Junio C Hamano wrote:
I actually tried to reorder the patches and they seem to work OK as
expected. And I think it makes sense to order them the way I've
been suggesting, so I'll tentatively queue the result of reordering
on 'rr/rebase-checkout-reflog' and push it out as a part of 'pu'.
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Thanks for the reorder and commit message tweaks. I'm working on the
series you put up on `pu` now.
That said, I do not agree with one of your commit message updates:
checkout: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
GIT_REFLOG_ACTION is an environment variable
Junio C Hamano wrote:
diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
index a58406d..c175ef1 100755
--- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
+++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
@@ -934,6 +934,21 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase --edit-todo can be used to
modify todo' '
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
index a58406d..c175ef1 100755
--- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
+++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
@@ -934,6 +934,21 @@ test_expect_success
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Apply the test change without the do not leak part in the fix-up
(queued as a single SQUASH??? commit on 'pu') to what you posted
earlier and see how it breaks.
--- expect 2013-06-18 16:09:21.0 +
+++ actual 2013-06-18 16:09:21.0
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
In other words, the order I was anticipating to see after the
discussion (this is different from saying A series that is not
ordered like this is unacceptable) was:
wt-status: remove unused field in grab_1st_switch_cbdata
This is an unrelated
So after extensive discussions with Junio, I have updated [5/6] to
special-case rebase and rebase -i instead of dropping the HEAD
detached from message altogether. Also, [1/6] includes two more
tests, as suggested by Junio.
Junio: The message is now the constant rebase in progress; onto
$ONTO.
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
So after extensive discussions with Junio, I have updated [5/6] to
special-case rebase and rebase -i instead of dropping the HEAD
detached from message altogether. Also, [1/6] includes two more
tests, as suggested by Junio.
Junio: The message
8 matches
Mail list logo