Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> i was trying to restate the following quote from a previous email in
> this thread:
> "That's the reason that gimp-2.1 cannot be installed into the same
> prefix as gimp-2.0. It's supposed to replace it. Currently there's the
> temporary condition that gimp-2.1 installs quite some things into
> directories versioned as 2.1. This is supposed to be changed back to 2.0
> when gimp-2.2 is ready."
> restate it and suggest a quicker fix like a few others i have seen.
> this quote i pasted is not about a naming problem?

No, it isn't, there is no naming problem. Everything including the
"temporay condition" is completely intentional.


Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to