berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#discussion_r1687532640
##
datafusion/expr/src/interval_arithmetic.rs:
##
@@ -332,6 +332,46 @@ impl Interval {
Ok(Self::new(unbounded_endpoint.clone(), unbounded_endpoint))
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#discussion_r1687531392
##
datafusion/expr/src/interval_arithmetic.rs:
##
@@ -332,6 +332,46 @@ impl Interval {
Ok(Self::new(unbounded_endpoint.clone(), unbounded_endpoint))
berkaysynnada commented on PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#issuecomment-2244418683
Thanks @tshauck. This is a nice step towards having comprehensive interval
analysis. I have left a small suggestion. Once that is addressed, the PR will
be good to go 🚀
--
T
Dandandan commented on code in PR #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11592#discussion_r1687564010
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/aggregate/groups_accumulator/prim_op.rs:
##
@@ -102,9 +102,13 @@ where
values,
opt_filter,
joroKr21 commented on code in PR #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11592#discussion_r1687603952
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/aggregate/groups_accumulator/prim_op.rs:
##
@@ -102,9 +102,13 @@ where
values,
opt_filter,
joroKr21 commented on code in PR #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11592#discussion_r1687604948
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/aggregate/groups_accumulator/prim_op.rs:
##
@@ -102,9 +102,13 @@ where
values,
opt_filter,
ozankabak commented on PR #11610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610#issuecomment-2244524858
We plan to submit fetching support to `CoalesceBatchesExec` in a couple
days. It'd be good to do the reorg after that to minimize total effort
--
This is an automated message fro
Blizzara commented on code in PR #11547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11547#discussion_r1687639877
##
datafusion/common/src/hash_utils.rs:
##
@@ -692,6 +730,48 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(hashes[0], hashes[1]);
}
+#[test]
+// Tests actual
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #11613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11613
Updates the requirements on
[substrait](https://github.com/substrait-io/substrait-rs) to permit the latest
version.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/substrait-io/su
jonahgao commented on code in PR #11562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11562#discussion_r1687702567
##
datafusion/sql/src/expr/identifier.rs:
##
@@ -47,40 +47,58 @@ impl<'a, S: ContextProvider> SqlToRel<'a, S> {
// compound identifiers, but this is
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#discussion_r1687794069
##
datafusion/expr/src/expr_fn.rs:
##
@@ -676,6 +679,266 @@ pub fn interval_month_day_nano_lit(value: &str) -> Expr {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::IntervalMo
dharanad opened a new pull request, #11614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11614
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #11438
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes test
alamb commented on PR #11587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11587#issuecomment-2244814903
> This logic (batch in, batch out) should be a separate helper function
(maybe living somewhere else, as it could be useful in other contexts too).
This way, the main logic of the Coal
alamb merged PR #11606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11606
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #11607: Decimal256 type is not supported in datafusion-proto
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11607
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
alamb commented on PR #11606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11606#issuecomment-2244816353
Thanks @leoyvens and @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
alamb commented on PR #11610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610#issuecomment-2244825431
> We plan to submit fetching support to CoalesceBatchesExec in a couple
days. It'd be good to do the reorg after that to minimize total effort
@ozankabak Sounds good to me -- I
alamb commented on code in PR #11610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610#discussion_r1687851341
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/coalesce_batches.rs:
##
@@ -290,26 +277,106 @@ pub fn concat_batches(
arrow::compute::concat_batches(schema, batches)
}
+///
alamb opened a new pull request, #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
While working on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610 I found
that there is a wrapper over `concat
alamb commented on PR #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615#issuecomment-2244905451
@ozankabak mentioned
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610#issuecomment-2244524858 there
was work in progress for `CoalesceBatches` so we might want to make this PR a
draft
alamb commented on code in PR #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615#discussion_r1687859576
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/coalesce_batches.rs:
##
@@ -276,20 +266,6 @@ impl RecordBatchStream for CoalesceBatchesStream {
}
}
-/// Concatenates an arra
ozankabak commented on PR #11610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11610#issuecomment-2244971934
For reference, here is the
[PR](https://github.com/synnada-ai/datafusion-upstream/pull/27) we are
preparing (and will submit to the upstream repo soon):
--
This is an automated
dharanad commented on PR #11614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11614#issuecomment-2244980703
Based on my understanding, since both struct field names and dictionary keys
are of type `Ident`, it seems challenging to distinguish between a `NULL` value
and a `'NULL'` string. F
dharanad commented on code in PR #11614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11614#discussion_r1687937536
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/named_struct.rs:
##
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ fn named_struct_expr(args: &[ColumnarValue]) ->
Result {
.into_iter()
.
Dandandan commented on code in PR #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615#discussion_r1687964534
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ async fn collect_left_input(
let stream = merge.execute(0, context)?;
Dandandan commented on code in PR #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615#discussion_r1687964534
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ async fn collect_left_input(
let stream = merge.execute(0, context)?;
timsaucer commented on code in PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#discussion_r1687978397
##
datafusion/expr/src/expr_fn.rs:
##
@@ -676,6 +679,266 @@ pub fn interval_month_day_nano_lit(value: &str) -> Expr {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::IntervalMon
PengleiShi opened a new pull request, #707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/707
## Which issue does this PR close?
fix rat check error
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How
ozankabak opened a new pull request, #11616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11616
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
FIFO tests did not have enough comments and was hard to read/understand.
Refactored and sim
edmondop commented on issue #11581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11581#issuecomment-2245153268
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
zhuliquan commented on PR #11575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11575#issuecomment-2245159846
> Thanks @zhuliquan -- this makes sense to me.
>
> I don't understand how this issue isn't caught on the CI runner though
I also got confused, `#[cfg(target_os)]` not e
ozankabak commented on PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#issuecomment-2245191841
Apart from @berkaysynnada's outstanding suggestions the only thing I see is
that we would need to use two different π values, depending on whether it is in
the lower bound or the u
timsaucer commented on PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#issuecomment-2245192874
Question: it looks like we have some functions that have both aggregate
functions and window functions defined. Specifically looking at `first_value`
and `last_value`. My thought i
phillipleblanc commented on code in PR #11516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11516#discussion_r1688021260
##
datafusion/catalog/src/session.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license ag
timsaucer commented on code in PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#discussion_r1688043042
##
datafusion/expr/src/expr_fn.rs:
##
@@ -676,6 +679,266 @@ pub fn interval_month_day_nano_lit(value: &str) -> Expr {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::IntervalMon
notfilippo commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2245251759
> Now, i have add_one() function that can take 64-bit integer values and add
+1 to them. The +1 operation is perfectly valid operation for i64 -- it's valid
for sql long/bigi
jayzhan211 opened a new pull request, #11617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11617
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #11543.
Since `create_aggregate_expr` is not stable yet, probably will change after
refactor #11359 .
I only create build
edmondop opened a new issue, #11618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11618
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
When writing a new UDF, a developer needs to decide how to perform error
management in functions that return `Result`, such as `re
xinlifoobar commented on code in PR #11578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11578#discussion_r1688069755
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/plan.rs:
##
@@ -518,6 +510,14 @@ impl LogicalPlan {
Ok(using_columns)
}
+fn as_col(expr: Expr) -> Resul
xinlifoobar commented on PR #11330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11330#issuecomment-2245264178
> > @berkaysynnada 's solution allows option-specific normalization but I
don't think that kind of fine-grained control over option values is needed.
>
> We actually do nee
notfilippo commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2245278317
> if we opt for logicalType, how do users then specify the physical types?
@doki23 -- Through the use of a custom implementation of the `TypeRelation`
trait, which then
xinlifoobar commented on issue #11567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11567#issuecomment-2245279213
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
goldmedal commented on code in PR #11547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11547#discussion_r1688090369
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1785,6 +1798,98 @@ fn from_substrait_literal(
}
}
}
+
xinlifoobar commented on issue #11567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11567#issuecomment-2245316926
Sorry @alamb, I just found out that I could not create AWS account at this
time. Is it fine to use Azure VM, e.g., F16sv2, instead? If not please unassign
me...
![im
vaibhawvipul commented on issue #666:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/666#issuecomment-2245317880
@andygrove I have a doubt here. According to #642 there were relevant tests
added. However I see the following tests pass.
`test("abs Overflow legacy mode")` and `
ozankabak commented on PR #11330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11330#issuecomment-2245314151
Sure -- let's just make sure to avoid API churn and complete the work 🙂
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to G
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#discussion_r1688132417
##
datafusion/expr/src/expr_fn.rs:
##
@@ -676,6 +679,266 @@ pub fn interval_month_day_nano_lit(value: &str) -> Expr {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::IntervalMo
ozankabak merged PR #11616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11616
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
ozankabak commented on PR #11616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11616#issuecomment-2245368658
Since this is a very narrow change that only improves test-readability
without any material change, I'm going to merge it quickly given @mustafasrepo
reviewed it. If anyone sees an
goldmedal commented on code in PR #11602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11602#discussion_r1688149520
##
datafusion/core/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -40,8 +40,10 @@ name = "datafusion"
path = "src/lib.rs"
[features]
-# Used to enable the avro format
nested_expressions
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #11618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11618#issuecomment-2245388504
We should definitely explain them better in the doc.
Here is my understanding. I'm wondering if anyone has additional thoughts or
if I'm understanding something wrong.
jonahgao opened a new pull request, #11619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11619
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
The only difference between `qualified_field_with_unqualified_name` and
`field_with_unqualified_name` is t
goldmedal commented on PR #11035:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11035#issuecomment-2245430181
> BTW I think #11516 is very related to this PR -- maybe once we get that
one in then the API changes needed for this feature will become more natural /
easier to fit
Agreed
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #11620:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11620
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
Fix a tiny typo
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are t
zhuliquan closed issue #11574: always failed test on
datasource::file_format::csv::tests::test_csv_parallel_one_col::case_6 on
windows machine
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11574
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #11621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11621
### Describe the bug
In the following reproducer, two rows in each table should first be joined,
then get evaluted to `true` by the predicate, and finally output to the final
result.
But
notfilippo commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2245458843
> One small nit: I don't think I would lump together FixedSizeBinary with
Binary and FixedSizeList with List. The fixed lengths often have semantics that
should be considered
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #11622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11622
### Describe the bug
The following query has an invalid operation, so it should return a planning
error.
However, it's returning an internal error to indicate a potential bug
```
> s
timsaucer commented on PR #11550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11550#issuecomment-2245490998
From ^ comment I think things like the helper function `first_value()` and
such are adding technical debt. I'm going to dig in tomorrow. If we're updating
the window functions now
andygrove commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/7#issuecomment-2245536377
Thanks for the review @alamb. I plan on merging this later today once the
release is available.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
viirya commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/7#issuecomment-2245540968
Still in draft?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on code in PR #6:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/6#discussion_r1688258419
##
_posts/2024-07-09-datafusion-40.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,450 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Apache Arrow DataFusion 40.0.0 Released"
+date: "2024-07-09 00:00:00"
+autho
alamb commented on code in PR #6:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/6#discussion_r1688260514
##
_posts/2024-07-23-datafusion-40.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Apache DataFusion 40.0.0 Released"
+date: "2024-07-21 00:00:00"
+author: pmc
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #11623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11623
### Describe the bug
Query `select 'foo' ~ null;` should be valid, since `null` can be treated as
a missing string regex, so the final result should be `NULL`
Current datafusion-cli:
``
viirya commented on code in PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/7#discussion_r1688267997
##
_posts/2024-07-20-datafusion-comet-0.1.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Apache DataFusion Comet 0.1.0 Release"
+date: "2024-07-20 00:00:00"
+a
viirya commented on code in PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/7#discussion_r1688269937
##
_posts/2024-07-20-datafusion-comet-0.1.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Apache DataFusion Comet 0.1.0 Release"
+date: "2024-07-20 00:00:00"
+a
Blizzara commented on code in PR #11547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11547#discussion_r1688306249
##
datafusion/common/src/hash_utils.rs:
##
@@ -692,6 +732,64 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(hashes[0], hashes[1]);
}
+#[test]
+// Tests actual
alamb commented on PR #6:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/6#issuecomment-2245617456
Thanks everyone for the comments. I plan to publish this tomorrow
Is there any chance one of the committers could approve this PR so I can do
so? @andygrove maybe?
 the
other day that looks to have some nice support for tz aware calendar handling.
From the benchmarks
tshauck commented on PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#issuecomment-2245810011
Thanks to both of you for the thoughtful feedback.
@berkaysynnada, I updated infinity to use unbounded in
[231a717](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584/commits/231a
wjones127 commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2245817331
> While I agree that having fixed length constraint for a list of logical
types makes sense I am not convinced about FixedSizeBinaries. What would be the
use case? Do you have
ozankabak commented on PR #11584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11584#issuecomment-2245829436
IIRC nextafter is the IEEE standard name for this function, and Rust's
next_up does something similar (in the upward direction). If it is in nightly,
we probably should just create
alamb merged PR #11578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #11578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11578#issuecomment-2245843727
Thanks again @xinlifoobar
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
alamb commented on code in PR #11615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11615#discussion_r1688456284
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ async fn collect_left_input(
let stream = merge.execute(0, context)?;
/
alamb closed issue #11412: Internal Error for an INNER JOIN query (SQLancer)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11412
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
notfilippo commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2245845809
> Example uses of fixed size binary are representing arrays of data types
not supported in Arrow, such as f16 or i128 (UUID). A value with a different
number of bytes would b
alamb merged PR #11575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11575
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #11575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11575#issuecomment-2245846814
Anyhow, thanks again @zhuliquan
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
alamb commented on PR #11575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11575#issuecomment-2245846616
> I'am not sure that ci run unittests on real windows machine according to
workflow yaml.
Or maybe it runs in [WSL](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/faq)
or somethi
alamb closed issue #11574: always failed test on
datasource::file_format::csv::tests::test_csv_parallel_one_col::case_6 on
windows machine
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11574
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
alamb merged PR #11620:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11620
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #11330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11330#issuecomment-2245863417
> Sure -- let's just make sure to avoid API churn and complete the work 🙂
How about we file a ticket explaining what else is needed prior to merging
this PR. I can do this but I
alamb commented on PR #11613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11613#issuecomment-2245866405
Looks like this needs the prost update that is coming in arrow 52.2.0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
alamb commented on PR #11589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11589#issuecomment-2245876211
Thanks again @sgrebnov
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
alamb merged PR #11589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11589
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #11614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11614#discussion_r1688478700
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/named_struct.rs:
##
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ fn named_struct_expr(args: &[ColumnarValue]) ->
Result {
.into_iter()
.unz
alamb commented on code in PR #11614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11614#discussion_r1688480974
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/named_struct.rs:
##
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ fn named_struct_expr(args: &[ColumnarValue]) ->
Result {
.into_iter()
.unz
alamb commented on PR #11558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11558#issuecomment-2245890920
Thanks again @wiedld and @devinjdangelo
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
alamb merged PR #11588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11588
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
