On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.ukwrote:
Sorry, part of my reply was about VCs below, not chemists! My reply about
chemists should have been this:
It is not chemists that oppose self-archiving,
it's their publishers! (I've long predicted that as publishers
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which are
visible at time of publication?
None, of course!
Just ask for an e-print when you are in thé ORBi web site and we'll send it at
once. It's Green,
If ever one needed an argument in favour of 'gold' OA, here it is.
Jan
On 13 Jul 2012, at 09:48, brent...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which are
visible at time
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM, brent...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
Thanks for answering
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which
are visible at time of publication?
None, of course!
And that's
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Peter Murray-Rust
Sent: 13 July 2012 08:57
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Chemistry and the Green Door
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Kiley, Robert
r.ki...@wellcome.ac.ukmailto:r.ki...@wellcome.ac.uk wrote
July 2012 08:57
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Chemistry and the Green Door
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Kiley, Robert r.ki...@wellcome.ac.uk wrote:
Peter
Just done a quick search on PMC. There are 1059 full text articles in this
repository
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Kiley, Robert r.ki...@wellcome.ac.ukwrote:
Peter
** **
These 1059 articles were deposited via the ACS “open choice” option.
Thanks - This is (I believe) hybrid Gold - author pays for MS to be Open
in some definition of the term (but not yet CC-BY)
In order to remove ambiguity from the discussion, I think we should make clear
that:
1) it is about Open Access, not about deposit in repositories per se (though
such deposit can well be one of the routes to open access as already
established in Budapest over a decade ago)
2) any repositories
I agree with Jan in the part of his intervention that I kept below. I
should have said that researchers, in looking for literature, should
find themselves naturally and quickly led to repositories (and OA
journals). That is where the real OA advantage would begin to show up.
We are far from this.
