Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:33:52 +0100
From: d.kup...@gmail.com
To: s.korten...@hccnet.nl
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] import vs open
We can improve programs, we can create better images but we're unable
to change peoples (un)thinking habits. Please imagine what
From the start of GIMP 2.8 there are rumors about Save vs. Export.
It is a change with the past, but that has happened more times by
changing versions.
The first version of the GIMP that i started (i believe 1.2) came up
with a single toolbox and nothing more.
And i survived all the changes
s.kortenweg s.korten...@hccnet.nl writes:
From the start of GIMP 2.8 there are rumors about Save vs. Export.
It is a change with the past, but that has happened more times by
changing versions.
The first version of the GIMP that i started (i believe 1.2) came up
with a single toolbox and
On 20-02-13 12:55, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
s.kortenweg s.korten...@hccnet.nl writes:
From the start of GIMP 2.8 there are rumors about Save vs. Export.
It is a change with the past, but that has happened more times by
changing versions.
The first version of the GIMP that i started (i
I apologise that my last message appear as writen by s.kortenweg.
Next time I'll pay more attention to what is going to be send, before
i press send button.
This bad example from Corel is my experience and i don't wish to speak
for anyone else.
Dominik Tabisz
2013/2/21, Dominik Tabisz
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
There needs to be an FAQ about GiMP which covers this topic and all
arguments to date. I too say, let it go.
WIP
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
On 02/19/2013 10:59 AM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
On 02/18/2013 10:09 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:06 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
Current File-Open makes sense as it is, at least to me.
File-Save made sense to people too.
But if GIMP is an XCF editor that can only save xcf
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
That Save/Save As has been established since the creation of the the
standard GUI behaviors is not relevant to the developers. It's not
professional despite the fact that the most professional tools out there
still do it this way.
In a
Now, the objective of Gimp seems to stay in the fields of amateur and
therefore to delegate the role of single photo$hop image editor for
professionals.
BS! I would posit that amateurs invoke DESTRUCTIVE editing techniques(because
they don't know any better) while professionals do the
Is it time to have Import for non-xcf files?
How about
* File-Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
file brings up a message, myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
to import it?
* File-Import behaves as open as layers today, unless the image
is not dirty, in
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
* File-Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
file brings up a message, myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
to import it?
Current File-Open makes sense as it is, at least to me. After a
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
* File-Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
file brings up a message, myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
to import
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:06 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
Current File-Open makes sense as it is, at least to me.
File-Save made sense to people too.
But if GIMP is an XCF editor that can only save xcf files, being able to
open non-xcf files is an obvious bug, a hole in the metaphor. It should
From: l...@holoweb.net
To: cr33...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:09:30 -0500
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] import vs open
Or I wasn't clear, I think. It's not really clean vs. dirty, but
whether the canvas is new and unused and empty. E.g. try
14 matches
Mail list logo
