> Guix could provide a GUI for editing the system configuration
> at some point but I guess that's not a priority.
Exactly, as an gui for configuring the system in general is no
priority at this point.
Btw, i did not know that "*" was valid in email
uniforms. Fascinating.
&
ste is here:
>>
>> https://bpaste.net/raw/01e184d9b55f
>>
>> build breaks at "no rule to make target
>> '../src/sensordashboard/gnunet-sensordashboard.c' needed by
>> 'gnunet.pot-update"
>
> ___
>
e gnunet project if they'd be
willing to provide svn snapshot releases of certain
branches/projects every n days/weeks"
Is this realistic, and if yes/no may I relay your reply to
bugs.gentoo.org?
This is something I suggested, the first suggestion of gentoo
developer wraeth was
piece?
I'm currently setting up a new server for a group of people which
will serve as the last step for the gnunet gentoo ebuilds, so I
need some days for new software until I can finish that.
thanks for your input,
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
___
GNUnet-deve
his thread. I don't feel like posting a blog
entry on gnunet.org for that, it's not 100% finished yet (openrc service
is not fully functional).
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on h
of this message.
thanks,
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Hi,
Christian Grothoff writes:
> Hi ng0,
>
> You need to also patch configure.ac (at the bottom, just before
> AC_OUTPUT). There, any ".in" file needs to be listed (without the ".in").
>
> Happy hacking!
>
> Christian
Thanks, appended is the new
gnunet-gtk
+Icon=gnunet-gtk
+Terminal=false
+Categories=GTK;Network;P2P;
+StartupNotify=true
+StartupWMClass=gnunet-gtk
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
___
GNUnet-
leting it does no harm to the
released software in the end.
ng0@shadowwalker ~/src/gnurl/tests$ cat data/test1139
source analysis
symbols-in-versions
documentation
#
# Client-side
none
Verify that all libcurl options have man pages
%SRCDIR/manpage-scan.pl %SRCDIR/..
--
n
On gentoo:
test 2052...OK (1025 out of 1025, remaining: 00:00)
TESTDONE: 442 tests out of 443 reported OK: 99%
TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1139
TESTDONE: 1035 tests were considered during 217 seconds.
I will remove the test and see if this gives me 100% success.
ng0 writes
not damage it.
ng0 writes:
> On gentoo:
>
> test 2052...OK (1025 out of 1025, remaining: 00:00)
> TESTDONE: 442 tests out of 443 reported OK: 99%
> TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1139
> TESTDONE: 1035 tests were considered during 217 seconds.
>
> I will remove the
jah writes:
> On 30/09/16 23:03, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> If not, please run
>>
>> $ ldd -r /path/to/gnunet/lib/libgnunettesting.so.1
>>
>> and check the creation time of
>> /path/to/gnunet/lib/libgnunetarm.so.VERSION for whatever version ldd
>> shows you. It should match your recent build ti
Hi,
jah writes:
> On 01/10/16 09:45, ng0 wrote:
>> Which system is this? There's a bug I have open on this and I wanted to
>> take some time today to provide Christian with the core dump of a test
>> failing for my package
> It's Trisquel 7 (Ubuntu 14.0
jah writes:
> On 11/10/16 12:35, ng0 wrote:
>> Jah, are you now working on this bug? My field of expertise here is
>> not C code so I can only read, apply and run the build again. -- ng0
>
> Hi ng0,
>
> I'm no expert either. The patch I submitted in [bug-461
Curl 7.51.0 was released in the last 8 hours, I will release
gnurl as soon as I can. There are no groundbreaking new changes
from the system developers side, but I need to add some
changes. Optimistic case, I finish it tonight, otherwise it will
finish this week.
Just to let you know I started work
ple with slow systems who are still stuck on who knows what
libgcrypt/gnupg versions).
>
> Happy decentralised hacking!
>
> Christian
>
>
> ___
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.or
Christian Grothoff writes:
> On 11/09/2016 10:28 AM, ng0 wrote:
>> I have a question regarding OpenPG signed commits:
>> With Guix, there were some problems for the strict hooks on
>> savannah.gnu.org when we switched to this. Did you sign all the
>> past commits when
read mumble would be an
option).
So for those not present, how shall we do this paper based
copyright re-assignment?
A related question I do have, is the eV bound to some rights to
have (supposedly/real) ID Card names in the members.txt or could
this be changed at any moment? I'd like to change
Sree Harsha Totakura writes:
> On 12/23/2016 12:17 PM, ng0 wrote:
>> I will not be present, as Congress is financially always out of
>> reach for me. We host a "Congress everywhere" at our hack.space,
>> so I'll be present on the 28th (I read mumble would b
make? Can changes be made, or will it
just be left as is?
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ http://ng0.chaosnet.org
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
; (*) For example, Apple appstore forbids GPL, but AFAIK not LGPL. Hence
> GNUnet being GPL is an issue for a pEp/GNUnet-to-iOS port. Also, Taler
> Systems may want to make some code for merchants available under LGPL,
> and libgnunetutil is currently GPL. curl's license has no impa
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> Right now we provide packages for Nix and Guix in tree for
> developer versions. However, this is very limited and not
> extendable without spending much time on thinking about how to
> make it smarter. We can do better.
> One solution I see: It wou
ese error messages mean. Does anyone have
> any ideas? I tried looking at the code for the configure script, but I was
> not enlightened.
>
> Thanks,
> Laverne
>
>
> _______
> GNUnet-develope
laverne writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:54:54 -0600 ng0 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > laverne writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build gnunet-gtk for NixOS (https://nixos.org). gnunet
> 0.10.1 is alre
laverne writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:28:01 -0600 ng0 wrote
> > laverne writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:54:54 -0600 ng0 wrote
>
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > laverne writes:
> &
h: 2
FAIL: test_dht_tools.py
===
TEST: Starting ARM...PASS
TEST: Testing put...PASS
TEST: Testing get...output `[]' differs from expected `['Result 0, type 8:',
'testdata']'
FAIL test_dht_tools.py (exit status: 1)
--
♥Ⓐ ng0 -- http
file but it didn't help very much)? This could help me to
understand the issue.
> On 01/26/2017 12:20 AM, ng0 wrote:
>> I don't think (yet) it's worth opening a bug for this?
>>
>>
on DHT routing or any actual P2P functionality.
> +#
>
> Hope it helps!
Thanks!
I hope so. In any case it will try to fix this as soon as I am
finished with another task.
> On 01/26/2017 12:59 PM, ng0 wrote:
>> Christian Grothoff writes:
>>
>>> Not sure, my b
" and the
email address to "gnunet-developers@gnu.org"? This is more appropriate
and covers the fact that it's done by
people within the GNUnet developer community.
I will assume the answer is "Yes, this is okay" if I receive
no reply until next saturday.
Thanks,
-
On 17-02-20 16:14:41, David Barksdale wrote:
> I'm in favor of anti-squatting measures but I don't like the idea of
> taking money. Maybe a proof of work and proof of stake (in GNUnet). Like
> you have to compute a proof of work and store it in the zone you're
> registering, and it has to be lookup
On 17-02-22 21:39:15, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> This is mostly for Lynx and Martin, but might be of interest to the rest...
>
> I want to briefly explain what I've done with 9bc1c69e2..cd9531932 ...
>
>
> The above change *removes* support for reverse lookups and shortening
> from the GNU Name
FYI:
cURL 7.53.0 has been released on 2017-02-22. One hour after the release,
an issue has been reported which caused the cURL project to work on a
patch release scheduled to be released tomorrow (2017-02-24).
Because repetition is anoying, I will wait with gnURL until the patch
release is out.
_
Hi,
while working on fixing the documentation I found large parts of the
installation document (installation.texi in the repository) cover
versions which are no longer around for systems which since then have
been updated and are supposedly no longer relevant.
I don't think documentation needs a
ng0 transcribed 0.7K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> while working on fixing the documentation I found large parts of the
> installation document (installation.texi in the repository) cover
> versions which are no longer around for systems which since then have
> been updated and are su
carlo von lynX transcribed 9.1K bytes:
> It is up to us to decide whether we want GNUnet to be easily
> abusable like Android, or offer at least Affero style protection
> to its users. I raised the worry and Christian first asked RMS
> for an opinion before we'd bring it here. After some debate,
erfectly fine, at least that's how it was presented to me.
But I'm not a lawyer.
--
PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
rojects working on distributed networks.
For the curious ones, it sits completely at github:
https://github.com/solid/
Shared knowledge would prevent reinventing the wheel a thousand times
over and over again.
Sigh,
ng0
--
PGP and more: https://people.prag
usted to be formally correct (I tried to pay
attention for the first 80% and aimed for just erasing
errors in the end).
HTML generation has a couple of errors left.
I'm pretty sure we want "info" aswell. Any other format
which is desired?
ng0, now understanding why everones documen
Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.4K bytes:
> On 05/29/2017 10:04 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > over the last couple of weeks I started working on the
> > drupal -> texinfo export of our documentation.
> > Adriano Peluso joined me in this effort after a whi
, I have only tested
it with
git web integrations like gitlab and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys so far.
Thanks in advance
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
https://krosos.org/~/ng0/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
GNUnet
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:22:45 +0200, Christian Grothoff
wrote:
> Done. -Christian
>
> On 06/15/2017 12:40 AM, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could someone be so kind and change my pub associated ssh pubkey
> > on taler.net and gnunet.org to
Thanks! gnunet.org was
nything between 5 weeks to 5 months) but it depends on GNUnet development
sharing time with other jobs.
Some people including myself would rather call it 0.11 at this point to
indicate the breaking changes compared to 0.10.1.
With some patience Christian could tell you where help is nee
where
they don't know if git or svn is being used for development.
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
infotropique OS: https://www.infotropique.org
personal: https://ng-0.github.io https://krosos.org/
___
GNUnet-developers ma
Christian Grothoff transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> On 06/25/2017 01:18 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > It seems like our cgit on gnunet.org/git/ no longer displays
> > .c and .h files, in plain view they work. This is with both
> > icecat and latest chromium.
>
> Odd, I didn't to
L29Ah told me that there are svn references left on the homepage.
I corrected some, but I can't edit the page 'https://gnunet.org/downloads'.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org htt
into different testsuite
failures.
2 people confirmed that this is fixed and we should close it:
https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=5006
This just leave 1 open bug then which is assigned to what we
should rename to 0.11 because of the many breaking changes
compared to 0.10.1.
--
ng0
ng0 transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> We can close this as notabug: https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4146
> as there is nothing we can do it about it.
>
> We should close https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4907 unless this
> isn't fixed. I have seen the code from the p
d9577a395 and
5561372beba518194235386b9bb28b37eac6f8c9
the builds can not succeed, with 5561372beba518194235386b9bb28b37eac6f8c9 it
started to be functional again, I've build it successfully from
that commit.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs
ng0 transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> I have just integrated the documentation export from Drupal
> which was in 'gnunet-texinfo' repository into 'gnunet' in the
> "doc" directory.
>
> I have adjusted it to the point where it succeeds to build,
> what'
g to that
repository. I think in this case it was reasonable to just go
ahead.
Everyone involved in contributing code to the main repository
of GNUnet, please help with bringing the documentation
up to date now (https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=5120).
Thanks!
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129
ady have a bugtracker, could anyone with administrative privileges
on our Mantis set up category "gnURL" for bug reports?
Thanks!
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
signature.
subset and might be easier to convince than the cURL developers."
So, what features would you like to see without introducing too
much maintenance burden you have to debug? Is there anything
cURL doesn't do you'd like to see or change?
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7
Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.7K bytes:
> On 08/24/2017 10:31 AM, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the release of 7.55.1-3 I am positive that I achieved one of the
> > initial goals of gnURL: cURL and gnURL should be able to exist on one
> > system
some talk you could give or a
> workshop you can do with others, please let us know.
+1 to what Martin Schanzenbach wrote. I'd like the first edition
of this meet-up to focus on:
- release mgmt (CI, QA, etc)
- roadmaps
- documentation
- website
- "PR"
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD1298
t everyone reads git logs).
At its core all the changes I made are with the build system
of cURL and how it behaves, renamed files, renamed documents,
renamed occurences, references of files, and some more
renames and fixes still pending.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG
Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.8K bytes:
> On 09/13/2017 08:32 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > No matter if we end up with wget2 or stick with gnURL,
> > the code on gnURL is out there. However since I picked
> > up its maintenance I touched many many files, but only
> > added on
s such a list of changes not done by the original author)). A
> > ChangeLog derived from a Git log should be sufficient because it allows
> > to see who did changes at all.
>
> Yep, but gnurl isn't GPL, it's license doesn't have that clause. Also,
> I serious
r narinfo been added to
libextractor since then?
If not, what's needed to get it in?
Thanks,
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/
https://www.infotropique.org https://www.krosos.org
signature.asc
D
Christian Grothoff transcribed 29K bytes:
> On 09/14/2017 02:41 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi Christian and LRN.
> >
> > I'm going through `gnunet-guile` at the moment
> > to understand and improve it.
> > I just found this comment in it (with context):
> &
ng0 transcribed 3.2K bytes:
> Christian Grothoff transcribed 29K bytes:
> > On 09/14/2017 02:41 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > > Hi Christian and LRN.
> > >
> > > I'm going through `gnunet-guile` at the moment
> > > to understand and improve it.
&
'contrib/packages/guix/guix-env.scm' and
'contrib/packages/guix/gnunet-doc.scm'.
You can just commit if you have commit rights, git allows us to just roll back
what didn't work out so well for other systems.
Happy hacking
(and send patches)
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD
e: raise CommandError(self.command, retcode)
remote: CommandError: Command "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t -f gnu...@gnunet.org"
failed with retcode 75
remote:
To gnunet.org:bibliography.git
* [new branch] master -> master
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
Gnu
Christian Grothoff transcribed 2.6K bytes:
> I doubt it would be useful. The message would have been blocked
> elsewhere next anyway, so I doubt failing to send such large e-mails is
> seen as a bug by upstream.
>
> On 09/29/2017 07:16 PM, ng0 wrote:
> > Do I have to repor
izeof. */
/* #undef SIZEOF_LONG_LONG */
/* The size of `off_t', as computed by sizeof. */
#define SIZEOF_OFF_T 8
/* The size of `short', as computed by sizeof. */
#define SIZEOF_SHORT 2
/* The size of `size_t', as computed by sizeof. */
#define SIZEOF_SIZE_T
umentation (Drupal to Tex to Texinfo conversion and cleanup,
etc) (WIP by ng0)
* Improving the documentation (this involved Drupal to Tex to Texinfo
conversion and applying fixes and changes to it) (by ng0)
* Rust bindings for GNUnet (WIP by lurchi, t3sserakt)
* Refactoring the GNUnet schedul
docker-compose.
> If people are interested how to do that I can make a quick write-up.
>
> BR
>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
>
gt; On 27. Oct 2017, at 09:03, Julius Bünger wrote:
> >
> > I assumed it was already the case. Just that the recen release was a
> > while ago.
> >
> > There is v10.gnunet.org/hostlist for the last release and
> > gnunet.org/hostlist for git.
> > (At lea
d this year on their mailinglist
and releases were adjusted in some form.
Maybe we should look into how other projects similar to ours
deal with this issue and develop our own strategy based on
the results of this.
> BR
> Martin
>
>
> > @ng0: good idea ;)
> >
> > LynX i
Who's up for being responsible to get the meeting
(and maybe an additional gathering?) into/at 34c3?
https://events.ccc.de/2017/11/04/people-34c3/
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Static:Assemblies#Orbits
They just unlocked the wiki, and the assemblies.
--
ng0
ng0 transcribed 2.0K bytes:
> Who's up for being responsible to get the meeting
> (and maybe an additional gathering?) into/at 34c3?
>
> https://events.ccc.de/2017/11/04/people-34c3/
> https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Static:Assemblies#Orbits
>
> T
013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament>
>
> <http://publicsphereproject.org/curated/all-patterns.html>Liberating Voices!
> A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution
> <http://publicsphereproject.org/curated/all-patterns.html>
> ___
Hi Peter,
It was the SVN commit that became the git commit
c0e3537bc400698137b43a78fc63ca96ae6315a9
Date: Tue Dec 24 20:09:48 2013 +
releasing GNUnet 0.10.0
peter transcribed 0.2K bytes:
> Hello, what is the git commit from which the 0.10.1 release
> was made?
>
> __
peter transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> Thanks ng0,
>
> Though, isn't that the commit from which 0.10.0 release was made?
Oh, 0.10.1. Yes, this is indeed 0.10.0
> I did a search for '0.10.1' in git log and found these two
>
> commit f7aad960452a4a5abd1765c7268c306b8
ng0 transcribed 3.0K bytes:
> peter transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> > Thanks ng0,
> >
> > Though, isn't that the commit from which 0.10.0 release was made?
>
> Oh, 0.10.1. Yes, this is indeed 0.10.0
>
> > I did a search for '0.10.1&#x
David Barksdale transcribed 2.4K bytes:
>
>
> On November 29, 2017 9:33:02 AM CST, ng0 wrote:
> >ng0 transcribed 3.0K bytes:
> >> peter transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> >> > Thanks ng0,
> >> >
> >> > Though, isn't that the commit from w
to {a-z}, so
1.2.3a resembles what 1.2.3-1 used to be.
This is useful in case you have scripts that can check for
new releases, similar to 'guix refresh'.
with solidariy greetings,
ng0
--
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
WWW:
ng0 transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> To increase the chance that package maintainers notice the change:
> A couple of changes with regards to libgnurl/gnURL:
>
> _download location change__
> In the bigger project of moving away from Drupal, I've published
> (most) of gnurl'
ccepts unsigned commits
due to some complications of importing a set of mixed signed/unsigned
commits. Please sign your commits to this repository.
Happy hacking!
- Forwarded message from ng0 -
> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 20:30:25 +
> From: ng0
> To: redacted
> Cc: redacted
> S
ng0 transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> for those unaware of the context of this forwarded
> message: We are currently working on making a release
> of GNUnet, version 0.11.
Even more context, quoting:
* help get the new "ng0" Web site ready
> It certainly isn
Christian Grothoff transcribed 7.9K bytes:
> Let me try to take the 34c3 spirit into the new year: If you want to see
> GNUnet 0.11.0 released in the first week of January...
>
...
> * make sure 'make check' passes on your systems
...
on commit 61f532f18450e0d7c72f0c17f4a20b5854cf53bf 6 out of 6
Hi,
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 10K bytes:
> You must not commit that as is. As it was meant to start a discussion.
Thanks! I think it's good. I will only edit the patch to keep the comment
(they have their purpose) and add a follow-up patch
(Links must be displayed in printed versions of the
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 10K bytes:
> You must not commit that as is. As it was meant to start a discussion.
>
If you want to send a patch that can be applied to git,
remove this from the patch:
-@c FIXME: is it clear to the average reader what a man-in-the-middle
-@c attack is?
and I can
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 3.1K bytes:
> On 2018-01-06 09:00, ng0 wrote:
> > Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 10K bytes:
> > > You must not commit that as is. As it was meant to start a discussion.
> > >
> >
> > If you want to send a patch that can be a
Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.3K bytes:
> On 01/06/2018 08:03 PM, ng0 wrote:
> >> A problem, I have no solution for right now, is testing the bindings.
> >> Unittesting doesn't make sens, since the bindings requires gnunet-arm
> >> and the services to be r
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> On 2018-01-06 20:03, ng0 wrote:
> > Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 3.1K bytes:
> > >
> > > The new code is less confusion with less macrology and less code in
> > > general,
> > > it's my code afterall
Hi,
at the annual eV meeting you've talked about the licensing.
To add an imbalance to the 3/3 count:
I have the tendency towards "yes", but I'd like to hear
the results of the talks with a lawyer.
--
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
ntext.
> 2018-01-10T06:59:40+ ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > at the annual eV meeting you've talked about the licensing.
> >
> > To add an imbalance to the 3/3 count:
> > I have the tendency towards "yes", but I'd like to hear
> >
ng0 transcribed 3.0K bytes:
> Adonay Felipe Nogueira transcribed 1.5K bytes:
> > I don't know about you all and I'm not an "official" member of the
> > project but if the subject is to license functional data under
> > AGPL-3.0-or-later: I agree.
>
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 1.5K bytes:
> Héllo all,
>
> I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made
> much easier thanks to the work of ng0 on gnunet documentation and
> guile-bytestructures to handle C structs and unions.
>
> You need guix from to
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 6.3K bytes:
> On 2018-01-13 01:49, ng0 wrote:
> > Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 1.5K bytes:
> > > Héllo all,
> > >
> > > I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made
> > > much easier thanks t
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.0K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> Amirouche Boubekki skribis:
>
> > I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made
> > much easier thanks to the work of ng0 on gnunet documentation and
> > guile-bytestructures to handle C struct
ore reader-, user-
and developerfriendly to read? how can we stop alienating and
bore people on the first page already?
> Of course, at some point we need to dive into the various matters that
> gnunet tackles like why an anonymous censorship resistent network is a
> good thing? Maybe that
demia - is one of the things we didn't manage very
well.
--
ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
technically correct gnURL.
Some last switches remain, I am working to reduce this to only
optional switches.
Please report any issues at our bugtracker or the bugs
mailinglist (https://gnunet.org/contact_information).
ng0, maintainer of gnURL/libgnurl
--
ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is
;m playing with.
I'll read into the old messages and tell you more what we thought
about it.
>
>
> ___
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
--
ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
disappeared in
cffaa8b4a6591c02325a368dcc7cd3b999d1ef60, and that src/sensors
doesn't exist anymore.
Could someone give me a short explanation so that I can fix the
Manual in conclusion?
Thanks
--
ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/
___
list
> GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Adding to this subthread: I added nar and narinfo support to
libextractor last year, maybe this comes in handy as well.
--
ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea
rt explanation so that I can fix the
>> Manual in conclusion?
>
> ___
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
--
ng0 :: https://e
delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
> remote: WARNING: repo-specific-hooks:
> '/home/git/.gitolite/local/hooks/repo-specific/git2psyc' doesn't
> exist or is not executable
> To gnunet.org:gitolite-admin.git
>186294a..f6d3945 master -> master
This time it
this I would
write an official application for it.
Thanks,
NG
--
ng0 :: https://crash.cx
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://crash.cx/keys/
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
