Hi,
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GIMP 2.0 comes with a color proof display filter that uses ICC color
profiles to simulate a proof on your monitor. Support for such filters
is new in 2.0 and for the future it is planned to integrate display
filter modules better into the
Le 24.03.2004 14:28, Sven Neumann a écrit :
Hi,
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GIMP 2.0 comes with a color proof display filter that uses ICC
color
profiles to simulate a proof on your monitor. Support for such
filters
is new in 2.0 and for the future it is planned to
I recognize that Gimp is web-centric, and that enhanced
prepress capabilities are somewhere in the future. However
some of us do use Gimp for images ending up on the printed
page. And critics of Gimp and Open Source software in
general jump on prepress issues as a point of criticism.
In
John Culleton wrote:
I recognize that Gimp is web-centric, and that enhanced
prepress capabilities are somewhere in the future. However
some of us do use Gimp for images ending up on the printed
page. And critics of Gimp and Open Source software in
general jump on prepress issues as a point
Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone would have to develop the profiles. The way Photoshop
does it is by buying printers and doing test prints and gathering
colorimetric data. The GIMP developers are short on people who
have access to colorimetry labs, not to mention lots of
Hi,
John Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In addition to CMYK the issue of ICC color profiles has been
raised. Photoshop offers several profiles for e.g., coated
paper, uncoated paper and so on. It is clumsy to develop in
Gimp, and then transfer to Photoshop just for profiling.
What
David Burren wrote:
and need to be reprofiled regularly. Good print labs profile their
devices and provide the profiles to their clients.
It's not up to the Gimp to generate profiles, it's up to the Gimp
to use them.
My gf used to work for a large prepress company. They spent a lot of money
issue.
s/KAM
- Original Message -
From: Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Burren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GIMPUser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and prepress functions
David Burren wrote
Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My gf used to work for a large prepress company. They spent a
lot of money generating and validating matching profiles, and
they're not going to just give them to anyone. If you want them,
you pay for them.
This is silly. The profiles would be for
David Burren wrote:
This is silly. The profiles would be for their specific machines,
and would be useless with anyone else's (even with the same make
hardware, as the knobs and dials would probably not be in standard
positions). The choice of ink and paper stock are also factors.
I'm not
Le 24.03.2004 01:59, Sven Neumann a écrit :
Hi,
John Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In addition to CMYK the issue of ICC color profiles has been
raised. Photoshop offers several profiles for e.g., coated
paper, uncoated paper and so on. It is clumsy to develop in
Gimp, and then transfer to
The books all admit that Gimp is too weak to compete in the world of color
prepress work with the likes of Photoshop. Is there a currrent effort to
strengthen Gimp in this area? Or is it just to far a stretch?
John Culleton
___
Gimp-user mailing list
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 16:28, John culleton wrote:
The books all admit that Gimp is too weak to compete in the world of color
prepress work with the likes of Photoshop. Is there a currrent effort to
strengthen Gimp in this area? Or is it just to far a stretch?
From what I understand, is that
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 16:28, John culleton wrote:
The books all admit that Gimp is too weak to compete in the world of color
prepress work with the likes of Photoshop. Is there a currrent effort to
strengthen Gimp in this area? Or is it just to far a stretch?
From what I understand, is that
On Friday 14 September 2001 10:02, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 01:50:27PM -0400, John culleton wrote:
I know that Gimp is considered relatively weak in the prepress area. So I
pose the following questions:
If an image is created in Gimp, converted at the end to CMYK, and saved
15 matches
Mail list logo