Can you provide an example image to confirm this? Thanks, Partha
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small <j...@cjsa.com> wrote: > Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net> writes: > > >When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any > >corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was made > >by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would made > >with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin UFRaw a > >camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the similar > >result... > > It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over exposed, > but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. The original > image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture was > shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I shoot > RAW+JPG). In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right edge > of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the picture as > most of the image detail is already lost. When I open the same file in the > DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine), the > raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked. > > So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have reported > it as such. I'm just confused that I have not heard other people > complaining > about this problem. > > Regards, > -- > Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
