Thank you.
AFAIK, due to the way Postgrey works, there is no list of “waiting” emails as
if does not distinguish between one email retried 1000 times or 1000 emails
sent once.
So I really think the best you will be able to do is what has been done with
postgreyreport with maybe the option to
Marco,
I apologise if I came across as rude, I just felt a massive debate had grown
from a simple quetion if a tool existed to mentioning some problem that I
didn't know what was.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 03:45:47PM +, Marco van Beek wrote:
Those two do not contradict each other.
No,
Those two do not contradict each other.
PostGrey simply stores an entry with a timestamp. It doesn't record that
anything is waiting, just when the last SMTP connection was made. If
someone sends an email to the same person from the same server every few
days they are never greylisted, and for
How does it contradict everything I have said?
On 2020-03-03 15:16, Henrik Morsing wrote:
> This contradicts everything you have said so far.--
GLLUG mailing list
GLLUG@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:55:07PM +, Marco van Beek wrote:
I'm sorry, I really thing you are over-engineering the problem.
What problem?
...simple a language that I can, this is what happens in postfix:
I have never doubted what happens in postfix/postgrey
* If it finds no
I'm sorry, I really thing you are over-engineering the problem. In as
simple a language that I can, this is what happens in postfix:
* An SMTP connecting is made. Postfix accepts the initial HELO, Mail
>From and Rcpt To.
* Postfix supplies this information to PostGrey
*
Hi
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:31:20PM +, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:28:55PM +, Marco van Beek wrote:
>> When it connects again it just does the maths and if it is more than 300
>> seconds it lets it through.
>
> Since what? If it's stateless, what will
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:28:55PM +, Marco van Beek wrote:
When it connects again it just does the maths and if it is more than 300
seconds it lets it through.
Since what? If it's stateless, what will it compare the 300 seconds to?
It's just impossible, but nevermind, I will figure
Sorry, you are overestimating PostGrey’s ‘inteligence’.PostGrey doesn’t care
about what is waiting. It just tells the connecting server to go away and come
back later. When it connects again it just does the maths and if it is more
than 300 seconds it lets it through.
It then updates the
On 02/03/2020 19:18, Tim Woodall via GLLUG wrote:
On 02/03/2020 07:54, Tim Woodall via GLLUG wrote:
...
Faced with these sorts of issues on anything digital I always first
suspect the PSU
Indeed - and my tweaks involve ensuring that it's getting exactly 5v0. I
think it was getting
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 08:19:54AM +, Marco van Beek wrote:
I think it is the only tool that can tell you if a delayed mail was
subsequently allowed. The database only holds a list of IP addresses and when
they were added. I am pretty sure it doesn’t log any message traffic stats.
I think it is the only tool that can tell you if a delayed mail was
subsequently allowed. The database only holds a list of IP addresses and when
they were added. I am pretty sure it doesn’t log any message traffic stats.
Regards
Marco van Beek
Supporting Role Ltd
> On 3 Mar 2020, at 08:05,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 08:03:35AM +, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
Think it might be called postgreyreport
There is some info about it on this page:
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey
Hi and thanks, but Postgreyreport just looks at past delayed mail in the log
file. It's purely
Think it might be called postgreyreport
There is some info about it on this page:
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey
Regards
Marco van Beek
Supporting Role Ltd
> On 3 Mar 2020, at 07:59, Marco van Beek via GLLUG
> wrote:
>
> There is a reporting tool that goes through your mail logs
There is a reporting tool that goes through your mail logs and finds the
entries that have been delayed by postgrey and haven’t sucesssfully
resubmitted. It isn’t 100% as it doesn’t look in rotated logs, and I can’t
remember what it is called, but there was one a few years ago.
Marco van Beek
15 matches
Mail list logo
