On 10/02/2019 19:46, Alex Aycinena wrote:
It is possible that Wm is noting a problem in gnucash that I'm trying to
address with my 'Book Currency' enhancement (unfortunately, a bit delayed).
I'm not antagonistic to your idea, Alex, just not sure I understand it.
For most users who deal in a
On 11/02/2019 17:30, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
Please tell me the intent is to *add* the book currency value, not replace the
actual currency value.
Our USA friends are still thinking about what a TB is for.
I would hope that the actual currency transaction data would still be available.
>
Please tell me the intent is to *add* the book currency value, not replace the
actual currency value.
I would hope that the actual currency transaction data would still be
available. If you have to reconcile against statements or receipts (or suffer
an audit) with foreign amounts sans their
On 11/02/2019 04:03, David Carlson wrote:
Wm, before you run off at the mouth with all your innuendos, look at facts.
I'm hoping you get a message from Liz
If you don't there is something rotten in this list's administration.
Did you try running a test on one of your backups from around
On 09/02/2019 13:03, D via gnucash-devel wrote:
That sounds to me like it's using a different exchange rate from one day to
another, and I'd agree with your assessment in that case. I would have thought
that the exchange rate in the transaction would be used.
You are correct. I have an
On 10/02/2019 22:52, David Carlson wrote:
Wm, Where does unrealized income fall into tb if there is no price in the
database on the closing date for one or more security or currency accounts
because it was not sold?
Essentially it doesn't occur, it is just a number of something if you
aren't
On 10/02/2019 12:40, David Carlson wrote:
Lets all step back a second and consider what the report is supposed to
show before deciding whether it is always correct.
I think the report is conceptually broken.
The report is supposed to cover all of the assets and liabilities that were
selected
On 10/02/2019 16:54, John Ralls wrote:
The "Average Cost" price source creates a price based on the actual transaction prices
and is designed for the TB report, see the thread beginning with
https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2008-July/023297.html. I broke it for
2.6.13-2.6.21,
On 10/02/2019 09:14, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op zondag 10 februari 2019 09:56:51 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone:
I’m in agreement on that note. I understand why someone who doesn’t close
books would like a report that shows a current position. But the Trial
Balance report is really only useful for
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: John Ralls
> To: Adrien Monteleone
> Cc: "gnucash-de...@lists.gnucash.org"
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 08:54:03 -0800
> Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] tb, gnc or me? my trial balance is wrong and I
> th
Lets all step back a second and consider what the report is supposed to
show before deciding whether it is always correct.
The report is supposed to cover all of the assets and liabilities that were
selected when configured only over time interval which was also selected
during the configuration.
Op zondag 10 februari 2019 09:56:51 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone:
> I’m in agreement on that note. I understand why someone who doesn’t close
> books would like a report that shows a current position. But the Trial
> Balance report is really only useful for the close books crowd. It should
> only
I’m in agreement on that note. I understand why someone who doesn’t close books
would like a report that shows a current position. But the Trial Balance report
is really only useful for the close books crowd. It should only reflect actual
transactions in the various registers. In the case of
Ok. I'll preface my comments with the note that every time I try to understand
how the trial balance report works, someone on the list points out how
misguided my understanding is
That being said, I don't understand how a trial balance of completed
transactional history could change value
Following up on my last email, in version 2.6.17 the Trial Balance report
does default to nearest in time as the default valuation procedure. I
don't know what happens in 3.4.
David Carlson
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:05 AM David Carlson
wrote:
> Now if there is an exchange rate entry for 12-19
Now if there is an exchange rate entry for 12-19 and 12-16 but not for
12-18 or 12-17-2017 and the report is using nearest in time, that could
cause what you are seeing.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:04 AM D via gnucash-devel <
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
> That sounds to me like it's using a
That sounds to me like it's using a different exchange rate from one day to
another, and I'd agree with your assessment in that case. I would have thought
that the exchange rate in the transaction would be used.
Mind you, I can't wrap my head around the subtleties that seem to apply on this
On 09/02/2019 07:00, Wm via gnucash-devel wrote:
Background: My gnc TB has been wrong for years. This hasn't been a
problem for me because I can do my own TB in sql and satisfy myself all
is relatively well with my accounts. Over the last week or so I decided
to try again and I think the gnc
On 09/02/2019 07:00, Wm via gnucash-devel wrote:
Background: My gnc TB has been wrong for years. This hasn't been a
problem for me because I can do my own TB in sql and satisfy myself all
is relatively well with my accounts. Over the last week or so I decided
to try again and I think the gnc
Background: My gnc TB has been wrong for years. This hasn't been a
problem for me because I can do my own TB in sql and satisfy myself all
is relatively well with my accounts. Over the last week or so I decided
to try again and I think the gnc TB report is b0rked.
Looking at the bug list,
20 matches
Mail list logo
