[Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Joel Rees
I have a pdf of scanned images, theoretically jpeg images, and the gimp will offer me a selection dialog, from which it will import them individually as 1304x932 at 100 px/in. (This is odd, because I selected 300dpi at scan time, so the images should be 3 times that pixel density. But, then, 22Mb f

Re: [Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Pat David
The pdf can be exported at any resolution you ask. It's the reason you can specify which density you want on import. (Imagemagick has a couple of options for handling this: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=8707). What happens when you set the import density higher in GIM

Re: [Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Christian Mandel
For this use case, I would suggest using the pdfimages program (from xpdf I guess) (with the -j option to preserve embedded jpg) to extract the original images. The import in gimp will always "render" the pdf, what will always scale the original image, unless you hit the exact resoultion/size.

Re: [Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Joel Rees
2015/07/07 16:07 "Pat David" : > > The pdf can be exported at any resolution you ask. > It's the reason you can specify which density you want on import. For some reason, I was expecting that dialog to offer the actual resolution of the encapsulated jpeg image as a default. Would be nice to have a

Re: [Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Joel Rees
2015/07/07 16:55 "Christian Mandel" : > > For this use case, Well, actually, even IM's default 72 px/in would have done my present job. However, > I would suggest using the pdfimages program (from xpdf I guess) > (with the -j option to preserve embedded jpg) to extract the original images. this

Re: [Gimp-user] resolution, size when extracting from pdf vs. imagemagick

2015-07-07 Thread Pat David
Remember that as a container, pdf's can contain embedded jpg images at varying pixel densities... Christians solution would be the better solution I think. On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:36 AM Joel Rees wrote: > 2015/07/07 16:55 "Christian Mandel" : > > > > For this use case, > > Well, actually, even

[Gimp-user] New photographic tutorial (pixls.us)

2015-07-07 Thread Pat David
I know this isn't specifically GIMP related, but I figured there might be some photographers on the list that would find some interest in this. Over on PIXLS.US, the creator of a new image processing project, PhotoFlow, has just finished writing a nice tutorial on creating an exposure blended pano