Consider aufs instead of unionfs.
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
Forgive my ignorance if this simply makes no sense, but I was
wondering if GoboHide could be a Kernel module instead of a patch?
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-dev
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
wrote:
> No, it can't. The GoboHide kernel extension requires hooks in
> different parts of the VFS which makes it impractical do ship it as a
> module.
In that case what do you think about submitting a generalized patch to
Linux Kernel develo
I am thinking about creating a new distro. A fork of GoboLinux, which
I am thinking of calling GotoLinux.
Are there others that would be interested in such a project?
To facilitate this, what is needed to get the distro up to speed and
what are the challenges in maintaining it?
__
he Gobo
project carry on. And I was very hopeful for it myself for a long
time. But I think now, Gobo makes more sense as a stepping stone to a
broader project.
-- trans
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
me in this regard would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Trans
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
Why did Gobo go with its own init system instead of using systemd? Would
the same decision be made now?
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Michael Homer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Trans wrote:
> > Why did Gobo go with its own init system instead of using systemd? Would
> the
> > same decision be made now?
> Lack of plutonium for the DeLorean. I think systemd wou
Thought you all might be interested in hearing about my progress in
creating a spiritual derivative of GoboLinux. In turn I use any feedback
you have to offer.
Originally I had planed to use GoboLinux's file hierarchy with only some
minor modifications, but I have given it a great deal of contempl
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ben Francis wrote:
> It seems you're running into the basic problem of an hierarchical
> filesystem: information isn't relate-able as it is in a relational
> database Notice how the structure of each directory repeats itself. To a
> database guy, that screams "N
My work on GotoLinux continues, slow but steady. I have narrowed down the
file hierarchy to one of two designs.
https://github.com/gotolinux/gotolinux.github.com/wiki/New-File-Hierarchy---Alternates
Appreciate your thoughts.
trans
___
gobolinux
I have definitely decided to the later layout for the GotoLinux project.
I've started to work in here:
https://github.com/gotolinux/gotolinux.github.com/wiki/New-file-hierarchy
However I think the FHS++ ideas are still an improvement on current FHS.
Yesterday I partially converted my Debian box
Has anyone considered replacing it with a simpler wiki like Gollum? No
database is required, it's file based and uses a git repo to record changes.
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/lis
Thought there might be some interest in this:
http://minimal.linux-bg.org/
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sergio Tortosa Benedito
wrote:
> Hi there Devense! I guess you are now a Dev (a Gobo one I think), right?
> .
> Anyway, if you are interested, I've been working on updating Gobo's scripts
> (written originally in Bash, I've been using a pretty-much-Ruby compiled
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
