Eric Sunshine sunshine at sunshineco.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at
gmail.com wrote:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch. Something went wrong. This is the correct one
In addition to the tautological
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunshine at sunshineco.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at
gmail.com wrote:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch.
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch. Something went wrong. This is the correct one
From aebfa60feb643280c89b54e5ab87f9d960cde452 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:02:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH]
Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com writes:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch. Something went wrong. This is the correct one
Please, re-read Documentation/SubmittingPatches. In short, don't inline
patch headers and don't forget the sign-off.
Subject:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com writes:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch. Something went wrong. This is the correct one
Please, re-read Documentation/SubmittingPatches. In short, don't inline
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Is it me, or is (origin || !origin) a tautology?
Thanks for the advices Matthieu. I will go through the documentations again.
Is there anything wrong with my logic?
What I wanted to express is
((!remote_is_branch origin) ||
Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com writes:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Is it me, or is (origin || !origin) a tautology?
Thanks for the advices Matthieu. I will go through the documentations again.
Is there anything wrong with my logic?
What I wanted to express
Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com writes:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Is it me, or is (origin || !origin) a tautology?
Thanks for the advices Matthieu. I will go through the documentations again.
Is there anything wrong with my logic?
What I wanted to express
((!remote_is_branch origin) || (!remote_is_branch || !origin))
Is it?
The above is the same as (!remote_is_branch || !origin). What you wrote
before is the same as (!remote_is_branch).
Maybe you should try copypaste from the expressions you are trying to
combine to make sure that
Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com writes:
((!remote_is_branch origin) || (!remote_is_branch || !origin))
Is it?
The above is the same as (!remote_is_branch || !origin). What you wrote
before is the same as (!remote_is_branch).
Maybe you should try copypaste from the expressions
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Nemina Amarasinghe nemi...@gmail.com wrote:
Nemina Amarasinghe neminaa at gmail.com writes:
Sorry for the first patch. Something went wrong. This is the correct one
In addition to the tautological issue pointed out by Matthieu, please
note that this version of
11 matches
Mail list logo