Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp & CinePaint

2004-05-04 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
As for me, the author is nor polite nor impartial. He critisizes GIMP all the time but he don't even mention any GIMP advantages. Sometimes he even hides the facts: on the new GIMP GTK+-2 and look and work under Windows. He says several times GIMP cannot handle files larger than web graphics. A

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshots

2004-05-04 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Sven Sven Neumann wrote: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I was just looking for some nice looking screenshots to show off on the GUADEC GIMP pages, and the best ones are all on developer.gimp.org The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots of the 1.3.x developme

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshots

2004-05-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots > > of the 1.3.x development version. Most of them clearly don't look like > > 2.0. It shouldn't be too difficult to redo these shots with an > > uptodate version. I am sure people

Re: [Gimp-user] picture orientation

2004-05-04 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 03-May-2004 at 23:01 +0200, David Neary wrote: > > When you open the image in the GIMP, that information is not used > before presenting the image. And when you rotate the image, the > exif header is not modified. So when you save your jpg again, the > same exif header (saying that the imag

Re: [Gimp-user] picture orientation

2004-05-04 Thread Jean-Luc
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote: > As mentioned, the exif header info in the jpg is telling kuickshow how to > rotate the image. After editing in Gimp, you can use "jpegtran" to change the > exif info (to not rotate). > jpegtran -rotate 90 file.jpg > newf

[Gimp-user] CinePaint and Gimp

2004-05-04 Thread Sigmascape1
> >There's an interesting article about the GIMP, CinePaint, and the CinePaint >developers here: > >http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/04/29/cinepaint.html Thanks for pointing this article out. I missed it completely. Rowe and his gang have done super work on this project. The really

[Gimp-user] MacGIMP Ad in the May-June Issue of MacDesign Magazine

2004-05-04 Thread Sigmascape1
Hi, I just got the latest issue of MacDesign, and was startled to see a MacGIMP ad. Fantastic! Open Source is making some serious noise! Love it! Mitch Featherston ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/list

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshots

2004-05-04 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Branko, Branko Collin wrote: On 4 May 2004, at 0:01, David Neary wrote: It would be really cool to have lots & lots of screenshots of the GIMP on www.gimp.org. Could someone from the web team take responsibility for this and publish an e-mail address where screenshots can be sent to be included

[Gimp-user] Toolbox area ? whats it for ?

2004-05-04 Thread Dave S
OK I know this is a stupid Gimp2 question - When I start gimp 2 (ps its amazing) I get the toolbox & a large blank area underneath it. What is this area for ? I assume you can drag menus into it but no matter what I try I can't get anything to drag & drop there. Dave PS I did search the on boa

[Gimp-user] Gimp 2 & Epson Scanners

2004-05-04 Thread John Dietsch
First my system: Kernel 2.6.5 should work with 2.6.3 or newer Fedora 2 test 3 Fedora 2 stable should be out by end of month Gimp 2.0.1 libusb-0.1.8 sane-backends-1.0.13 sane-frontends-1.0.11 xsane-gimp-0.92 sane-backends-devel-1.0.13 xsane-0.92 Epson Perfection 610 usb execute sane-find-scanner

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp on Slashdot

2004-05-04 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: 02 May 2004 01:04:36 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Nonexistent Entity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Gimp Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp on Slashdot > > Hi, > > "Nonexistent Entity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp on Slashdot

2004-05-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How many more of these articles must be written before the Gimp > developers accept that simple drawing tools are a must for a certain > type of user? We accepted this fact a long time ago. Pointing at it again doesn't hurt but in the end someone nee