Query about status of http-pull

2005-08-24 Thread Martin Schlemmer
the question is if this is known issues (had mail issues, so missed the last week or so's mail) ? Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-13 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 00:19 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:26 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > >> > Dear diary, on W

Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 08:55 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 00:19 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > > On Wed, 2

Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 10:28 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 08:55 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 00:19 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter > > > where Martin

Plug memory leak in update-cache.c

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
Hi, Might not be that an big an issue as it should be freed on exit, but might cause problems with big trees. Plug memory leak in update-cache.c. Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> update-cache.c: 22f3ccd47db4f0888901109a8cbf883d27

Re: Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
:38:25AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > ..snip.. > > Normalize show-diff output, add --update-modes target to update-cache, > > and make sure we only show real changes after changing the tracked > > branch, as

Re: Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:40 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:11 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Please trim the replied mails a bit, snipping old and irrelevant parts. > > This is insane. :-) > > > > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:3

Re: [patch] git: fix memory leak #2 in read-cache.c

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
lution would be to malloc() all these entries and copy them > over from the index file? Slightly slower but safer and free()-able when > update-cache.c notices a collision. The (tested) patch below does this. > > this would also make Martin Schlemmer's update-cache.c

Re: [PATCH] Git pasky include commit-id in Makefile

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
0d40863c44599355af10d9e089312 > write-tree.c: 1534477c91169ebddcf953e3f4d2872495477f6b > > --- > Darren Williams > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[patch pasky] refresh cache after changing tracked tree

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
Hi, I see the latest gitdiff-do does the right thing regarding modes, but we still need to refresh the cache. Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gittrack.sh: 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808 --- 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808/gittrack.sh +++ uncom

[patch pasky] update gitcancel.sh to handle modes as well

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
: Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gittrack.sh: 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808 --- 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808/gittrack.sh +++ uncommitted/gittrack.sh @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ read-tree $(tree-id "$name") gitdiff.sh local "$name" | gitapp

Re: Re: [PATCH] Git pasky include commit-id in Makefile

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:35 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:37:25AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:10 +1000, Darren Williams wrote: > > > Currently the comm

Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:40:09AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > (PS, can you check the fact that your mail client keeps on adding a 'Re: > >

Re: [patch pasky] update gitcancel.sh to handle modes as well

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:57 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > Hi, > > gitcancel.sh do not handle mode changes: > > > $ chmod -x Makefile > $ git cancel > patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input. > > > Rather use checkout-cache to sync

Re: Re: [patch pasky] update gitcancel.sh to handle modes as well

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:07 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:04:50AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Rather use checkout-cache to sync our tree, as should do the right thing > > instead

Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:00 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:01:27AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Dear diary, on Thu,

Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:09 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:00 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:01:27AM CEST, I got a letter > > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > > On Fri, 2

Re: Re: [patch pasky] update gitcancel.sh to handle modes as well

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:15 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:04:50AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Rather use checkout-cache to sync our tree, as should do the right thing > > instead

Re: Re: Re: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch

2005-04-14 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:35 +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: > On 4/14/05, Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + if (update_mode && changed & MODE_CHANGED) > > + chmod(ce->name, ce->st_mode); > > it's &q

[patch pasky 1/2] fix various issues in gitapply.sh (basically did not handle add/del/cm at all)

2005-04-15 Thread Martin Schlemmer
l to increase speed?). Fix typo in line removing temp files. Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gitapply.sh: 47b9346d2679b1bf34220fe4502f15c7d0737b0c --- 47b9346d2679b1bf34220fe4502f15c7d0737b0c/gitapply.sh +++ uncommitted/gitapply.sh @@ -19,15 +19,22 @@ # just handle it al

Re: [patch pasky 1/2] fix various issues in gitapply.sh (basically did not handle add/del/cm at all)

2005-04-15 Thread Martin Schlemmer
PS: forget the '1/2' in the topic, i did it slightly different which required changes to gettrack.sh, etc, but to got getmerge.sh, and saw my short sightedness. On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 11:28 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > Hi, > > The egrep regex should not escape the '{&

Re: fix various issues in gitapply.sh (basically did not handle add/del/cm at all)

2005-04-15 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 20:15 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:28:38AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > > > The egrep regex should not escape the '{' and '}&#x

Re: Plug memory leak in update-cache.c

2005-04-15 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 01:48 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:53:50AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > > > Might not be that an big an issue as it should be freed on exit

[patch] fixup GECOS handling

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
Hi, The gecos is delimited by ',' or ';', so we should only use whatever before the first ',' or ';' for the full name, and not just strip those. Also, a '.' may be valid in the full name (Foo B. Zooman) or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Signed-of

[pasky] recent changes to gitdiff.sh

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
s I am not sure which it is) Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [patch] fork optional branch point normazilation

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
ut I can also > see people using the "lastname, firstname" format, and I'd hate to just > ignore firstname in that case. > If we get the info from /etc/passwd, then we should just use whatever before the first [,;] (see patch I posted earlier). If not, then I think AUTHOR

Re: [pasky] recent changes to gitdiff.sh

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:40 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:40:08PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > Hello, > > > I see the recent changes to gitdiff.sh requires you

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
myself use. As > far as I know, there aren't any patches to make it UTF-8 compliant. > > The alternative is, I suppose, iconv. However, iconv in _my_ glibc > seems buggy (segfaults) and my efforts for building glibc 2.3.2 for > ARM have failed. Effectively that means iconv is inaccessible to > me. > OT, and probably not much help, but glibc-2.3.5 is out ... -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
luded > from the list of "needs update". And I don't know why git is staying > that these files need updating, because they haven't changed since > they were initially checked out. > > This was with some random version of git-pasky-0.04. Unfortunately, > this version d

Re: [patch] fixup GECOS handling

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 22:35 +1000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:36 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > realgecos[strchr(realgecos, ',') - realgecos] = '\0'; > > Er, *strchr(realgecos, ',') = 0; surely? Even if the compiler is c

Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge?

2005-04-19 Thread Martin Schlemmer
:-) > I think pull is pull. If you are doing lots of local stuff and do not want it overwritten, it should have been in a forked branch. > I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it. > -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge?

2005-04-19 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 12:50 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:05:10PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:28 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Dear diary, on Tue,

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Martin Schlemmer
buggy software the workaround was to set the hostname to the FQDN, but that is really just a kludge, and the software should rather be fixed (had to patch postfix some time back for instance). -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but the right way to do this is to set the > > hostname to just that - the hostname, and add 'domain foo.com' > >

Pasky problem with 'git init URL'

2005-04-21 Thread Martin Schlemmer
ext what commands is really needed, what they should be called, and how exactly they should behave before it gets much later in the game. Anyhow, suggestions/comments welcome. Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Pasky problem with 'git init URL'

2005-04-21 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 22:29 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:21:58PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > Just pulled linux-2.6.git, and got t

Re: Pulling linux-2.6.git with gitinit.sh and gitpull.sh fails

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
$ git init rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/torvalds/linux-2.6.git -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Pulling linux-2.6.git with gitinit.sh and gitpull.sh fails

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 14:50 +0100, Rhys Hardwick wrote: > On Friday 22 Apr 2005 14:52, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 14:42 +0100, Rhys Hardwick wrote: > > > Hey there, > > > > > > I am trying to pull the latest repository of the linux-2.

[patch] fixup GECOS handling

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
Hi, This still applies - any reason for not doing this? Thanks, The GECOS is delimited by ',' or ';', so we should only use whatever is before the first ',' or ';' for the full name, rather than just stripping those. Signed-off-by: Martin Schl

[git pasky] tarball question

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
your side, as you could just do a cron to update it one a day/whatever. Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [patch] fixup GECOS handling

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 19:18 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:58:25PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Meaning, if they use a ',' in one of the fields (and it is a linux > >

Re: [git pasky] tarball question

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:31:43PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > I understand why you have the git-pasky-0.6.x.tar.bz2 ta

[pasky] tags issue on mirrors

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
Hi, Just check, you currently have: rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/cogito.git/tags/tags Both with the same tag files. Cheers, -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [3/5] Add http-pull

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
fsck-cache will complain a bit. > > Not if you're using the fact that you don't have them to tell you that you > still need the other 10, which is what tony's scheme would do. > Any way (like maybe extending one of the web interfaces already around) to first get a list of all the sha1's you need, and then starting from the bottom like Tony/Petr wants you to do? -- Martin Schlemmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re:

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:19 -0700, atani wrote: > Martin Schlemmer, I ran "emerge sync" today and found git has been > added to portage, version 0.5. Also note that there are now two "git" > entries within portage app-misc/git and dev-util/git. app-misc/gi