On 3/10/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I think we're on the same page now. Just need to find time. It
> is really pretty close. I think a lot of regressions is caused by
> change of /sbin/init. Might be worth porting StartLiveCD to
> BootScripts. Only real problem is Config
On 3/10/06, Rafael Jeffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/10/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think we need to use cross-compiling for PPC. ChrootCompiling
> > off Debian or my current GoboLinux PPC setup should suffice. I think I
> &
On 3/11/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/11/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The executable for scons is 'scons', not 'scons.py' as given in Compile at
> > row ~969. I'm not sure that a patch wold help such small change, so I've
> > just typed a ps
On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile the xf86-input-keyboard input driver for the Xorg
> package here.
> I cannot use UnionSandbox, though. It appears that the install is trying to
> copy and remove some files from $TEMPDIR, and UnionSandbo
On 3/17/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > UnionSandbox: Cleaning up.
> > UnionSandbox: Moving entries
> > to: /System/ARM/Programs/Xorg/7.0/.SandboxInstall_Root
> > SandboxInstall: Postprocessing Sandbox
> > SandboxInst
On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any idea on how to fix this? Maybe adding
>
On 3/13/06, Laércio Benedito de Sousa Júnior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some experience in Gentoo (about 2 years), and recently I'm trying
> GoboLinux. Similarly, I've been studying Portage, and now I'm discovering
> Compile. I feel these both packaging systems share some ideas and
> compa
On 3/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to create a recipe for gnome-vfs, but I'm stuck on the install
> script trying to install Gconf modules/settings in gconf settings
> directory. As it's gconftool that's used, I'm not sure what the operation
> is, if it's just about c
On 3/20/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:59:59 +0100, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Just as a sidenote, I used this functionallity t
On 3/20/06, Andy Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if GConf has some special considerations, but it seems
> like the best way to solve this problem is to symlink the files from
> their own Program dir into GConf's Program dir (or wherever they try
> to go). Then when you delete the
Hello,
I started writing this but I ran out of time the last few days, but I
thought it's better to get this out now. At least it contains the
basic set of instructions to the the LiveCD build environment up and
running:
http://gobolinux.org/index.php?page=livecd
If you have the resources, pleas
On 4/1/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've changed Directories.conf to have
> runtimeSettingsNVPicture="$goboPrograms/&NAME/&VERSION/Resources/Defaults/Settings"
>
> instead of
> runtimeSettingsNVPicture="$goboPrograms/&NAME/Settings"
>
> and now UpdateSettings works. It finds fil
On 4/2/06, A`Tuin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I haven't tried that, but doesn't it work if you use wildcards?
> > docs=(subdir1/docs/* subdir2/docs/* subdir3/docs/*)
Watch out for the use of wildcards. They are expanded when the recipe
is sourced, so the results may not be what you want -- cu
On 4/2/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess that any recipe that copies files in "sysconfdir" would have
> the same problem. Here is the program I was talking about. It is pretty
> small.
>
> http://plicq.ouvaton.org/download/gobolinux/recipe-store/TPB--0.6.4--recipe.tar.bz2
Oh,
On 4/4/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're facing a very high rate of spam on the gobolinux-recipes mailing list.
> Is there anyone familiar with Mailman's way of writing regexs? I'd like to
> know whether it's possible to use procmail's syntax or not.
I don't think so.
On 4/9/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/8/06, Peter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A couple of months ago, there was talk of setting a firmer release
> > date
> > for 013, but it seems as though nothing came of it. What needs to still be
> > done? I have
On 4/9/06, Jeremiah Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that the Programs and other directories in Gobo are
> hardcoded (haven't looked at post-012 stuff) and I was thinking it might
> be nice to make this an environment or other variable that could be
> changed by more advanced u
On 4/9/06, Fabio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> it will be very nice a call to
> Exec "Loading sound configuration..." alsactl restore
> in BootUp script and a call to
> Exec "Saving sound configuration"alsactl store
> in Shutdown script by default.
Actually, I'm loo
Hi all,
I'm going down to Porto Alegre next week, I'll meet André and Lucas
there. We'll try to write a decent to-do list and put it on
gobolinux.org, with a link to the bugtracker, etc.
I just tried the latest CVS state of the LiveCD on an actual machine,
and I got a kernel oops that seems to be
On 4/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/16/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/15/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Might be interesting to try passing that parameter to mksquashfs (and
> > > see how much the file size will
On 4/17/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest that we have a working setup with HAL and stuff on 013.
>
> See my notes on this: http://kymatica.com/stuff/InstallNotes.html#HAL
Thanks! I'll definitely give it a look
-- Hisham
typing qwerty at a cybercafe is not much fun
Hi,
It's been a while since there were any news on how the development of
the next release is going, so I thought I might give some status
update (now that I'm back from my trip, with regular internet access
again).
In a nutshell: all efforts have been directed to make the ISO build
environment
On 5/10/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perl target for Compile doesn't seem to be working yet (tried with CVS
snapshot):
I just commited an implementation of your instructions for compiling
Zim in the is_perl mode. Please give it another try.
-- Hisham
___
On 5/12/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just spent a few minutes with ChrootCompile. There seems to be a
problem with ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox. Specifically,
UnionSandbox does not like running in a chroot. It is unable to mount
dirs because it's view is different than the ker
On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quick fix is forcing the use of FiboSandbox.
>
> Yes, since the chroot is a sandbox by itself, it&
On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Isn't it falling back to Fibo by default? I thought SandboxInstall did
> that. Unless the Fibo
On 5/16/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hisham Muhammad a écrit :
> On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I say different rev numbers does not make sense. The build
>> environment should be "fully deterministic". What's
On 5/15/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/15/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Package r3p1 might be built against GCC 3.3 and r3p2 built against GCC
> 4.0, both having been
On 5/17/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/17/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/17/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Talking about dependencies, I'm dealing with situations here where
> > they differ depending on the architecture being co
On 5/17/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/5/17, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 5/17/06, Peter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Now, I'm no great fan of Java, but I recognize that it's probably
> > > something good to have easily and readily available. So will 0
On 5/18/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/18/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lucas C. Villa Real a écrit :
> > I think the best thing to do is to define "standard"
> > configure_options, and let the user override that later in the command
> > line (with Compi
On 5/19/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/5/19, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 5/18/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5/17/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is this doable with any
On 5/19/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hisham Muhammad a écrit :
> On 5/18/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5/18/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Maybe it could be possible to have a way to add c
On 5/19/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/19/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/19/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2006/5/19, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > How about Resource/Licen
Hi,
I've started a new script that recipe maintainers will use to
interface with the recipe store in CVS. I committed an initial
revision to CVS (latest Scripts and Compile required) so you all could
take a look and I could get some feedback.
For safe testing, I'm using a local CVS repository. Y
Committed. Sorry about the delay. :)
-- Hisham
On 5/27/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This could also be useful in cases like Wine, where they decided to
> change the versioning from a revision date to a version number.
> FindPackage reports that the latest version is 20050310, whereas
>
On 6/1/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on getting an XFCE release done, both as recipes and as
packages, but I cannot create a package from one of the programs included,
EXO. I get this error everytime:
...
Here you see that each error is printed twice (which is correc
Hello,
Here's another release of Scripts and Compile, with the usual bunch of
bugfixes. They have been pretty stable in CVS recently, so I figured
it's about time to roll out those fixes, before making tweaks to CVS
that may break it again. :)
http://gobo.calica.com/packages/official/Scripts--2.
On 6/5/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been having issues with Rootless lately that I've never had
before. This, I've determined, is because I haven't used Rootless
since the advent of package signing code in the Scripts.
A lot of the functions in Scripts/Functions/File that have to do w
On 6/6/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, after making my change, my Rootless environment only gave
me my new 'bypassing sudo' message from within SignProgram. Signing-
related functions within Functions/File seem to have quite a few
sudo_exec calls. Maybe those should be taken out and
On 6/11/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/10/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> Module name:tools
> Changes by: André Detsch06/06/11 00:17:02
>
> Modified files:
> BuildLiveCD/bin: BuildRoot
>
> Log messag
On 6/16/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
Module name:tools
Changes by: Lucas Correia Villa Real 06/06/16 20:47:36
Modified files:
ChrootCompile : MiniInstallPackage
Log message:
hiding conflicts during
On 6/16/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
Module name:tools
Changes by: Lucas Correia Villa Real 06/06/16 20:52:00
Modified files:
ChrootCompile : ChrootCompile
Log message:
Moved Automake, Autoconf and
On 6/19/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The work on providing updated packages for GoboLinux 013 continues.
>
> The goal is to have updated packages for all programs listed at
> http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/013_packages_list
On 6/20/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A question here:
Should the official wget recipe/package be compiled with support to ssl?
This adds OpenSSL as dependency. OpenSSL uses to break compatibility
from one version to another. E.g. 0.9.7 is not compatible with 0.9.6
(at least when c
This started as a quick off-list email exchange but evolved to the
point we think it should be discussed on-list:
-- Forwarded (and translated :-D ) message follows --
On 6/27/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah--I think I see. So by "main keyserver network," you mean something
> like
> pgp.mit.edu or keyserver.veridis.com, right? Ok, that makes sense.
I was thinking of pgp.net, but most of them seem to sync with
On 7/4/06, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 10:09, André Detsch wrote:
> Grub 0.95
Has anyone integrated my GRUB+splashscreen recipe? It's for GRUB 0.97,
and
I assumed that it was working fine, since no one complained about bugs.
André mentioned me some problems w
On 7/4/06, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 15:13, Hisham Muhammad wrote:
> I see a mention of "GRUB xpm" in the list, but I'll make that clearer
> in the wiki.
I think that the recipe I submitted doesn't have support for XPM im
Hello,
I noticed a problem in the wiki layout, which I _think_ was introduced
after the Opera fixes. If you go to a short page, such as
http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page the footer appears below
the main content div, not below the sideboxes. I tried to fix it but
had no success. Could so
On 7/10/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log message:
Set 'quick' as default on UpdateSettings.
I'd probably wait for Dan to give his ok before making this change,
but if you feel confident about it I guess it's fine.
Important: what's the current defaults in Upd
On 7/10/06, Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking around, and found in these files:
BootScripts/Resources/Tasks/Check{,Root}FS
> if [ -e /forcefsck ]
> then force="-f"
> else force=""
> fi
>
> fsck $fsckOptions -p -C -T {-A,/} # <--depends on which file
Given that 'force' doesn't appea
On 7/10/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log message:
Avoid failing when running make without arguments.
But version_check was put on top on purpose, to force VERSION to be passed!
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolin
On 7/10/06, Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hisham Muhammad wrote:
> On 7/10/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Log message:
>> Avoid failing when running make without arguments.
>
> But version_check was put on top on purpose, to force VERS
On 7/11/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removed broken test for 'update_each_settings', as it was not being
referenced as a variable and there wasn't any references for it in the
entire cvs.
It was not referenced anywhere else because it was supposed to be a
publ
On 7/11/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Removed broken test for 'update_each_settings', as it was not
being
&
On 7/14/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removed "^" before "$app" in the blacklist construction, as it was being
included as a printable character (I guess it was not the intention,
right?).
That _was_ the intention. It's a special character to match
beginning-of
On 7/15/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I just came across the following article at OSNews regarding the state
of the NTFS-3G driver:
http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=15196
It seems to be working pretty fine, but I saw some posts regarding
patent problems. Is t
Thinking about it, should Nasm be in the base? It's not a very
essential part of the build environment but once in a blue moon some
app needs it to build (ZSNES being an example). With ChrootCompile
supporting BuildDependencies (just noticed plain Compile doesn't yet!)
I think the need to have it
Hello,
I coded some changes to Compile and friends, but I'd like some
feedback before committing.
When trying to build some recipes I submitted in a different machine,
I noticed it had some errors, but still Compile kept going on, making
those errors harder to spot, leaving garbage around in /Pr
On 7/19/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes to Scripts: Dependencies was trying to be smart and run the
> given program a second time without the additional argument, so that
> it would try "Compile Foo 1.2" and then "Compile Foo" if the former
> fails. Problem is, if the
On 7/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[CheckDependencies exists and works]
Great. :)
So, if we are going to change dependencies code, it's probably time to
integrate CheckDependencies to the scripts. It already represents a
central point of decision making about dependencies. Btw,
On 7/24/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The questions become a little strange with this modification:
CheckDependencies: Compile Glibc 2.4 recipe or skip this dependency?
[Y]es/[N]o/[NA]No to All/[YA]Yes to All
You mean the grammar? I didn't see a problem, but maybe
"Compile
On 7/26/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/26/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the Groff recipe needs the lines
> configure_options=(
> "--with-appresdir=/Programs/Groff/1.19.2/lib/X11/app-defaults"
> )
> adding to it, else it tries to put GXditview somewhere
On 7/24/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there all,
>
> I was wondering if the cvs idea extends to arch, bazaar, and or darcs
> repositories. (I saw that svn is already covered).
>
> And if so, I assume something like packagename-
> should be used, so people do not install them if they ar
Hello,
I just realized there was no easy way to pack a single recipe, so now
GenRecipeStore accepts a name and also optionally a version as
parameters, allowing to create a Foo--1.0--recipe.tar.bz2 file under
/F/C/Store running
GenRecipeStore foo
While I was at it, I had GenRecipeStore automati
On 7/16/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why are the directories in /S/V linked to the programs instead of the
programs linked to /S/V like in all other links? Is there a good reason?
The reason I ask is because programs fail at installation when trying to
install anything int $varia
On 7/28/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/28/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'Compile' Util-Linux 2.12r just failed here with the following lines:
>
> cc -c -pipe -O2 -mtune=i486 -fomit-frame-pointer -I../lib -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -I/usr/incl
On 7/28/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fortunately, we're low-load enough now that one person can
periodically check all recent edits and IP ban spammers. And, since
Hisham and I have started doing it, the rate at which we've been
spammed seems to have gone down somewhat, which I think is a g
On 7/30/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log message:
If there is no Resources/Dependencies file, create one using
'GenBuildInformation',
not 'Dependencies'
--- CreatePackage 26 Jun 2006 23:21:01 - 1.14
+++ CreatePackage 30 Jul 2006 18:59:52 -
On 7/31/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Log message:
> > If there is no Resources/Dependencies file, create one using
> &g
On 7/31/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I upgraded Compile recently to 1.5.1 and now some of my recipes
are failing because target is being passed in the environment
to make. This is a problem, because GNUstep-Make uses it to
decide whether we are cross-compiling or not. I'm unsetting
it
On 8/1/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the best behaviour for Dependencies at meta-recipes?
>
> After thinking a little bit about it, I think the following items
> should be respected / assumed:
> - The meta-recipe m
On 7/31/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Experimenting a bit with Unmanaged together with trying out the idea of
making the kernel aware of third party modules.
First Unmanaged:
Why does the file Resources/UnmanagedFiles exist? Is there an idea that
the files should be removed when t
On 8/1/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I like the flag approach. Something very clear like,
>
> part_of_meta_only=yes
>
> I can add that now (my lab is back). RecipeLint can even check and
&g
On 8/1/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/8/1, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/1/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/31/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What is the best
On 8/2/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/7/31, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/31/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I upgraded Compile recently to
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type=
> instead of is_=yes.
I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there?
I assume the same, of course.
This is a big change wrt compatibility, but one I've been thinking
about f
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's a really good question. Unless someone has an objection, I
>> also vote for
>>
>> recipe_type=autoconf
>
> I don't have a definite vote for this, but I'd be leaning betwe
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:22:10 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On 8/5/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Making use of unmanaged files I noticed that, in recipes, one has to
specify the unmanaged files in a variable, unmanaged_files, in the recipe
instead of a file, Resources/UnmanagedFiles, in the recipe directory. I
think the latter is more natu
On 8/6/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:21:55 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/5/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Making use of unmanaged files I noticed that, in recipes, one has to
>>
On 8/7/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* moved exit(0) out of cleanup (one might want to do things after
wrapup)
* moved call of post_install to after wrapup - files are installed in
wrapup
I liked the invariant that wrapup was always guaranteed to be the last
thi
On 8/10/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:37:53 +0200, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jonas Karlsson wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:56:54 +0200, Jonatan Liljedahl
>>> Isn't this exactly what unionfs can solve?
>>>
>> Yes, unionsandbox solves this, but
On 8/10/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:15:14 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> keeping our software repositories. The discussion has been up before,
>> which software to use for this. Afaic there's only one al
On 8/10/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:25:25 +0200, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm having a problem with FindPackage. It just stays forever at
> > "Downloading updated remo
Hi,
Another release of Scripts and Compile, integrating many bugfixes and
a bunch of cool stuff. Highlights:
* fixes problem with endless loop in FindPackage
* uses new and more powerful script CheckDependencies, which supports
version ranges
* new syntax for recipe type declarations (recipe_typ
On 8/12/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/12/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've made both NewVersion and Compile use "${packagename}_svn" as checkout
> directory.
That's fine, thanks.
Minor nit: "${packagename}-svn" is nicer. I don't think we use
undersc
On 7/27/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While dependencies for Recipes depend only at the source code itself,
dependency for a binary package are, most of the time, dependent on
the environment the package was compiled.
E.g., a recipe can be compatible with Glibc [2,), but, once a pa
On 8/16/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have thought of implementing getopt for parsing options in OptionParser,
so one could stack options better. Anyone got any objections?
Using bash's builtin getopts? I admit I never looked closely at it (or
I did so long ago I can't remembe
On 8/17/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:33:31 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/16/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have thought of implementing getopt for parsing options in
>> Op
On 8/20/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If that fails, there's "sandbox_options=("--no-sandbox")', which will
blindly let that pass.
...and have it break with upgrades, create 'unpackable' /Programs
entries, etc etc. (It never hurts to reiterate those warnings) We need
to fi
On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
Module name:tools
Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 06/08/23 18:46:12
Modified files:
GoboHide/Resources/Tasks: GoboHide
BuildLiveCD/bin: BuildRoot
Log message:
Adding some dire
On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:46:12 +0200, Jonas Karlsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT: /sources/goboscripts
> Module name: tools
> Changes by:Jonas Karlsson 06/08/23 18:46:12
>
> Modified files:
>GoboHide/Resources/Tas
On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:15:17 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Yes, of course. The Task can just 'source' gobohide.conf and append
>> > the extra entries to the
On 8/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:14:00 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:07:36 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 8/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:07:36 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/goboscripts
> Module name: tools
> Changes by: Hisham Muhammad 06/08/02 19:07:36
>
> Modif
On 8/24/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is how I see us using SVN for handling recipes: two trees in the
> server; a live development tree and another one with released
> revisions, from which the t
On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:56:36 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> CVSROOT: /sources/goboscripts
>> Module name: tools
>> C
On 8/27/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:58:08 +0200, Laurent Pelecq
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:24 -0300, "Hisham Muhammad"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit :
>> Another release of Scripts and Com
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
