Re: make install woes

2000-01-27 Thread Oliver Bienert

Am Mit, 26 Jan 2000 schrieben Sie:
> does anyone have any idea why the newest developer gimp wouldn't install
> correctly from source?  i can run ./configure, make, and make install
> (yes, as root) just fine, but all gimp does is install its libraries...
> the data files are build just fine, but not installed.  any ideas?  i've
> peeked at the makefiles, but it didn't help much.  any help would be
> greatly appreciated.  oh almost forgot... i'm on a pentium 266Mhz w/64mb
> ram & ~4gb of free space.  glibc & gtk+ are both at version 1.2.6
> anything else just email me.  ps- yes, this is the "latest"
> ddeveloper gimp (1.1.15)
> --
> Kappa [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> http://members.linuxstart.com/~kappa
> ICQ: 61836890

Hi,

I installed gimp 1.1.15 a couple of days before and everything works fine.
I run a Red Hat Linux 6.1 and made an upgrade to the newest libs (glibc,
gtk...) Also have installed Gtk-Perl-0.700 but I think, this is not neccessary
to basically run gimp. Are you sure, running ./configure finds everyting it
needs? Have you installed all else neccessary libs, e.g. libjpeg, libtiff
(upgrade) etc.? Make sure, you have also installed the development parts of
the packages (e.g. gtk+-devel 1.2.6-1 on my system)! Have you made an "make
uninstall" in the root dir of previously installed gimp-version or removed any
old rpm-packages, that have installed gimp in your system? Don´t know, if my
hints may be helpful, anyhow, hope you will be successful,

Cheers Olli



-- 
Oliver Bienert
Phone: 030-47475624
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by KMail
--



Re: make install woes

2000-01-26 Thread Jon Winters


I have downloaded the latest gimp. As root I did the following:

./configure
make
make install

First attempt failed due to some -devel libs that were not up to speed,
upgraded and then ./configure went off without a hitch.

First attempt to 'make' ended in a segfault after hours.  I did not note
the exact errors other than 1 2 and 3.  It was trying to do something with
the Gimpressionist when it went down.

I tried again this morning to 'make' hoping to get the errors for you and
it made without any errors.

Feeling lucky I fired off the 'make install' command.  It ran to
completion without any noticable errors.

At long last I launched the Gimp only to find the same OLD version as
before.  What have I done wrong?

Thanks in advance for any help.

--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/
OpenVerse  http://www.openverse.org/



Re: make install woes

2000-01-26 Thread Hago Ziegler

Hi Kappa,

I had the same problem when I tried to install a new version of gimp
without installing also a new glib and gtk. I thought it is not
necessary because the gtk and glib version was the right one.

But gimp cannot install if it has not a fresh gtk and glib.

I deleated gimp, gtk, and glib, reinstalled gtk and glib from CD and
then installed Gimp. It worked.

RegardsHago

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kappa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Gimp User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2000 14:00
Betreff: make install woes


> does anyone have any idea why the newest developer gimp wouldn't
install
> correctly from source?  i can run ./configure, make, and make
install
> (yes, as root) just fine, but all gimp does is install its
libraries...
> the data files are build just fine, but not installed.  any ideas?
i've
> peeked at the makefiles, but it didn't help much.  any help would be
> greatly appreciated.  oh almost forgot... i'm on a pentium 266Mhz
w/64mb
> ram & ~4gb of free space.  glibc & gtk+ are both at version 1.2.6
> anything else just email me.  ps- yes, this is the "latest"
> developer gimp (1.1.15)
> --
> Kappa [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> http://members.linuxstart.com/~kappa
> ICQ: 61836890



make install woes

2000-01-26 Thread Kappa

does anyone have any idea why the newest developer gimp wouldn't install
correctly from source?  i can run ./configure, make, and make install
(yes, as root) just fine, but all gimp does is install its libraries...
the data files are build just fine, but not installed.  any ideas?  i've
peeked at the makefiles, but it didn't help much.  any help would be
greatly appreciated.  oh almost forgot... i'm on a pentium 266Mhz w/64mb
ram & ~4gb of free space.  glibc & gtk+ are both at version 1.2.6
anything else just email me.  ps- yes, this is the "latest"
developer gimp (1.1.15)
--
Kappa [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://members.linuxstart.com/~kappa
ICQ: 61836890