Hi Santosh,
I for one is comfortable with what Marshall posts, as he is not running for
elections nor an opportunistic like Sonal shah, who does a spin now to get
into the Obama team.
hAVE a nICE dAY
Seb
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Samir Kelekar samir_kele...@yahoo.com wrote:
Very good points
Samir,
You said it! and rightly so! I now need not reply to Sandeep. I would have said
more or less, the same thing.
This also is part of my response to Santosh Helekar's defence of the
indefensible. Sonal was indeed a member and part of VHPA and indirectly VHP.
More importantly, She herself
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Mendonza
Bosco D'Mello:As a first-generation American at a very early age, it is
possible that one is not aware of the extent of the activities of the VHP
'back home'.
Response: Are you suggesting that she became a member and office bearer of
an
Sandeep,
In view of Marshalls explanation with quotes, Will U now please apologise to
Marshall and to goanetters for talking nonsense. I think U have exposed
yourself as to where your sensibilities and affiliations lie.
Cheers!
Nascy caldeira
Melbourne,Down Under.
--- On Sat, 13/12/08,
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Samir Kelekar samir_kele...@yahoo.com wrote:
Even if we went just by Sonal Shah's words, it is clear that she did
fund-raising for VHP in 2000 during the Gujarat earthquake. The only fact
of Marshall's that I am believing here is that she was still associated
with
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Nasci Caldeira nascy...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Marshall has no Professional or Business interests. What he is projecting is
certainly in the larger interest of his Community and the Interest of India
as a whole. By exposing the Rats he is doing a solemn service to Goa and
] Sonal Shah renounces VHP affiliation
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
Cc: samir_kele...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, December 14, 2008, 12:59 PM
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Samir Kelekar
samir_kele...@yahoo.com wrote:
Even if we went just by Sonal Shah's words, it is
clear that she did fund-raising for VHP
--- On Sat, 13/12/08, Mario Goveia mgov...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
If she is guilty of supporting violence in Gujarat because
she did not speak up earlier in a public forum, then
everyone who did not speak up in public when Al Qaeda was
attacking US interests throughout the 90s, did not speak up
I think the Sonal Shah episode raises a few questions about the nature
of the Indian elites, particularly their opportunism. They are
conservatives/reactionaries back home, but very progressive when it
comes to sitting under the umbrella of diversity and sharing the fruit
of some other culture.
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Samir Kelekar samir_kele...@yahoo.com wrote:
Very good points re: Sonal shah, Marshall.
She has come clean now denouncing the pogrom by VHP. But it
could be just an opportunistic statement because of compulsions.
Should we take her by the words that she is speaking
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Frederick FN Noronha f...@goa-india.org wrote:
I think the Sonal Shah episode raises a few questions about
the nature of the Indian elites, particularly their opportunism. They
are conservatives/reactionaries back home, but very progressive
when it comes to sitting under
I think the Sonal Shah episode raises a few questions about the nature
of the Indian elites, particularly their opportunism.
RESPONSE: Opportunism is practiced by elites and others vis-avis everyone.
Haven't we seen a Rajan Parrikar fulminate against 'ghantis' back
home, and then proudly hold
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:00:28 -0500
From: Bosco D'Mello bos...@canada.com
Many people voted for Obama because they disliked Bush!! And Mario
tells us regularly why people dislike Bush.
Mario responds:
Actually, post election polls showed that many people voted for Obama because
they were
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Marshall Mendonza mmendonz...@gmail.com wrote:
Response: First of all, let me assure Sandeep that I have
not joined any bandwagon or campaign nor will I join one any time in
future. I have too strong an independent mind for that.
Perhaps, Sandeep will judge the strong
Mario,
Sonal has felt the Guilt; guilt by association.
That is why she has had to issue the 'Denial and Ronouncing with VHP statement.
Simple as that. So why are U attacking Marshall? Talk on Sonal Shah if U must.
In your lower paragraph, U are comparing apples with bananas
Should we not be
Hi Santosh,
I do not see anything 'un thruthful' in Marshall's postings. He is rightfully
exposing all the evil that is happening and more and his source is from the
Media. He brings to the goanet forum what we goanettters might have missed out.
The only people who are shaken by his truthful
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Marshall Mendonza mmendonz...@gmail.com wrote:
Earlier we were informed that it was 'guilt by association' and that the VHP
of A is different from the VHP. Now that the cat is out of the bag, I
wonder what her apologists and spin doctors will tell us next.
It is not
I endorse Santosh's views entirely on this.
I somehow fail to understand why Marshall has joined the bandwagon of
people, who are all out to tarnish the fair name of Sonal Shah with
propaganda that is false, malicious and misleading,
The link below is a strong objective rebuttal to the smear
18 matches
Mail list logo
