[git-users] Re: Getting the list of files which are changed

2015-04-21 Thread Tanveer Malik
Ahh sorry, if I was not very clear in my question. What actually I am looking for is a way to get the working copies of the files different from its parent branch e.g., I create a branch 'develop' from 'master', then work on files say style.css and on another file called abc.php. Now I want a w

[git-users] Re: There may be a mistake in book Pro Git about rebase

2015-04-21 Thread Deew Lew
Yeah , thanks for your reply ! Sorry for forgot give the URL : ) On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 9:08:46 PM UTC+8, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:04:40 PM UTC+2, Deew Lew wrote: >> >> chapter 3.6 :Git Branching - Rebasing >> > > For the record, the URL i

[git-users] Re: Getting the list of files which are changed

2015-04-21 Thread Evan Flechsig
I think your question might need some clarification. So when you say "download the files", I'm not clear on what you mean. Do you want to have the files placed somewhere outside the working directory? If so, I believe cat-file is going to be needed. When you pass in a SHA of a BLOB which relat

Re: [git-users] g....@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread Evan Flechsig
There is a "plain text" mode in Gmail that might suffice. Click the grey down arrow and select "Plain text mode". I'm not sure if it will meet the requirements, but it might be worth a shot before you start installing and configuring an additional email client. On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 12:

Re: [git-users] g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 19:52 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > From quick googling it turns out that Evolution can't be set to not > attach junk HTML This is clearly not correct, since I've been using Evolution to do exactly that for over a decade. In fact, right in the email composer window fo

Re: [git-users] g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:30:00 -0700 (PDT) a...@mojotech.com wrote: > > ^^^ This one. The Git mailing list accepts only plain text > > messages. Even multipart/alternative messages containing both plain > > text and HTML parts containing the same text (semantically) are not > > accepted. > > > > I

Re: [git-users] g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread ags
Thanks! Could you suggest one? I used to use Pine on Telnet back in the day, but that was pre Gmail. On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 10:16:32 AM UTC-6, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > > ^^^ This one. The Git mailing list accepts only plain text messages. > Even multipart/alternative messages cont

Re: [git-users] g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT) a...@mojotech.com wrote: > I can't send an email to the bug email address. It fails from two > different email addresses, regardless of content, with this message: [...] > The error that the other server returned was: > 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg:

[git-users] Re: g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread ags
This message in particular came from this email body: --- Hello, I have been getting numerous rebase failures. However, when I send any code related, the email is rejected by your server. What's the best way to get an error notification to you guys? --- -- You received this message because you a

[git-users] g...@vger.kernel.org Fails

2015-04-21 Thread ags
I can't send an email to the bug email address. It fails from two different email addresses, regardless of content, with this message: --- Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: g...@vger.kernel.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your messa

Re: [git-users] Re: There may be a mistake in book Pro Git about rebase

2015-04-21 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: [...] > Your understanding is correct, but I don't think your sentence reads > so well. I agree with you that the sentence in the book does not > sound optimal either. Here's what I would write: > > Original: > > > This ba

[git-users] Re: There may be a mistake in book Pro Git about rebase

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:04:40 PM UTC+2, Deew Lew wrote: > > chapter 3.6 :Git Branching - Rebasing > For the record, the URL is http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing > > the book says: > > This basically says, “Check out the client branch, figure out the patches > from

[git-users] There may be a mistake in book Pro Git about rebase

2015-04-21 Thread Deew Lew
chapter 3.6 :Git Branching - Rebasing the book says: This basically says, “Check out the client branch, figure out the patches from the common ancestor of the client and server branches, and then replay them onto master.” I think "then replay them onto master " should be "then replay them ont