David Holland wrote
> Hi All,
>
> I tried to remove a dust spot using resynthesize but I can still see where
> it was, although it looks a lot better.I was using this tutorial.
> http://dodonov.net/blog/2009/12/29/cleaning-dust-on-photos-or-in-gimp-we-trust/
> Any ideas?Here is the original
> http
Is there a way to do batch process of converting .jpg or .tif images from
RGB to CMYK?
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Hi David,
All this is too complicated. Just use the Healing Tool.
Elmer
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:47 PM, scl wrote:
> On 20.09.12 at 9:51 pm David Holland wrote:
>
>> I tried to remove a dust spot using resynthesize but I can still see
>> where it was, although it looks a lot better.
>> I w
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:20 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> > Is there any way to turn off the jpeg thumbnail
> > when writing out a file using file-jpeg-save?
[ ... ]
> > If it's being created by gimp,
> > is there a way to delete the thumbnail from an image?
>
Liam R E Quin writes:
> I'd probably
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 22:37 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> Is there a way to tell gimp to bring up ufraw differently,
You can run ufraw outside of gimp, not as a plugin.
There are also other raw camera image processing tools, including for
example darktable, although that has a really confusing use
Hi all,
I've got a script for processing a bunch of files which starts by
bringing up ufraw. I would like to have ufraw save the list of
modifications made before returning to gimp. (.ufraw file)
However, when gimp starts ufraw, it passes some option to ufraw which
causes ufraw to not display th
Hi,
When I add any display filters ( View -> Display Filters ) and quit
gimp the
>On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kfayejessee wrote:
>> So I have been working on this painting for over a week…
>Rule #1: Perform regular backups
>Rule #2: See Rule #1
>Sorry for the semi-snarky response, but it is a good set of rules and
>will save you time and heartache when things really go
So I have been working on this painting for over a week…it is VERY important
that I get it in by my deadline. However, I went to open it back up this
morning to do some work on it and…it only had three layers. I tried to stay
calm and closed the program and reopened it but a little popup came up
>Use imagemagick's "mogrify" program on a cpoy of the images.
Thanks for the hint. Just read the tutorial and it seems as if this is perfect.
>The best OCR package still seems to be Abby FineReader, which is
>commercial but about a gazillion times better than any of the Free/Libre
>ones I've trie
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 01:55 +0200, crouching_ant wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm a newbie and have the following problem: I have about 2500 screen
> shots in png-format. I need to convert them all into b/w-pictures.
Use imagemagick's "mogrify" program on a cpoy of the images.
> How could this be done ea
Hi list,
I'm a newbie and have the following problem: I have about 2500 screen shots in
png-format. I need to convert them all into b/w-pictures. How could this be
done easily? Furthermore (but I guess that will be the issue in another list),
I will have to run all these screenshots through an O
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kfayejessee wrote:
> So I have been working on this painting for over a week…
Rule #1: Perform regular backups
Rule #2: See Rule #1
Sorry for the semi-snarky response, but it is a good set of rules and
will save you time and heartache when things really go wrong
On 20.09.12 at 9:51 pm David Holland wrote:
I tried to remove a dust spot using resynthesize but I can still see
where it was, although it looks a lot better.
I was using this tutorial.
http://dodonov.net/blog/2009/12/29/cleaning-dust-on-photos-or-in-gimp-we-trust/
Any ideas?
Hi David,
this
So I have been working on this painting for over a week…it is VERY important
that I get it in by my deadline. However, I went to open it back up this
morning to do some work on it and…it only had three layers. I tried to stay
calm and closed the program and reopened it but a little popup came up
Hi All,
I tried to remove a dust spot using resynthesize but I can still see where it
was, although it looks a lot better.I was using this tutorial.
http://dodonov.net/blog/2009/12/29/cleaning-dust-on-photos-or-in-gimp-we-trust/
Any ideas?Here is the original
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14586608
Hello!
My English is not the best, so I'll write my Question in German and in
English.
I hope anyone of your team can speak German...
English:
I've got a problem with my MEDION graphic tray (MSN:5503 9347).
I want to draw in grayscale with my Windows 7 computer.
In Windows XP it was no problem,
On 09/20/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
maderios (mader...@gmail.com) wrote:
I just think that every user can contribute to the development not
only for bugs but also for improvements.
Every user can try (assuming that the project actually provides a
feedback channel, which is not a require
maderios (mader...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >You're quite out of your depth of knowledge. You seem to think you have
> >some sort of right to get what you want. You don't, OSS/FOSS doesn't
> >work like that, unless you're the one developing. FOSS development isn't
> >a democracy.
>
> I just think that
On 09/19/2012 05:44 PM, Stephen Allen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:35:06PM +0200, maderios wrote:
Print shops ask for png, jpeg or tiff, not psd
Maybe your consumer quick printer, not offset print shops that do
professional work. They want usually, PDF and/or PSD. PSD not being
their fir
There's half an explanation in this e-mail chain:
http://www.gimpusers.com/forums/gimp-developer/10891-run-mode-enums
But essentially, if you start your procedure name with script-fu- then the run
mode is implicit and you shouldn't include it in any definitions.
The fact that it turns up in the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:35:06PM +0200, maderios wrote:
>
> Print shops ask for png, jpeg or tiff, not psd
Maybe your consumer quick printer, not offset print shops that do
professional work. They want usually, PDF and/or PSD. PSD not being
their first choice.
> >Yep, and that's their right..
On 09/19/12 04:19, paynekj wrote:
> According to the procedure browser,
> the third parameter to pass to the plug-in-unsharp-mask should be the
> drawable id,
> but you are passing the image id.
> It's only working in your first stage because, by luck,
> the image id and the drawable id have the s
On 09/19/12 09:11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 12-09-18 09:37 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> Can someone point me to a list of constants usable in script-fu?
>> Things like RUN-INTERACTIVE, etc.
>
> I don't have a complete list but you can find some of the lesser known
> constants in my wiki at http://lo
24 matches
Mail list logo