Re: r15207 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - Rename private min/max functions

2006-12-12 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Stimming schrieb: Author: cstim Date: 2006-12-12 06:28:08 -0500 (Tue, 12 Dec 2006) New Revision: 15207 Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15207 Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils/gnc-frequency.c Log: Rename private

Re: Automatically split transactions with sales tax or VAT (Value added tax) when a transaction is booked to an sales or value-added-tax related account

2006-12-12 Thread Nigel Titley
Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Oliver König wrote: Hello, I have posted two feature request for GnuCash at bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364378 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371581 Both feature requests are

Re: Automatically split transactions with sales tax or VAT (Value added tax) when a transaction is booked to an sales or value-added-tax related account

2006-12-12 Thread Geert Janssens
Hi, Maybe it would be nice to include such a script in the contrib directory of the source. I'm sure other users may be interested in such an example. Perhaps even a small wiki page to explain how it works could serve as a mini howto on QIF. Just a suggestion. Regards, Geert On Tuesday 12

Re: Automatically split transactions with sales tax or VAT (Value added tax) when a transaction is booked to an sales or value-added-tax related account

2006-12-12 Thread Nigel Titley
Geert Janssens wrote: Hi, Maybe it would be nice to include such a script in the contrib directory of the source. I'm sure other users may be interested in such an example. Perhaps even a small wiki page to explain how it works could serve as a mini howto on QIF. I could certainly do

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:47:10AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Shoemaker schrieb: I'm just saying SXs could use the real engine objects, just like Invoices. The only difference is that the engine has to learn that real SX

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Chris Shoemaker schrieb: I'm just saying SXs could use the real engine objects, just like Invoices. The only difference is that the engine has to learn that real SX transactions aren't _that_ real. :) Except Invoices don't either, for the same

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread Josh Sled
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 22:06 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Invoices basically reuse the engine objects. But SXs have: struct TTInfo_s [...] which look suspiciously like a Transaction, and struct TTSplitInfo_s [...] which looks suspiciously like a Split. And then the whole duplicated

Re: AUDIT: r15205 - gnucash/trunk - Load and store a commodity's KVP-frame (IFF it's non-empty).

2006-12-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:01:55PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: I'll just point out a couple of things: 1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree should not get backported), there's no

Re: Win32 Port Efforts (eKA$H)

2006-12-12 Thread jarney1
Well, thank you for the source code. Out of curiosity I've spent some more time on the larger batch of changes (step1 in my previous email), as it turned out to be possible to separate the name changes from the rest quite easily. @Everyone: Attached you'll find the patch that changes GUID

Re: AUDIT: r15205 - gnucash/trunk - Load and store a commodity's KVP-frame (IFF it's non-empty).

2006-12-12 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek Atkins schrieb: 1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree should not get backported), there's no chance of a data format change. Does

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:05:21AM -0500, Josh Sled wrote: On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 22:06 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Invoices basically reuse the engine objects. But SXs have: struct TTInfo_s [...] which look suspiciously like a Transaction, and struct TTSplitInfo_s [...] which

Re: AUDIT: r15205 - gnucash/trunk - Load and store a commodity's KVP-frame (IFF it's non-empty).

2006-12-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek Atkins schrieb: 1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree should not get backported),

Re: AUDIT: r15205 - gnucash/trunk - Load and store a commodity's KVP-frame (IFF it's non-empty).

2006-12-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: snip 2.0.[0123] will read a data file with this new object and just ignore it (and drop it on the floor) without erroring out. If that's true, then I withdraw my objection. Just to

Re: Win32 Port Efforts (eKA$H)

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Alexander
--On December 12, 2006 11:19:24 AM +0100 Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * You replaced the type names GUID by GNC_GUID and CURRENCY by GNC_CURRENCY, IGNORE by GNC_IGNORE and others. Any reasons for this, especially the latter two? I vaguely recall GUID being defined in some

Re: Win32 Port Efforts (eKA$H)

2006-12-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Mike Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think I'll apply some of the name changes that concern only the .c files. But especially the s/GUID/GNC_GUID/ change concerns a lot of code, and, as I said, with SVN-trunk we don't observe any problems of the potential name collision here. I'd

fixed bugs in 2.0.3?

2006-12-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Is there an easy way to generate a list of which bugs have been fixed in gnucash 2.0.3? Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org

Re: fixed bugs in 2.0.3?

2006-12-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there an easy way to generate a list of which bugs have been fixed in gnucash 2.0.3? The ChangeLog? Another option is a Bugzilla Query searching on Target = 2.0.3 Thomas -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media

Re: #gnucash public logging?

2006-12-12 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 03:23 schrieb Derek Atkins: On the whole, I think publishing channel logs is a win, or I wouldn't be suggesting it. :) But what do you think? I guess the options are: - do it. - do it for a month or two and re-evaluate. - don't do it. 1) I'm for it.

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread Benoit Grégoire
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 09:54, Derek Atkins wrote: HOWEVER, I think there's another issue here..  When you're doing a large import and you create new accounts as part of the import, if you then cancel the import process these new accounts don't get backed out too. That's probably not

Re: engine objects vs. SX or invoices (was: GDA: A few questions)

2006-12-12 Thread warlord
Quoting Benoit Grégoire [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 09:54, Derek Atkins wrote: HOWEVER, I think there's another issue here.. When you're doing a large import and you create new accounts as part of the import, if you then cancel the import process these new accounts don't

Re: Automatically split transactions with sales tax or VAT (Value added tax) when a transaction is booked to an sales or value-added-tax related account

2006-12-12 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:40:49AM +, Nigel Titley wrote: Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Oliver König wrote: Hello, I have posted two feature request for GnuCash at bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364378

Re: gda-dev does not compile

2006-12-12 Thread Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson wrote: I've modified the config file as follows: ?xml version=1.0? libgda-config section path=/apps/libgda/Datasources/SalesTest entry name=DSN type=string value=URI=/home/phil/.libgda/sales_test.db/ entry name=Description type=string value=Test database for a