Re: [Gimp-user] suddenly can't load .pnm's from xsane, have before

2003-06-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 13 June 2003 20:38, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Friday 13 June 2003 20:12, Sven Neumann wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> And now the gimp (1.2.3 according to the help screen) cannot load
>>> them, any of them, claiming something is out of range.
>>>
>>> PNM: invalid maximum value
>>
>>The PNM files either specify a maximum value of 0 (unlikely) or
>> larger than 255. The latter is not actually invalid but not
>> supported by the GIMP PNM plug-in. You can easily check your files
>> by looking at them in a text editor. The PNM family of file
>> formats has a human readable header which is explained in the
>> ppm(5) man-page.
>>
>>> So what do I do to fix this?  I made the mistake of telling the
>>> missus it was a piece of cake :(
>>
>>Well, adding support for 2-byte per channel PNM files to the
>> plug-in would be a piece of cake for any half-way experienced C
>> hacker. If you don't fit into that category, why don't you use
>> xsane directly from The GIMP instead of going through PNM files?
>> Alternatively you could use one of the file formats that XSane
>> supports (like PNG).
>
>That has apparently taken a vacation here.
>
>Humm, I thought I had that working, but its apparently an older
>version of that plugin, xsane asks me to accept the license, then
>scans, but doesn't find any devices.  xsane itself runs just fine
>from an applet icon.  Or there are rpm leftovers of xsane.  Yup, it
>says its 0.84, and I have the 0.91 tarballs installed.  ^%%$%$
>up2date, I thought I had it trained, but its a forgetfull puppy.
>But rpm -qa|grep xsane comes up blank so I cannot blame it on
> up2date.
>
>Where is that puppy?, I'll nuke it and replace it with the lastest
>xsane-0.91 pluggin. I assume its still sitting in the src dir for
>xsane-0.91.


Humm, on second check, I have the sane 1.10, and xsane-0.90 stuff 
installed here.  I nuked the /usr/bin/xsane-gimp file so gimp can't 
find the xsane launcher now, but 2 make cleans, 2 make distcleanss, 2 
reconfigures of xsane which report that the plugin is enabled, and 
two makes and installs have not re-installed that plugin.  And 
according to locate, that xsane-gimp file was a unique name.  So I've 
no idea howto force an install of the new plugin for xsane-0.90.

Did anyone else have a similar problem?

>Thanks, Sven

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] suddenly can't load .pnm's from xsane, have before

2003-06-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 13 June 2003 20:12, Sven Neumann wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And now the gimp (1.2.3 according to the help screen) cannot load
>> them, any of them, claiming something is out of range.
>>
>> PNM: invalid maximum value
>
>The PNM files either specify a maximum value of 0 (unlikely) or
> larger than 255. The latter is not actually invalid but not
> supported by the GIMP PNM plug-in. You can easily check your files
> by looking at them in a text editor. The PNM family of file formats
> has a human readable header which is explained in the ppm(5)
> man-page.
>
>> So what do I do to fix this?  I made the mistake of telling the
>> missus it was a piece of cake :(
>
>Well, adding support for 2-byte per channel PNM files to the plug-in
>would be a piece of cake for any half-way experienced C hacker. If
> you don't fit into that category, why don't you use xsane directly
> from The GIMP instead of going through PNM files? Alternatively you
> could use one of the file formats that XSane supports (like PNG).
>

That has apparently taken a vacation here.

Humm, I thought I had that working, but its apparently an older 
version of that plugin, xsane asks me to accept the license, then 
scans, but doesn't find any devices.  xsane itself runs just fine 
from an applet icon.  Or there are rpm leftovers of xsane.  Yup, it 
says its 0.84, and I have the 0.91 tarballs installed.  ^%%$%$ 
up2date, I thought I had it trained, but its a forgetfull puppy.
But rpm -qa|grep xsane comes up blank so I cannot blame it on up2date.

Where is that puppy?, I'll nuke it and replace it with the lastest 
xsane-0.91 pluggin. I assume its still sitting in the src dir for 
xsane-0.91.

Thanks, Sven

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] suddenly can't load .pnm's from xsane, have before

2003-06-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> And now the gimp (1.2.3 according to the help screen) cannot load 
> them, any of them, claiming something is out of range.
>
> PNM: invalid maximum value

The PNM files either specify a maximum value of 0 (unlikely) or larger
than 255. The latter is not actually invalid but not supported by the
GIMP PNM plug-in. You can easily check your files by looking at them
in a text editor. The PNM family of file formats has a human readable
header which is explained in the ppm(5) man-page.

> So what do I do to fix this?  I made the mistake of telling the missus 
> it was a piece of cake :(

Well, adding support for 2-byte per channel PNM files to the plug-in
would be a piece of cake for any half-way experienced C hacker. If you
don't fit into that category, why don't you use xsane directly from
The GIMP instead of going through PNM files? Alternatively you could
use one of the file formats that XSane supports (like PNG).



Sven

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] suddenly can't load .pnm's from xsane, have before

2003-06-13 Thread Gene Heskett
Hi all;

First, let me state that I am no-where near a gimp power user, so 
don't confuse me with somebody who might know what they are doing.

The missus has been watching one of those tv shows where the lady 
making the quilt is using her scanner to get the patterns into the 
computer for her tweaking pleasure.  So I thought, how difficult is 
this gonna be since I've had this scanner and keep sane pretty well 
uptodate from tarballs.

So I dropped her background pattern on the scanner, a checkered tea 
towel sort of cotton rag, followed by the mini teacups and saucers I 
was going to plant in the middle of the background pattern to make 
her up some reproducable block patterns from some stuff she got that 
can be run thru an inkjet printer and then cutup for quilting pieces.

Yeah, sure.  I done this many times and usually load the result up 
into gimp to adjust and or print.  But the material has always been 
flat before, not 3d & a long ways from the scanner glass like a 
childs teacup turned upside down, with its saucer on top of it.  And 
a black book on top of that since the scanner lid obviously isn't 
gonna close on a 3" high object.

But in making the images visually usefull, I had to peg the xsane 
gamma slider all the way to 3, and diddle the britness and contrast 
up a ways since these cup and saucer things were about 2.5" tall & 
therefore hitting a quite wide density range in the raw images.

They actually looked pretty good, although elongated vertically by 
about 20%, something I figured one of our gfx proggies could fix.

And now the gimp (1.2.3 according to the help screen) cannot load 
them, any of them, claiming something is out of range.

PNM: invalid maximum value

and followed by a failure advisory window on top of that one.

So what do I do to fix this?  I made the mistake of telling the missus 
it was a piece of cake :(

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user