Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

On 4/29/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I know this has come up before, multiple times, and it never goes > anywhere. And here we go again! :) Just kidding. I'm fully convinced we need USE flags or something equivalent (and have been for a while by now). > I have a more speci

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

On 5/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I don't know how well Xorg works with its parts separated in > > /Programs -- there might be path issues to fix. Maybe an intermediate > > approach could be used; if my memory ser

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

Wow, that was a huge email to reply, lot's of stuff going on, but I gave my best. Here it goes: On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:40:48 +0200, Michael Homer > > On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:42:14 +0200,

Re: [gobolinux-devel] What is the preferred location for Lua's modules?

On 5/5/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on recipes for Lua and several of Lua's modules. > > There are two types of Lua modules: > * modules written in Lua > * modules written in C > > My question is, should modules be installed in the Lua-default locatons: > > $target/share

Re: [gobolinux-devel] What is the preferred location for Lua's modules?

On 5/6/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/6/07, Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Another question about modules, i add a module_name.lua to all my > > recipes like this: > > > > +local > > > SOPATH="@%Compile_target%@/lib/lua/@%Compile_luaversion%@/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

Ok, I think we are converging: On 5/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 06 May 2007 00:39:54 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:40:48 +0200, Michael Homer > >> > On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EM

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/BootScripts/Themes AppleII

On 5/29/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/29/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2007 21:52:12 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 5/29/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> CVSROOT:/sources

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/BootScripts/Themes AppleII

On 5/30/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2007 03:44:03 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/29/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 5/29/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 29 May 2007 21:52:12 +0200, Lucas C. Villa

Re: [gobolinux-devel] "Defragmenting" the LiveCD

On 6/16/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if the Gobo LiveCD is fully optimized; I remember being > surprised at how slower it was than other LiveCDs I've tried. (I can't check > it now, since I deleted the .iso file once I successfully installed it as a > virtual image.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] "Defragmenting" the LiveCD

On 6/16/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if the Gobo LiveCD is fully optimized; I remember being > surprised at how slower it was than other LiveCDs I've tried. (I can't check > it now, since I deleted the .iso file once I successfully installed it as a > virtual image.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE-flags vs. Flavored Dependencies

On 7/1/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/2/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There was talk back in May of adding USE-flag style functionality to > > Compile: > > > > http://www.wotfun.com/pipermail/gobolinux-devel/2007-April/002570.html > > http://www.wotfun.com/

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Tracking dependencies

On 7/2/07, Anshuman Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, I was convinced this (link based) approach is perfect for > gobo...but the lack of response was worrying me :) ...I will document > the details on the wiki and send out a link...then if everyone is in > agreement we can work out a pl

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Tracking dependencies

On 7/2/07, Anshuman Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hisham, > Did you disagree with the alternate location for the Dependency files > and Links as well as he has described? My first impression was that his suggestions added to what you proposed, combining the best aspects of your and Jan's

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE-flags vs. Flavored Dependencies

On 7/2/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am very wary about how this would be determined (thinking about > > community/social/flamewar implications, rather than technical issues). > > I'd rather avoid this can of worms and s

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Tracking dependencies

On 7/4/07, Anshuman Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great idea, I'm going to put the prototype implementation together > since the prototype might be just as involved as the logic needed in > Compile,RemoveProgram... > > The solution which includes all ideas discussed below, will show bro

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

On 7/15/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > New versions of Happy and Alex require Cabal (The Haskell Cabal: Common > Architecture for Building Applications and Libraries, > ) instead of 'configure'-type build. (and I > need those new versions in order to deve

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Status of 014?

On 7/15/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, some fixes were made to the installer, basically fixing > internationalization support and GRUB's menu.lst generation. Hisham > and Guilherme Bedin have fixed the Udev issues, but I don't know if > they've managed to upload the new

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Status of 014?

On 7/15/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/15/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been pretty quiet on the release front. I was just looking over > the > > past thread (toward the bottom of "Defragmenting the LiveCD", and noticed > > that there seems to be so

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

On 7/16/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/17/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > There have been problems in the past with the configuration of Perl, > > > but I think things are now mostly settled on

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] KDE/QT related compiles failing

On 7/16/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/16/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/16/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Do you mean from "make install" or PostInstall? I would argue that > > > "make install" shouldn't alter passwd/shadow

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug? Compile GCC-Java Depends on bash/zsh/...?

On 7/16/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just tried to Compile GCC-Java from my rc shell and it failed with > an error like "export: not found" (apologies for not recording the > exact error). Rebuilding from bash seems to cure it. > > Is there any way to note a Compile dependency like th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Call for volunteers: would you like to be a recipe committer?

On 7/17/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Hisham Muhammad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been a while now that GoboLinux recipes are being maintained in a > > Subversion server instead of being just a directory in a web server > > where someone (Lucas for the last few years) uploaded t

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

On 7/17/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A very vague thought: maybe what we need is a way to "talk" to other > > package managers, to have a bridge between our management/dependency > > system, and theirs. Perhaps implement

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

On 7/17/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 7/17/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 7/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> A very vague thought: maybe what we need is a way to "talk" to other > >>> package managers, to

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

On 7/17/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/17/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On 7/17/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 7/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> A very vague thought: maybe what w

Re: [gobolinux-devel] minor Scripts issues

On 7/20/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/18/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bad things I noticed while reading through some gobo scripts :) (the > > versions from CVS.) I could make patches for these (probably). (of > > course I might be mistaken about some

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/DevelScripts/bin UpdateLocalStore

On 7/25/07, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +echo `date` Finished >> ~/cronlog.txt > > Was this trace code intentionally left in the code? Yes, it's a simple diagnostics tool for quickly logging into gobolinux.org and seeing if the job is running as it should. Thanks for the code revi

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/Scripts/src List.c Makefile

On 7/26/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/24/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + echo $(shell uname -m) > > + echo $(STATIC) > > Can I remove this, or do you pretend to keep the echoes for some other > reason? Ouch, sure, sorry. Guess that's wha

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/DevelScripts/bin ImportRecipe PublishRevi...

On 7/25/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/25/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts > > Module name:tools > > Changes by: Hisham Muhammad 07/07/25 09:30:19 > > > > Modified files: > > DevelScripts/bin:

Re: [gobolinux-devel] future plans

On 7/30/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/29/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So write a "UseProgram" tool to manage PATH for you. > > > > > * It uses the binary path directly, whereas GoboLinux seems to be > promoting > > > the notion of the Program as a whole, which

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/DevelScripts/bin UpdateLocalStore

On 7/31/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > --- UpdateLocalStore25 Jul 2007 08:28:52 - 1.3 > > +++ UpdateLocalStore25 Jul 2007 09:27:05 - 1.4 > > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > > #!/bin/sh > > +export HOME=/home/gobolinux

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/Compile/bin PackRecipe

On 7/31/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/7/31, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:01:51 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > CVSROOT: /sources/goboscripts > > > Module name: tools > > > Changes by: Lucas C. Villa R

Re: [gobolinux-devel] recipe svn permission errors?

On 8/12/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sometime...yesterday? when trying to use PutRecipe I started getting all > errors like > > svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/recipes/revisions' > svn: PROPFIND of '/recipes/revisions': 403 Forbidden > (http://svn.gobolinux.org) > > from svn. Thi

Re: [gobolinux-devel] wiki spam

Hi, Just to add another minor data point to the discussion, looking at the wiki users list it seems to me that there's a lot of random-looking accounts there that look spambot-generated. http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Special:Listusers -- Hisham On 8/13/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Nic

Re: [gobolinux-devel] default Settings files that need certain permissions

On 8/13/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (as far as I know this is a problem with all our Sudo recipes and I > haven't found a way to fix it in the recipe) > > "sudoers" normally must be mode 0440 as well as user 0:group 0. In the > recipe, Resources/Defaults/Settings/sudoers appears

Re: [gobolinux-devel] default Settings files that need certain permissions

On 8/13/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The copy in Defaults should never be edited, so I think it should stay > > with the stricter permissions. > > Hmm.. when I found it, it referred to user "gobo", so it must have been > modified sometime (?); and then

Re: [gobolinux-devel] recipe svn permission errors?

On 8/13/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:21:34 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/12/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sometime...yesterday? when trying to use PutRecipe I started getting all > >> errors like > >> > >> svn: PROPFIND req

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Handling of old dependencies format

On 8/15/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An old issue that I just encountered, is that depencencies in the old format > "Foo x.y" is interpreted as just "Foo" while it really should be interpreted > as "Foo >= x.y" imo. In my case it was the GnuPG recipe that listed > "LibAssuan 1.0.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Dangerous changes in UpdateRecipeStore

On 8/16/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know what happened (well I do, but I'm still pretty chocked), but I > nearly had a wipeout with PutRecipe! Luckily I was looking with half an eye > when I saw lots of "normal" files, text files, documents, images, logs etc, > scroll by

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Ghostscript again

On 8/17/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Was looking at updating the (Artofcode-)Ghostscript recipe to the latest > release, > 8.60 which also includes the merging of ESP-Ghostscript. I also noted that > it's > not Artofcode that's responsible for the releases anymore, but Artifex >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [Gobolinux-recipes] Multiple commit messages in recipes commit

On 8/21/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to make post-commit to update the recipe store automatically, instead > of running UpdateLocalStore every two hours, I accidently made a recursive > post-commit rule. Sorry about that. I actually think the two-hour delay is a good way

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Readding syntax check for Dependencies to RecipeLint

On 8/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While talking about dependencies and such, I'd like to readd this patch to > RecipeLint. Ok, but here are some suggestions/comments: > --- RecipeLint18 Nov 2006 15:15:00 - 1.30 > +++ RecipeLint20 Nov 2006 20:21:55 -0

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Dependencies rework

On 8/27/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:43:44 +0200, Michael Homer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/25/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Having submitted several binar

Re: [gobolinux-devel] FFTW float or double?

On 8/30/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > > On 8/30/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The FFTW library is a little stupid, since it can be compiled with float > >> (libfftw3f.a) or double (libfftw3f.a) precision, and also as static (

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Development meeting reminder

On 1/17/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 1:20 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a reminder of the developer meeting on IRC this saturday (sunday > > for michael). > > > > Dates and times: > > Saturday 19, 11am - US west coast (GMT-8) > > Sa

Re: [gobolinux-devel] 014.b grub enumeration.

On 3/19/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just tried to install on real hardware. Sorta a pathological case and > grub isn't installed correctly. This is with recent snapshots of > Installer and ConfigTools. > > My hd setup: > /dev/hda > /dev/hdb > /dev/sda (SATA SI 3114 chipset

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Name of GoboLinux 014 bugfix release

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/19/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Right. I'm ok with 014.1. Or maybe 014.01, then 014.10 and then > > 014.11. No more than 3 bug fix releases would be allowed in this case > > ;-) > > > > I l

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3332 - trunk/ChrootCompile/bin

On 5/12/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't get fooled by GuessProgramCase. Only use it if the recipe could not be > found in the first attempt. GuessProgramCase uses the entries you have in /Programs. When those don't match, it means you have an inconsistency somewhere. Isn't

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3332 - trunk/ChrootCompile/bin

On 5/20/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> GuessProgramCase uses the entries you have in /Programs. When those >> don't match, it means you have an inconsistency somewhere. Isn't it >> better to stop in those cases an