Sebastien Binet wrote:
> On Thu Nov 3, 2022 at 14:02 CET, Jan Mercl wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:49 PM Hotei wrote:
> >
> > > I added some generic code to a project and godoc doesn't seem to like
> that and stops working when it sees the generics. It's a 4 yea
I added some generic code to a project and godoc doesn't seem to like that
and stops working when it sees the generics. It's a 4 year old version of
godoc so that's perhaps not a surprise. What is a surprise is that godoc
isn't shipped with go any longer. Is there a version that handles
e, unrelated modules, but
> you could work around it by defining a dummy package & module with imports
> to the modules you wish to include (use replace to point to the local
> version) and running `godoc` from the dummy module
>
> On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 4:01:37 PM
jerome - not sure that the code you provided fully answers the OP's
problem. I think you'd need to craft an http request and get a response to
really KNOW that the server is indeed responding. If you do that as a
replacement for where you have the "select {}" then I think you've got it.
Clarification. As mentioned earlier, $GOPATH is supposed to go away in the
(possibly near) future so one of my main goals is to get it working outside
the $GOPATH tree. At present my solution has been to copy my source tree
(about 4 GB) to a "non-module-aware" go ecosystem on a different
Could use a little help figuring out how to attack the following problem:
I normally run godoc locally with $godoc -http=":6060"& and then browse it
with chrome.
Many years ago that method broke for a while as godoc was "reinvented" but
then it came back pretty much the same as before. A
Jan,
To clarify a bit, "world" used to be everything under $GOPATH/src. Since
gophers can expect at some point to see $GOPATH go away the directory I now
refer to as "world" is just a local/private version of my github.com/hotei
repository with about 250 or so su
own "go.mod"), or just separate packages within the same module
> (go.mod only exists at the top level)? Normally the latter is what you
> want.
>
> On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 17:57:55 UTC Hotei wrote:
>
>> Heeding the prodding of the go gurus on this lis
Heeding the prodding of the go gurus on this list I just converted a bunch
of old code to modules and was wondering what the "module" equivalent to
"go build ./..." is. I used to be able to use that command at the top of
my code tree and it would attempt to build everything in the subdirs.
Gabriel - Thank you for reminding me that perl is a write-only language.
It's been a few years since I had to deal with it. How many files are we
talking about and on what media?
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 12:50:54 PM UTC-5, Gabriel Forster wrote:
>
> What takes 18 seconds in a perl
re "meaningfullness" - I think he's saying that a finalizer for a function
called in a goroutine might not run if main() quits first, intentionally or
otherwise. You can of course check for this specific case by making sure
all your goroutines are cleaned up before exiting main - but in some
I think you'll need something like x := float(355) / float(113) - where
float is either float32 or float64 depending on your preferred trade-off
for accuracy vs bytes required per number.
On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 12:38:12 PM UTC-4, Mark Longtin wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm new to Go
Because zip compression programs can use different levels of compression
there is certainly no expectation that zipping the same file with different
compression levels will give the the same output. It MIGHT - but it's not
to be expected or relied upon. The only thing that's "guaranteed" is
I assume you're aware it's valid to have two initializers for the same
variable.? I often use -v and -verbose to both modify flagVerbose.
var flagVerbose bool
func init() {
boolVar(,"v"
boolVar( "verbose"
}
Other than that I don't see what your package is actually enhancing over
Sam,
I'm guessing but a lot of (non-commercial) folks use an inexpensive
"wireless router" with NAT as their "firewall". Besides, the application
code is trivial. Probably less than a hundred lines. Potentially s a good
teaching moment for using go and how it does http. On the other hand -
Certainly possible. You can put the whitelisted IPS in a map and use that
to filter the incoming requests.
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 10:17:37 AM UTC-4, Naveen Shivegowda wrote:
>
> Is it possible to make http servers listen only on a few source ip's and
> request from any other source
The fact that collisions are possible does not make them "easy to create"
especially when you add the compileable requirement. If you're uneasy
about md5 you could always use more bits - like SHA1 used by "git" or
SHA256 (or larger) if you're really paranoid.
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at
If you create the source as a byte array by converting it ([]byte("abcde")
then the compiler can NOT optimize it away. However - I don't think it
will *use* the capacity information in the source since it's not relevant
and it's going to copy the data bytes and length in any case.
If you're
Looking at the asm it appears that there is a conversion func called in the
second version - right before the copy with memmove.
Based on this I'd say what happens AFTER the conversion is the same in both
version since the destination is the same and the content is the same. The
only
Have you tried examining the assembler output? go build -gcflags="-S"
program.go if I recall correctly.
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:27:36 AM UTC-4, T L wrote:
>
>
> I know a string value can be used as []byte if the first parameter if the
> builtin copy/append function is a []byte
With times under one nanosecond I'm wondering what you're actually
measuring. Aggressive optimization could make this an "empty" loop.
Synthetic benchmarks like this can be tricky to interpret.
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 7:56:32 AM UTC-4, Ondrej wrote:
>
> I wanted to see if there was a
Depending on your needs (you didn't specify the target mobile devices) you
can use go's SMTP facilities to send an email to a phone via an SMS
gateway. This list might help though I'm not sure how current it is.
http://mfitzp.io/list-of-email-to-sms-gateways/
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at
22 matches
Mail list logo
