Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-22 Thread John R. Culleton
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Asif Lodhi wrote:
 Hi,

 On 7/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  ... While this is a
  major draw back with gimp I understand the need is recognised and
  will hopefully be remedied in the near future. When that happens
  gimp will be laying the foundation for an entry into the
  professional arena.

 Though I haven't followed this thread from the start and don't know
 who said what on which issue but I do want to suggest you to try
 Cinepaint (16-bit Gimp) for 16-bit - it's here:

http://www.cinepaint.org/

 --
 HTH,

 Asif

IMO it is already a professional level product for web images. But it 
still lags other free products with repect to color model, color 
profiles and conformance to printing standards like X3. So it is not 
a fully satisfactory replacement to commercial products for 
publishers.  Work is proceeding in this area but the color model 
problem is a difficult nut to crack apparently.

-- 
John Culleton
ATTN Publishers/authors:
If you don't read you don't succeed.
Free short list of publishing/marketing books. 
http://wexfordpress.com/tex/shortlist.pdf




_
Need personalized email and website? Look no further. It's easy
with Doteasy $0 Web Hosting! Learn more at www.doteasy.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-21 Thread Asif Lodhi
Hi,

On 7/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ... While this is a major draw 
 back with gimp I
 understand the need is recognised and will hopefully be remedied in the near
 future. When that happens gimp will be laying the foundation for an entry
 into the professional arena.

Though I haven't followed this thread from the start and don't know
who said what on which issue but I do want to suggest you to try
Cinepaint (16-bit Gimp) for 16-bit - it's here:

   http://www.cinepaint.org/

--
HTH,

Asif
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-20 Thread Matthias Bodenbinder
Am Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:52:58 +0100 schrieb David Marrs:

 David Southwell wrote:
 Anyone...
 Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
 
 Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.
 
 Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality, 
 properly 
 calibrated monitor and a very good printer, I really don't think you're going 
 to 
 benefit from the extra bit depth. Probably you know this already but I 
 suspect 
 many people out there are under the mistaken impression that they're losing 
 quality if they use Gimp when really they're not.

David,

this is not quite true. Even without calibrated equipment you can benefit
a lot from 16bit color depth. Simply because the picture contains more
information. If you want to brighten a dark area of a picture for example.
The 8 bit picture does not reveal details in that area and it remains dark
resp. grey. But the 16bit picture will reveal details in that area which
do not even exist in the 8bit picture.. This is simply a matter of
information density and has nothing to do with color calibration. 

Matthias


 
 For a while I've been using Gimp in preference to Cinepaint because I felt 
 that 
 8bpc was good enough and well worth the tiny sacrifice in quality for the 
 massive gains in usability. But I was surprised to learn from a pro 
 photographer 
 friend recently that he forces his Photoshop down to 8-bits because, even 
 with 
 his set-up, he couldn't see the difference in quality. And he makes the 
 reasonable point that he doesn't want to be manipulating bits he can't see.
 
 --- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall ---

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-12 Thread scott s.
Brian Vanderburg II wrote:
 I frequently use the GIMP for patterns/fractals that are to be used as 
 height fields.  For this, it would be nice if 16bit gray scale was 
 available.  I figure GIMP will eventually have 16bit support.
 

Same here.  there are instances when it would be nice to use graphics
tools on 16 bit height fields.

scott s.
.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-11 Thread David Marrs
David Southwell wrote:
 Anyone...
 Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
 
Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.

Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality, properly 
calibrated monitor and a very good printer, I really don't think you're going 
to 
benefit from the extra bit depth. Probably you know this already but I suspect 
many people out there are under the mistaken impression that they're losing 
quality if they use Gimp when really they're not.

For a while I've been using Gimp in preference to Cinepaint because I felt that 
8bpc was good enough and well worth the tiny sacrifice in quality for the 
massive gains in usability. But I was surprised to learn from a pro 
photographer 
friend recently that he forces his Photoshop down to 8-bits because, even with 
his set-up, he couldn't see the difference in quality. And he makes the 
reasonable point that he doesn't want to be manipulating bits he can't see.

--- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall ---


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-11 Thread Brian Vanderburg II
I frequently use the GIMP for patterns/fractals that are to be used as 
height fields.  For this, it would be nice if 16bit gray scale was 
available.  I figure GIMP will eventually have 16bit support.

B. Vanderburg II

David Marrs wrote:
 David Southwell wrote:
   
 Anyone...
 Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??

 
 Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.

 Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality, 
 properly 
 calibrated monitor and a very good printer, I really don't think you're going 
 to 
 benefit from the extra bit depth. Probably you know this already but I 
 suspect 
 many people out there are under the mistaken impression that they're losing 
 quality if they use Gimp when really they're not.

 For a while I've been using Gimp in preference to Cinepaint because I felt 
 that 
 8bpc was good enough and well worth the tiny sacrifice in quality for the 
 massive gains in usability. But I was surprised to learn from a pro 
 photographer 
 friend recently that he forces his Photoshop down to 8-bits because, even 
 with 
 his set-up, he couldn't see the difference in quality. And he makes the 
 reasonable point that he doesn't want to be manipulating bits he can't see.

 --- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall ---


 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
 https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
   

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-08 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-08-07 10:33]:
 Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near
 future? or is it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really
 suitable for manipulating high quality digital images?

Answered in the wiki.
-- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-08 Thread Kim Johansson

Then it seems like it will come some day. ;)

http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq#head-455dd92a98eee71c3c35de7fd48065e75d3c92ca

2007/7/8, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


* David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-08-07 10:33]:
 Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near
 future? or is it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really
 suitable for manipulating high quality digital images?

Answered in the wiki.
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] 16 Bit files

2007-07-08 Thread David Southwell
On Sunday 08 July 2007 08:05:45 Kim Johansson wrote:
 Then it seems like it will come some day. ;)

 http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq#head-455dd92a98eee71c3c35de7fd48065e75d3c
92ca

 2007/7/8, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  * David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-08-07 10:33]:
   Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near
   future? or is it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really
   suitable for manipulating high quality digital images?
 
  Answered in the wiki.
  --
Patrick
Thanks -- actually before posting I had  tried a search on the wiki for 16 bit 
but got the search engine gave me no results - however- before I had a chance 
to ask you where on earth I could find it Kim pointed me in the right 
direction. Thanks anyway.

Kim
Thanks very much being so helpful  and pointing me precisely in the right 
direction.. it is appreciated.

Anyone...
Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??

David

Y


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user