On Saturday 31 January 2009, John Culleton wrote:
> If the Gimp source distro contained a compatible version of gegl and
> babl then compiling from source would be a lot easier. Now my only
> other choice is to install Ubuntu or whatever on another partition and
> see if they have an updated binar
On Friday 16 January 2009 11:42:42 am phanisvara das wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 21:52:41 Cristian Secară wrote:
> > My comment was related to „the easiest way would be to upgrade to
> > Ubuntu 8.10” statement, given as a solution to be able to use a
> > newer version of an application (no m
On Friday 16 January 2009 21:52:41 Cristian Secară wrote:
> My comment was related to „the easiest way would be to upgrade to
> Ubuntu 8.10” statement, given as a solution to be able to use a newer
> version of an application (no matter which). This is something I
> consider to be exaggerated.
dep
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:17:53 -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> its not the Gimp team's job to package things.
Of course it is not.
My comment was related to „the easiest way would be to upgrade to
Ubuntu 8.10” statement, given as a solution to be able to use a newer
version of an application (no matt
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Mark J. Reed"
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:14:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp latest version
To: Cristian Secară , Claus Cyrny
its not the Gimp team's job to package things. If you let Ubuntu do
it for you, then you have to accept the limitatio
