Hi,
Gabor Pali provides his own builder server infrastructure for now when
GHC's HQ is not working. Please have a look at
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/ and contact Gabor for more details
(he is cced).
Thanks!
Karel
On 04/ 1/14 09:42 AM, harry wrote:
It having been suggested that a
We now have a (Linux) travis-ci buildbot so we should be able to use
whatever script that buildbot runs.
To make a full validate you simply check out the source repos and run:
CPUS=N sh validate
(CPUS=N is optional of course.)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:42 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com
Johan Tibell-2 wrote
We now have a (Linux) travis-ci buildbot so we should be able to use
whatever script that buildbot runs.
Does this mean that the Builder page is also no longer relevant? And if so,
how could a Windows buildbot be set up?
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
Johan Tibell-2 wrote
We now have a (Linux) travis-ci buildbot so we should be able to use
whatever script that buildbot runs.
Does this mean that the Builder page is also no longer relevant? And if so,
how could a
Friends
The nightly-build infrastructure for GHC is in disarray, and we could really do
with help. We really want
* Continuous integration so that new test failures show up fast
* Nightly builds on a variety of platforms, giving
snapshots that are easy to install
Originally we used
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2014, 10:25 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
Joachim Breitner has set up Travis-CI. (I don't know exactly what
that is, but it sounds useful.)
Travis is a free cloud service that runs arbitrary tests (in our case, a
stripped version of validate) upon pushes to git
Hi Joachim:
From what I understand Travis CI limits running time for each build. We may be
able to create binaries of stage1 and/or stage2 in one build and test them in
another. We could also fan out the test process using a Build Matrix to let
GHC's full suite fit into the time limit as
Hi,
On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:11, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2014, 11:08 + schrieb Alain O'Dea:
From what I understand Travis CI limits running time for each build.
We may be able to create binaries of stage1 and/or stage2 in one build
Hi,
I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and
which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali was so nice to
start and keep builder server running on
http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/
Just few are there, but others may be added. Just send email to
-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas
| Sent: 01 April 2014 12:46
| To: Joachim Breitner; ghc-d...@haskell.org; Páli Gábor János
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Buildbots
|
|
| Hi,
|
| I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others
April 2014 12:46
| To: Joachim Breitner; ghc-d...@haskell.org; Páli Gábor János
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Buildbots
|
|
| Hi,
|
| I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and
| which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali
2014-04-01 14:03 GMT+02:00 Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com:
Indeed, there is no reason not to use Ian et al's Builder stuff. It's one of
the
options. But it depends on a critical evaluation of what the advantages and
disadvantages of different approaches are
I found Ian's buildbot
hey all, I just exported the igloo builder code from darcs to git, and put
it here https://github.com/cartazio/ghc-builder
would this be something worth adding to github.com/haskell ? (i can easily
add it if other folks it should be surfaced more visibly)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Páli
Thank you Carter.
I think it's reasonable to incubate it on your Github profile for now until we
are certain it is fully working again. Either way works though :)
Best,
Alain
On Apr 1, 2014, at 17:45, Carter Schonwald carter.schonw...@gmail.com wrote:
hey all, I just exported the igloo
2014-04-01 20:15 GMT+02:00 Alain O'Dea alain.o...@gmail.com:
until we are certain it is fully working again.
In what sense? I have been using the latest checkout from the darcs
repository for both the server and the clients, I seldom experienced
any serious problems. Of course, there is place
good to know (i assumed it was in working order from your remarks)
I think making it more surfaced / discoverable might enable a lot more
volunteer build bots (which is an issue aside from maintaining it)
of course, officially moving it to github should be with ian's blessing,
its mostly his
2014-04-01 20:50 GMT+02:00 Carter Schonwald carter.schonw...@gmail.com:
I think making it more surfaced / discoverable might enable a lot more
volunteer build bots (which is an issue aside from maintaining it)
As Karel has indicated, I have been already running an instance of the
server and I
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Joachim Breitner
m...@joachim-breitner.dewrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2014, 10:25 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
Joachim Breitner has set up Travis-CI. (I don't know exactly what
that is, but it sounds useful.)
Travis is a free cloud service that
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
happy with buildbot, it might not be the worst choice.
For reference, the reason we moved away from buildbot is that it needs
to maintain a TCP connection for the duration of the build. With some
builds taking many hours (either
19 matches
Mail list logo
