[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 Compiling src issues

2013-03-17 Thread Rukiri
Getting Babl and Gegl installed from src was easy but I'm stuck which seems to be a common issue so here's my issue. [quote] checking for BABL... no configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= 0.1.11) were not met: Requested 'babl >= 0.1.11' but version of babl is 0.1.10 [/quote] I removed b

[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 Compiling src issues

2013-03-17 Thread gerard82
>Getting Babl and Gegl installed from src was easy but I'm stuck which >seems to be a common issue so here's my issue. > >[quote] >checking for BABL... no >configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= 0.1.11) were not met: > >Requested 'babl >= 0.1.11' but version of babl is 0.1.10 >[/quote] > >

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 Compiling src issues

2013-03-17 Thread Simon Budig
gerard82 (for...@gimpusers.com) wrote: > >[quote] > >checking for BABL... no > >configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= 0.1.11) were not met: [...] > No way this will succeed. > I checked but there's simply no babl-0.1.11 available. If you're compiling Gimp from Git then you also need to u

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 Compiling src issues

2013-03-17 Thread Chris Mohler
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Rukiri wrote: > Babl > git clone git://git.gnome.org/babl > cd babl > ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt/gimp-git > make -j3 > sudo checkinstall --backup=no --deldoc=yes --fstrans=no --deldesc=yes > --delspec=yes --pkgversion=0.1.10-git Um - isn't your 'pkgversion' flag e

[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 Compiling src issues

2013-03-17 Thread Rukiri
>Um - isn't your 'pkgversion' flag explicitly setting the babl version >to 0.1.10? It's been a while since I used checkinstall, so I could be >wrong though. > >Chris You know checkinstall may have been the issue as babl was registering as 0.1.11 after a clean install and doing make install instead