On 4/14/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additional thought; Gparted, what with the dependencies it requires, is
> going to end up taking more space (+8MB) than QtParted. Is there some
> specific reason for moving to Gparted? I'm aware that it's under active
> development, but QtParted
On 4/13/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of desktop shortcuts, why is GIMP there? Doesn't make much sense
> to have that be the only "miscellaneous" shortcut on the desktop.
It's being removed for the next RC, as we also found out that it
doesn't make sense to keep it around.
On Thursday 12 April 2007 21:47, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> Ah, right. We are now moving towards Gparted (which is missing in the
> live cd), and the shortcut in the desktop was forgot to be removed.
> Thanks for the report.
Additional thought; Gparted, what with the dependencies it requires,
On Thursday 12 April 2007 21:47, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On 4/12/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm still waiting for my login account to be verified at
> > bugs.gobolinux.org, so I thought I would pester the list in the meantime.
> > I just got home and launched the RC .iso t
On 4/12/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still waiting for my login account to be verified at
> bugs.gobolinux.org, so I thought I would pester the list in the meantime. I
> just got home and launched the RC .iso through VMPlayer, and immediately
> noticed that the icon for qtparte
I'm still waiting for my login account to be verified at
bugs.gobolinux.org, so I thought I would pester the list in the meantime. I
just got home and launched the RC .iso through VMPlayer, and immediately
noticed that the icon for qtparted wasn't right. Clicking on it, I got an
error messa