[Gimp-user] Installed but won't startup
Hi again. I compiled gimp-2.0.1 relatively painlessly, but when I try to start it from a command line, I get the following error: $ gimp-2.0 gimp-2.0: error while loading shared libraries: libgimpwidgets-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I also noticed that in neither my home or root directories, was the .gimp-2.0 directory was not created?? Can anyone help me out with this one? Thanks. .brad
Re: [Gimp-user] Installed but won't startup
Thanks. Running _ldconfig_ did the trick. .brad Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Le 23.04.2004 23:14:11, Brad Kligerman a écrit : Hi again. I compiled gimp-2.0.1 relatively painlessly, but when I try to start it from a command line, I get the following error: In which path did you build gimp ? /usr/local ? /opt/something ? You should add the path to the library in your /etc/ld.so.conf and rerun ldconfig or write a wrapper like this one (I suppose in theis case gimp has been built with ./configure --prefix=/opt/gimp-2.0): #! /bin/sh LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gimp-2.0/lib /opt/gimp-2.0/bin/gimp -- Regards - Jean-Luc $ gimp-2.0 gimp-2.0: error while loading shared libraries: libgimpwidgets-2.0. so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I also noticed that in neither my home or root directories, was the . gimp-2.0 directory was not created?? Can anyone help me out with this one? Thanks. .br ad ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Compile problems and GTK
Sven+x/ By hook or by crook, I finally managed to compile GIMP2.0. I still don't understand why it was such a mess, but I learned a whole bunch in the process. Thanks go out to both of you for your patience. As for GIMP 2.0, I started it immediately after I got it compiled and everything worked fine, in fact it looks great. But since I rebooted, I get the following message: $ gimp-1.3 gimp-1.3: error while loading shared libraries: libgimpcolor-1.3.so.24: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory The file _libgimpcolor-1.3.so.24_ is in /usr/local/lib and is linked to _libgimpcolor-1.3.so.24.1.0_. Any ideas what's going on? Thanks again, /brad. Brad Kligerman wrote: Hi all/ I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with RH9 to GIMP 1.3.23. It won't configure, and I get the following... [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# ./configure ... checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GTK+ - version = 2.2.2... *** 'pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0' returned 2.2.4, but GTK+ (2.2.1) *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best *** to remove the old version of GTK+. You may also be able to fix the error *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing *** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is *** required on your system. *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH *** to point to the correct configuration files no configure: error: Test for GTK+ failed. See the file 'INSTALL' for help. I installed GTK 2.2.4 and followed all the other installation instructions. When I check the version of GTK+ with Synaptic, it shows _GTK2 - version 2.2.1-4_ and not 2.2.4. Is this where the problem is coming from. Any ideas?? Thanks. /brad. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Compile problems and GTK
misfit-x/ Thanks for pursuing this with me. # rpm -qa | grep gtk+ The results: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+ gtk+-devel-1.2.10-25 gtk+-1.2.10-25 But when I changed it from _gtk+_ to _rpm -qa | grep gtk2_ I got the following : [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# rpm -qa | grep gtk2 pygtk2-devel-1.99.14-4 pygtk2-1.99.14-4 gtk2-2.2.1-4 gtk2-devel-2.2.1-4 pygtk2-libglade-1.99.14-4 gtk2-engines-2.2.0-2 Notice how _GTK+ 2.2.4_ becomes _gtk2-2.2.1-4_. Could this be where my system is getting gtk 2.2.1?? /brad If that didn't work, then there's a config somewhere that's still saying there's a GTK+-2.2.1 somewhere. I have another idea... REinstall GTK+2.2.1, then uninstall it. Then reinstall (just make install in the source tree you compiled GTK+-2.2.4 in, if you still have the sources compiled (ie. didn't delete the dirs or run make clean yet)). And see if that helps. Before I throw in the towel and go back to Photoshop, I just want to understand what my _/etc/ld.so.conf_ should look like. Mine has the following... /opt/lib/gtk+-2.2.4/lib/pkgconfig I would think it should be in /opt/lib/gtk+-2.2.4/lib instead? /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/kerberos/lib /usr/lib/qt-3.1/lib /usr/lib/sane Rest of this looks good to me. If you really really want to run PhotoShop, you can in linux using WINE (www.winehq.org). Runs slower but works - at least PS LE 5 worked for me. However, I would rather use Gimp, personally. You can still use Gimp 1.2.x but the new 2.0pre1 is really nice. :) ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Compile problems and GTK
Sven/ Just like misfit-x pointed out already, this is of course completely wrong. /etc/ld.so.conf has nothing to do with pkg-config. I would strongly suggest to take a short look at the man-pages before doing such changes. It certainly helps to know what files you are editing. Point well taken. In my desperation to get this thing installed, I got misfit-x's indications mixed up. I guess I will take a look at the man-pages, but I still can't figure out why I can't straighten this thing out, especially since I already have an older GIMP that works on my system. /brad. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
