Chris,
On 2010-06-25 02:54, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Philip Rhoadesp...@pricom.com.au wrote:
Confirmation of what is going on from the gurus would be appreciated!
It was as I guessed - the scans are in grayscale mode but the contents
are essentially a 1-bit
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote:
OK, so now the next question is: If the original is recognised by
identify as a 1 bit per pixel image, why doesn't Gimp keep it that way
when opening the file? At 300dpi there is no real issue with jaggy
edges - is it
Branko,
On 2010-06-26 00:54, Branko Vukelic wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Philip Rhoadesp...@pricom.com.au wrote:
OK, so now the next question is: If the original is recognised by
identify as a 1 bit per pixel image, why doesn't Gimp keep it that way
when opening the file? At
Chris Mohler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Leon Brooks
leon-g...@cyberknights.com.au wrote:
If the image is text or something else essentially
monochrome
Or image-mode, bitmap, 1-bit palette should drastically reduce the
file size. I suspect that the 'line art' setting in
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote:
Confirmation of what is going on from the gurus would be appreciated!
It was as I guessed - the scans are in grayscale mode but the contents
are essentially a 1-bit image.
Open a scan, do image-mode-bitmap, choose 1-bit
People,
I am resending this - the firsts attempt with the attachment didn't make
it apparently . . I can provide it if anyone is interested . .
On 2010-06-24 10:08, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Leon Brooks
leon-g...@cyberknights.com.au wrote:
If the image is text or
Chris,
On 2010-06-25 02:54, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Philip Rhoadesp...@pricom.com.au wrote:
Confirmation of what is going on from the gurus would be appreciated!
It was as I guessed - the scans are in grayscale mode but the contents
are essentially a 1-bit
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote:
What is going on with these size increases?
It may be that after rotation, pixels that were otherwise the same
color got anti-aliased and were slightly different color. This would
increase the image size. Can you show us
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:04:57 am Branko Vukelic wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, Philip Rhoades wrote:
What is going on with these size increases?
It may be that after rotation, pixels that were
otherwise the same color got anti-aliased and were
slightly different color. This would increase the
image
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Leon Brooks
leon-g...@cyberknights.com.au wrote:
If the image is text or something else essentially
monochrome
Or image-mode, bitmap, 1-bit palette should drastically reduce the
file size. I suspect that the 'line art' setting in xsane is
producing a grayscale
10 matches
Mail list logo
