exist,
> and another one is a very small point and a known bug, are enough for
> not having access to the tremendous new capabilities of version 2.8?
>
The basic use cases are the most important to me, as soon as I will have
a real need for the new capabilities of GIMP, I will rethink up
ful than
the current
or whatever.
- Making all the smart users ;-) suffer from the incompetence of a few
other users who are not able to use the right operation (although it is
there!) is like fighting fire with gasoline (or "Es ist, wie den
s to an error message... That's not cool, is it?
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
t;, requirement of the possibility to "always go back and
tweak things").
But it is annoying for straightforward light-weight(!) workflows: Open a
JPEG, manipulate it, save it.
This is the key problem.
Therefore I suggest to make the new "fool proof&
Am 01.07.2012 12:27, schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Johannes wrote:
>
>> Therefore I suggest to make the new "fool proof" workflow optional, so
>> everybody can be happy.
>
> This has been suggested before. The answer was "
rectly (after having
overwritten the original BMP/JPEG/PNG/whatever).
At the moment, "Exit (close without saving)" is a "two-step" step: Close
-> Close without saving
Or is there a shortcut I am not aware of?
Thanks to the developers for the great work (before and after v2.6.
ot;use another
software!" and "no") is "everything convincing has been said elsewhere".
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
GIMP mailing list
archive ("haystack"):
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list/
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/
- or Google ("needle finder") --try it with the
"site:mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list/" or
"site:mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/" options.
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
s to be adapted.
I don't want my changes to be simply reverted, because I would be a
newbie committer and others may like to play power games or something.
Don't get me wrong, I want to make things better, not cast perls before
people without arguments.
--
Johannes
Am 14.07.2012 19:24, schrieb Johannes:
> not cast perls before
> people without arguments.
...and no pearls, too.
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
this
behavior in the GIMP preferences, if there was any. So you could still
be relaxed and happy.
:-)
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Also note that when I gzip the XCF, it compresses by a factor of 1:10,
i.e., from about 1 MB down to about 105 kB, which seems much more
reasonable.
If you have insights to this, I'd be happy to learn what's going on there.
All the best,
Johannes
___
On 13.06.19 22:25, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> I've recently created an XCF template file that almost only contains
> large slabs of solid colors (i.e., no "picture"), couple of layers and
> layer masks. I was surprised to find that the XCF compressed this rather
> poorly,
On 14.06.19 10:49, Simon Budig wrote:
>> Well, I opened that and then saved it as a .xcf.bz2 file and it was
>> 10% of the original.
>>
>> Pretty reasonable to me?
>
> Well, yeah. But this is not what Johannes is talking about, he is
> questioning the performance
le somehow and has
evaded me?
Best regards,
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On 02.11.2012 23:20, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 23:19 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to "virtually" rescale layers in the Gimp? Or is this
>> planned? Because it would be an awesome feature.
>
> Not currently - if you want
On 02.11.2012 23:41, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
>> By "not currently" -- which question did you answer exactly: Is it not
>> currently supported or not currently planned?
>
> Not currently supported
Has
17 matches
Mail list logo
