Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented: OK, issues and code were moved successfully. You'll find issues being created by myself, that's totally expected. :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_839789 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented: @mcatanzaro you're welcome! waiting for @bberg to coordinate with me so we can migrate issues and repo directly :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_839050 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_839048 @bberg, mind joining #sysadmin on irc.gnome.org so we can quickly coordinate on that one? Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_839048 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Michael Catanzaro commented: Thanks av! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_839049 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838940 Heh, I was thinking of the issue tracker primarily. git is easy enough to simply push :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838940 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838930 @bberg there you go: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-network-displays -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838930 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838897 @averi ^ oops … typo -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838897 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented: @avery, sorry, I should have updated the title. The repo should be gnome-network-displays (designers suggested a rename). Also, I would want to import everything from https://github.com/benzea/gnome-network-displays. Is that possible or should I create a new (temporary) repository in my own namespace in order to do an import? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838896 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Issue was closed by Andrea Veri Issue #121: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented: @mcatanzaro https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-screencast has been finally created :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_838878 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Michael Catanzaro commented: > Note: in the case of gnome-network-displays (formerly gnome-screencasts), > this module is probably going to be a dependency of gnome-control-center. So > it's likely going into core (or maybe core-deps) regardless. It seems very > unlikely that any conceivable future policy would exclude it from the GNOME/ > namespace. I'd like to request this repo be created this week. I don't understand how it can take more than one year to decide whether a new dependency of gnome-control-center is going to be GNOME/ or not. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_833711 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
***UNCHECKED*** Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented: > Note that the question here is not whether gnome-screencast is a GNOME > project, but whether it can be uploaded to a new repository in the GNOME > namespace. That distinction is one we started to make when moving to gitlab. Right, didn't want to get long here. But there is indeed a difference between before and now for two main reasons: 1. We now have a hierarchical repository namespacing, with clear names on them 1. LDAP mapping to GitLab permissions only allow admins to create new repos in the GNOME namespace. Changing this would mean everyone to have edit access to everything in the GNOME namespace (changing everyone's permissions from developer to maintainer). Unfortunately there isn't a more granular ACL for GitLab. > When was this last discussed? The most recent minutes uploaded are from > February 10th, and don't mention this agenda item. Should we open a board > ticket for that? We have discussed them in working group sessions (a couple of us interested on the topic meet and work on it), which are not minuted. There are a couple of private tickets already in place for this. Not very transparent, we would have to think what can we share and where to make it efficient. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_749302 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
***UNCHECKED*** Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Michael Catanzaro commented: Note: in the case of gnome-network-displays (formerly gnome-screencasts), this module is probably going to be a dependency of gnome-control-center. So it's likely going into core (or maybe core-deps) regardless. It seems very unlikely that any conceivable future policy would exclude it from the GNOME/ namespace. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_749380 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Bastien Nocera commented: > The official body that can decide what is considered a GNOME project is the > board Note that the question here is not whether gnome-screencast is a GNOME project, but whether it can be uploaded to a new repository in the GNOME namespace. That distinction is one we started to make when moving to gitlab. > So that is what the board is trying to solve, however it's more delicate and > has more pieces than it looks like at a first glance. When was this last discussed? The most recent minutes uploaded are from February 10th, and don't mention this agenda item. Should we open a board ticket for that? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_749261 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented: And forgot to mention, I do understand the furstration. I also believe we should have some interim solution, since it's taking signitifacntly longer that I would have expected. I will have some chats around and see if we come up with something. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_749211 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented: @hadess I see, I guess a good oportunity for us to talk with daniels about this and discuss ideas. @mcatanzaro sorry, I didn't see your comment before. Unfortunately, what is obvious to you might not be obvious to someone else, and it's not something for me to take a decision upon. The official body that can decide what is considered a GNOME project is the board, albeit handling individual requests is not efficient and probably not what the board should do in the long-term. So that is what the board is trying to solve, however it's more delicate and has more pieces than it looks like at a first glance. I'm not sure I understand your comment regarding GitHub. Anyone is able to host a project in their personal space at GNOME's GitLab, as you would do in GitHub. It's what Benjamin's project is doing at GitHub, too. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_749210 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Bastien Nocera commented: > @hadess just to understand your issue, is this because fdo has a similar > policy? Or are you saying that for some reason you are not able to create > repositories in your personal space at GNOME gitlab and therefore need to use > fdo personal space? It's because fd.o has a similar policy, yes. There's no global namespace on the fd.o gitlab, but new namespaces aren't allowed. We end up having to put critical pieces of software in our own namespaces, which just makes it that much harder to maintain collectively as we used to every single piece of GNOME software. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_747758 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented: @hadess just to understand your issue, is this because fdo has a similar policy? Or are you saying that for some reason you are not able to create repositories in your personal space at GNOME gitlab and therefore need to use fdo personal space? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_747721 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Bastien Nocera commented: > @hadess, should we close this one or keep open if Carlos (or the Board) will > come up with a process? I'm not the OP, I was simply showing my similar frustrations. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/121#note_747549 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented: @avery, please leave the bug open, the issue has not been resolved. Also, I explicitly asked the board for a decision and clarification how these cases should be handled today. So I hope that there will be news soon. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_745460 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented: @hadess, should we close this one or keep open if Carlos (or the Board) will come up with a process? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_745431 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Bastien Nocera commented: I've ended up using my own namespace on fd.o's gitlab for some stuff that's really pretty core to the desktop experience. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_745219 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Michael Catanzaro commented: Carlos, until we have a process, can we please just put obviously-GNOME stuff under GNOME? New core desktop components developed by Red Hat obviously belong under GNOME/ and not under World/. What's happening currently is they're being developed on GitHub because these repository creation requests are not resolved in a timely manner; we're up to almost a year on this one. I'm just going to ask that until some new policy for software inclusion is developed, we use common sense and put things where they intuitively belong. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_711129 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented: Sorry for the delay. The board is working on a process to make the question of what is considered GNOME software a more straightforward decision. I think there are two options here: 1. Move this now to the World group. 1. Wait until we finalise the process for determining what is GNOME software and related software and move it where it will belong. I don't expect the results of that work to take much longer to finalise, we have been working continuously on it, but I cannot promise we will have it at some specific date. What would you prefer? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_627769 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andre Klapper commented: @csoriano: Ping. Can you please reply? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_627565 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented: @csoriano, what is the situation here? Is this request pending on something else? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_505433 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Benjamin Berg commented: I have no idea what the status is right now (or if maybe I need to ping someone else, e.g. the release team?), but there is a discussion from the designers to rename to e.g. "Network Displays" which would likely also result in a rename of the binary/repository as we can do that easily at this point. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_486023 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
Re: Infrastructure | Create gnome-screencast repository (#121)
Andrea Veri commented: @csoriano, waiting for your acknowledgement before proceeding :) -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/121#note_479827 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. ___ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
