Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch does following:
All instances of exit, exit 1 and (exit 1) in tests have been
replaced with return 1. In fact, (exit 1) had no effect.
Are you sure about all of the above?
You are right about ... || exit in the expect_success tests;
they
Sorry, sent it out without finishing. The worst is return.
With ksh, ash, and dash, the script itself exits with status
code 1 (presumably you are trapping it with trap -- exit,
though).
prompt$ bash k.sh exit
foo
prompt$ bash k.sh false
foo
status 1
prompt$ bash k.sh return
foo
k.sh: line 20:
Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, sent it out without finishing. The worst is return.
Ah, my mistake. You have the eval that can eval return in a
function and let that return return from that function.
Cleverly done.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Cleaned up Debian files.
Conflict with cgvg instead of not installing cg.
Pass prefix=/usr to make install.
---
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+cogito (0.13-1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * New version.
+ * Cleaned up
Hi, Junio!
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 23:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, sent it out without finishing. The worst is return.
Ah, my mistake. You have the eval that can eval return in a
function and let that return return from that function.
Hi, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
People still use GNU Interactive Tools. Not just crazy, stupid people,
and I bet not just Debian people.
Possibly. But the number of people running both git and git are, I'd bet,
smaller than those who will send annoying emails when they install git and
can't
Run gitk on the kernel archive, wait for it to finish reading commit
changesets, scroll to the middle, and watch all the pretty (NOT)
superfluous vertical lines appear and disappear pseudo-randomly.
Looks like something in there (TK or even X11, most likely) cuts off
screen coordinates after 16
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
People still use GNU Interactive Tools. Not just crazy, stupid people,
and I bet not just Debian people.
Why do you say that?
Do you have anybody who actually does, or are you just claiming so?
Some distributions seems to disagree with you.
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
People still use GNU Interactive Tools. Not just crazy, stupid people,
and I bet not just Debian people.
Why do you say that?
Do you have anybody who actually does, or are you just claiming so?
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
People still use GNU Interactive Tools. Not just crazy, stupid people,
and I bet not just Debian people.
Why do you say that?
Do you have anybody who actually does, or are you just claiming so?
Anyway, enough of this. I understand the name will not change and I'm
ok with that. I'll deal with it on our (Debian's) end.
The easy fix is to kill the small git script that is not
mandatory anyway (as far as my quick grep told me).
The cg script has a bit more value.
Sam
-
To
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, enough of this. I understand the name will not change and I'm
ok with that. I'll deal with it on our (Debian's) end.
The easy fix is to kill the small git script that is not
mandatory anyway (as far as my quick grep told me).
The cg
Hi,
Sam Ravnborg:
Anyway, enough of this. I understand the name will not change and I'm
ok with that. I'll deal with it on our (Debian's) end.
The easy fix is to kill the small git script that is not
mandatory anyway (as far as my quick grep told me).
I'd vote to keep the scripts in
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Sam Ravnborg:
Anyway, enough of this. I understand the name will not change and I'm
ok with that. I'll deal with it on our (Debian's) end.
The easy fix is to kill the small git script that is not
mandatory
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another possible solution: Rename git's git to X and install ours as Y.
Ask the user which should be symlinked to /usr/bin/git, if both are
installed, via the existing alternatives system.
I suggested this on debian-devel, and was told that
On Thursday 11 August 2005 15:11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
People still use GNU Interactive Tools. Not just crazy, stupid
people, and I bet not just Debian people.
Why do you say that?
Do you have anybody
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
What I have is bug reports against the cogito package, from people who
want to install both. The reports came very soon after I released the
package, so I dont think it's a totally freak occurance.
The point is, people have the thing
Dear diary, on Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:34:36AM CEST, I got a letter
where Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I accidently commited too many files to my tree today, and now I want to
drop the commit so I have logically separate commits.
What is the right way to do this - in cogito
Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having doing a stupidity with git, but here's what is confusing me
about using bisect:
If I start with a clean directory except for a 2.6 .git/ (where master =
d95a1b4818f2fe38a3cfc9a7d5817dc9a1a69329), then do
$ cd linux-2.6
$ ls
$ cat
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
A small Debian-specific patch to rename the offending scripts (and drop
the Conflicts: entries) is cheap.
Not sure I understand the proper use of dpkg-divert in Debian, but could
_this_ git-core package perhaps ask the user which set of the two
packages he wish to
Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
A small Debian-specific patch to rename the offending scripts (and drop
the Conflicts: entries) is cheap.
Not sure I understand the proper use of dpkg-divert in Debian, but could
_this_ git-core package perhaps ask the user
Dear diary, on Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:42:36AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, if you are lazy, like me, you just pull from Junio once in a while
and do a make test. Turns out there is a missing
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rank nameinstvote old recent
6591 git 114 24 83 7
2 git-core 2 1 0 1 (Not in sid)
29939 cogito-scm 1 0 1 0 (Not in sid)
This obviously
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 16:20 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hands up people. Does anybody _use_ GNU interactive tools? None of this I
have a package crap.
Obviously no one on the git list uses GNU Interactive Tools, or this
problem would have
Hi,
Linus Torvalds:
Hands up people. Does anybody _use_ GNU interactive tools? None of this I
have a package crap.
You're preaching to the converted here.
The Debian-package-for-Debian could pop up a notice asking the user to
symlink /usr/local/bin/git = /usr/bin/gitscm (or whatever) if
Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree
tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45
$ git-read-tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45
fatal: failed to unpack tree object 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree
tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45
$ git-read-tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45
fatal: failed to unpack
Hi, Petr!
Unfortunately, my latest revision of cg-clean has committed suicide
just when I was about to post it. Anyway, I would prefer to wait until
you apply my patch to cg-status to ignore all ignores. That would allow
me to reuse cg-status.
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 01:29 +0200, Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:54:13AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi, Petr!
Hi,
Unfortunately, my latest revision of cg-clean has committed suicide
just when I was about to post it. Anyway, I would prefer to wait until
you apply my
Also add some illustration requested by Linus.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
merge-base.c | 74 +-
1 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
5cbb01b3bb1828759596bff71e16cfcee798491c
diff --git
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It should work anyway,...
That is true. Please forget about the recommendation to slurp
packs and not falling back on commit walker.
Thanks for the patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It should work anyway,...
That is true. Please forget about the recommendation to slurp
packs and not falling back on commit walker.
Thanks for the patch.
No problem; I had been wondering what the
I wrote:
+ * F
+ * / \
+ *E A D
+ * \ / /
+ * B /
+ * \ /
+ *C
+ *
+ * First we push E and F to list to be processed. E gets bit 1
+ * and F gets bit 2. The list becomes:
+ *
33 matches
Mail list logo
