Martijn Kuipers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-2.95 --std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -W -ofoo foo.c
cc1: unknown C standard `c99'
This makes this test a little less useful. Try with --std=c9x (GCC 2.95
is old enough not to know the standard by the official name).
According to GCC 3.0 C99 status
Jason Riedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're interested, I have a few patches in
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable
that let git compile with xlc on AIX and Sun's non-c99
cc on Solaris.
I've taken a look at them. Thanks.
Changes:
+Replace C99 array
And Junio C Hamano writes:
- +Replace C99 array initializers with code.
- I presume this is to help older compilers?
Yes, so it's relatively unimportant. I could work
around it in my situation; I only included it
because it's necessary for some Sun compilers on
older Solaris
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Jason Riedy wrote:
I'm fine with requiring a limited C99 compiler. A
pedantic compiler will reject members with a length
of zero. 6.7.5.2 para1 requires a value greater than
zero for a constant array size. So the code now (with
[0] decls) is neither C89 nor C99.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
But using array[] means that sizeof() no longer works, and then you
have to use offsetof(), which is a big pain.
This is not true under C99. If an array[] is the last member of a
struct (which is what we are, AFAIK, talking about), then sizeof that
struct is defined and
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
This is not true under C99. If an array[] is the last member of a
struct (which is what we are, AFAIK, talking about), then sizeof that
struct is defined and gives the size of that struct as if the array's
size were zero (but the struct
And Junio C Hamano writes:
- BTW, how would people feel about replacing the
- setenv() and unsetenv() calls with the older putenv()?
- No comment on this one at this moment until I do my own digging
- a bit.
If you're interested, I have a few patches in
Jason Riedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sun's cc doesn't know __attribute__.
It turns out that your patch breaks GCC build (#ifndef
__attribute__ is true there, and it should be---what it does
cannot be done in preprocessor alone). I am going to work it
around like this. Could you try it with
And Junio C Hamano writes:
- It turns out that your patch breaks GCC build
Whoops, sorry. Your fix works with Sun's cc.
BTW, how would people feel about replacing the
setenv() and unsetenv() calls with the older putenv()?
The Solaris version I have to work on doesn't have
the nicer
Jason Riedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And Junio C Hamano writes:
- It turns out that your patch breaks GCC build
Whoops, sorry. Your fix works with Sun's cc.
Thanks.
BTW, how would people feel about replacing the
setenv() and unsetenv() calls with the older putenv()?
The Solaris
10 matches
Mail list logo
