Gary Aitken and Alexander Rabtchevich suggest that Darktable (and possibly
Shotwell) are applying corrections that improve the display of the raw
image. This is true, but in Darktable you can select the 0 - original
image without the sharpening and curve correction and the image is still
very
Alexander Rabtchevich alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net writes:
When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any
corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was made
by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would made
with the original
Can you provide an example image to confirm this?
Thanks,
Partha
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small j...@cjsa.com wrote:
Alexander Rabtchevich alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net writes:
When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any
corrections, the program
Partha Bagchi parth...@gmail.com writes:
Can you provide an example image to confirm this?
Sure. Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern Sony format and
pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. Point your browser here:
* Jeffery Small j...@cjsa.com [04-05-14 16:15]:
Partha Bagchi parth...@gmail.com writes:
Can you provide an example image to confirm this?
Sure. Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern Sony format and
pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. Point your browser
Can you also put the jpg you shot since that tells me what you are
expecting to see?
As an aside you may want to visit Dave Coffin's page and read the FAQ
especially about gamma and linearity.
Thanks,
Partha
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jeffery Small j...@cjsa.com wrote:
Partha Bagchi
Can you provide an example image to confirm this?
Sure. Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern Sony
format and pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. Point
your browser here:
http://smallthoughts.com/photos/misc/GIMP/clouds.arw
Looks like a normal image when
Partha Bagchi parth...@gmail.com writes:
Can you also put the jpg you shot since that tells me what you are
expecting to see?
As an aside you may want to visit Dave Coffin's page and read the FAQ
especially about gamma and linearity.
The jpg images look very much like what you see in the
I'm frustrated by large storage requirements for xcf files resulting from
processing many jpg image files. The processing is typically pretty simple,
crop, curves, with no touch up. I don't mind the xcf size for images which
required a lot of detail work, but it's crazy for the majority of them.
I admit I missed your previous image and so apologies I don't know what
Darktable shows.
When I processed in UFRaw (version 0.20, my build and part of my Gimp build
for Windows 64-bit), It looks fine. I set the exposure to -1.48,
White-balance to Daylight.
If I play a little more with the
On 06.04.2014 at 04:52 A.M Gary Aitken wrote
I'm frustrated by large storage requirements for xcf files resulting from
processing many jpg image files. [...]
Are there any plugins, or is any work being done / planned, on some means to
save (even a selected set of) operations so the result can
11 matches
Mail list logo
