpm's be suitable for it? I think the RPMs provided by Xach is for Red Hat Linux 9 only. 2. If they are suitable, is there any particular order I should install them in? If I

Re: [Gimp-user] Install Gimp 2.0

2004-05-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GIMP 1.2.x and 2.0.x will happily co-exist. as will gimp-1.0 and gimp-1.1 and gimp-1.3 exist with gimp-1.2 and gimp-2.0, if you are like me and have little things from all of them that you want and a big enough hard drive and distribution that