Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And it does not pass my torture test of building rpm's on debian,
but that is not a huge problem.
Ok, why is debian problematic? Is there some missing dependency or
something? I really haven't ever done
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
One last issue with building packages. Some distros are still shipping
GNU interactive tools so git as a package name for the rpm is problematic.
At the very least it is extremely confusing that git-0.99 is a more
recent package that
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ahh. Dang, I should have remembered this. We should call the rpm
git-core-0.99, not just git-0.99.
Chris, I assume this is just changing the name in the spec-file from git
to git-core?
The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
Eric
-
To
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
Yes, I noticed.
I ended up renaming the spec-file too.
Pushed out,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
Yes, I noticed.
I ended up renaming the spec-file too.
Pushed out,
Yup, looks good.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I tagged a v0.99 thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on my FC4 machine that has newer
libraries than my YDL one. The
* Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I tagged a v0.99 thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on my FC4
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by using
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by using
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Are you still up for a patch that records who and when made a tag?
I sent one but it seems to have been lost.
I'd really actually prefer for the code to be shared with the commit code,
so that the user
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Actually I was looking at doing a git-ident thing that will
just compute who git thinks you are. And then git-commit-tree can
just popen it to share code. That looks like how the logic has
been accomplished in other places.
I hate popen() if
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Actually I was looking at doing a git-ident thing that will
just compute who git thinks you are. And then git-commit-tree can
just popen it to share code. That looks like how the logic has
been
12 matches
Mail list logo
