On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:41 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Sooner or later GIMP will not any longer load all data files and it
> will provide categories to organize them and all that. This is already
> planned and it might even come into existence to some extent for GIMP
> 2.4.
Cool, thanks - that'
Hi,
michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does that actually reload them? If so, then it sounds feisable, if
> you write a utility (e.g. in perl or something else with a GUI and
> shell manipulation capabilities) to switch these directories in and
> out. [I'm not sure typing ln -s /dir/ /
On 7/2/05, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sound logical, except if I recall correctly The GIMP loads brushes,
> > patterns etc. on startup.
>
> What keeps you from pressing the Refresh button in the brushes and/or
> patterns dial
Hi,
michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sound logical, except if I recall correctly The GIMP loads brushes,
> patterns etc. on startup.
What keeps you from pressing the Refresh button in the brushes and/or
patterns dialog?
Sven
___
Gimp-user
On 7/1/05, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Von: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:53:56PM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
>
> > > when you want to apply other surfaces, you need to restart the
> > > application - and that's what I think its not accep
> Von: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:53:56PM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
> > when you want to apply other surfaces, you need to restart the
> > application - and that's what I think its not acceptable.
> >
> well, what were you using and is this still an option t
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:53:56PM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:42 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:48:02AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> > >
> > > > the only drawback is that the gimp
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 07:30:45AM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 6/30/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That said, The GIMP technically *shouldn't* load *all* of it's brushes
> on startup, should it? (At least not when a user has this many
> brushes and patterns.) Like there sho
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:42 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:48:02AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> >
> > > the only drawback is that the gimp will not work well this way without a
> > > little work on your part. me
On 6/30/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and even with other current software that is available to me, i am still
> asking the question "what is the reason you need to get a whole freaking
> office suite and install it so that you can simply read a file that ends
> in .doc?" oh, the
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:48:02AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > the only drawback is that the gimp will not work well this way without a
> > little work on your part. meaning that the directories are not
> > available until gimp is re
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> the only drawback is that the gimp will not work well this way without a
> little work on your part. meaning that the directories are not
> available until gimp is restarted.
>
> all of the tools are there to manage your resources however.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:11:42PM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote:
>
> The problem is that whenever I start TheGimp it takes so much time to
> load
> that it eventually crashes my machine every time.
> The disks start to trash and everything comes to a halt.
> My setup is a amd64 3500+ with 1GB ram a
13 matches
Mail list logo
