I am having problems deleting one of my applications. I get errors every
time I disable or delete. It says it's scheduled for deletion but never
deletes. I've tried many times. If I goto the new google developer
dashboard I get the project you requested is unavailable. Can someone
from
app: fonefindr-hr is having the same issue
On Friday, December 7, 2012 2:51:05 AM UTC-6, Lucian Baciu wrote:
My app has just started throwing this:
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$OverQuotaException: The API call
datastore_v3.Put() required more quota than is available
for all data
done
On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:19:20 PM UTC-6, Takashi Matsuo (Google)
wrote:
Hi Dutch,
I've just put a bandaid on flexzorgnet. Thanks for reporting.
Everyone, I opened an issue for this on our issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8525
If you
You could use a session and store the redirect page in a session variable
if they are redirected to a login page. Then send to that page after a
successful login. Or you could embed the redirect page in your urls. This
should be a trivial issue to solve.
On Friday, November 23, 2012 7:01:55
As of yesterday my app, ticker-app, can no longer connect to Twitter's API.
It has worked fine for over a year. As of yesterday any urlfetch call to
twitter.com times out with DeadlineExceeded. However, using other app ID's
I have they can still urlfetch to twitter. I have to assume it has
with an
error response.
On Friday, August 24, 2012 9:26:34 AM UTC-5, JH wrote:
As of yesterday my app, ticker-app, can no longer connect to Twitter's
API. It has worked fine for over a year. As of yesterday any urlfetch
call to twitter.com times out with DeadlineExceeded. However, using
other
Actually datastore queries can use quite a bit of ram
On Dec 14, 3:36 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
People are hung up on this 600mhz 128m Ram thing. If you are using the
API’s you are likely barely touching your CPU, and if you are using MemCache
and Datastore most the time
I've seen it mentioned here before that Google's RAM is made with
solid gold. Not sure if it's true or not...
On Dec 14, 6:50 am, John sc...@peoplepedia.org wrote:
Just started thinking about this... but now that we are basically paying
for all the datastore reads/writes, and bandwidth
I remember this going into TT a LONG time ago... seems like a simple
api, very curious that it hasn't surfaced yet
On Dec 5, 3:02 pm, Felippe Bueno felippe.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone know something about the appengine monitoring api ?
I don't have any URL.
I saw Alan Green
+1. Admin console is extremely unreliable. It seems every time I use
it response times are extremely slow or result in 500's.
On Dec 5, 4:47 pm, Andrius A andriu...@gmail.com wrote:
It is getting annoying when suddenly GAE admin panel starts behaving slowly
and throws errors and its happening
at that
point we will re-evaluate whether we can do an SLA for it.
Greg D'Alesandre
Senior Product Manager, Google App Engine
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, JH ja...@mhztech.com wrote:
+1. Admin console is extremely unreliable. It seems every time I use
it response times are extremely
try using a cache-busting stragegy, like mystyle.css?1234 You could
even insert the current built of your app for 1234 so all caches break
each time you update your app
On Dec 2, 4:32 am, Mike phy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I have made changes to one of my CSS files, however after deploying my
It would interest me if there was another premium level, one perhaps
that doesn't include support or the SLA. SLA's are more or less
worthless in my opinion. But, the product that interests me is the
ability to pay $ XXX and open as many paid as as I want.. and not
incur a $9/month fee for each.
You get 128 megs of ram for front end instances. Also, so far my
experience says that py 2.7 uses quite a bit more ram just to run
hello world.
On Nov 20, 5:58 pm, ThePiachu thepia...@gmail.com wrote:
My application relies on accessing a lot of simple stored data and
displaying it. I'm
I would check out pubnub.com
On Nov 15, 3:18 pm, Andrius A andriu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am having a problem to find a way to send the same message to many users
connected through channels instantaneously. I understand that there is no
way at the moment to have the same channel for many
I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES. I switched when I noticed
a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platform.
I have an extremely high deliverability rate with SES.
On Nov 10, 1:45 pm, voscausa
os.environ['INSTANCE_ID']
On Nov 2, 11:47 am, David Whittaker dpwhitta...@gmail.com wrote:
You could use the uuid module to create an identifier and record that
and a timestamp on the app object when you create the app object to
start with. As I understand it, one app object is created when
The dashboard/deploy system has been practically unusable for me for
the past 12 hours. EXTREMELY slow with errors half the time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
does master student mean you are a graduate student at a university?
On Oct 20, 1:08 pm, master student arwa.cs.2...@gmail.com wrote:
yes I reinstall more than once but still the same problem
On 20 ÃßÊæÈÑ, 19:18, James Jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz wrote:
reinstall?
On Thu, Oct 20,
Have you seen:
http://freegeoip.net/static/index.html
or
http://ipinfodb.com/
On Oct 14, 12:54 pm, Chris Collins xop...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a seasonal app(s). The volume would need to be about 5,000-10,000
requests per day for high season. On off-seasons (e.g. winter months), it
would drop
I don't know about web2py but it's best with python to just store a
datetime object. That way you can manipulate it in any way needed.
On Oct 13, 10:58 am, WallyDD shaneb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rohit,
How the date is stored is largely irrelevant. Store them any way you
can, as long as it
just got 1.5.5 and on deploy I get:
Compilation starting.
Error 503: --- begin server output ---
Try Again (503)
An unexpected failure has occurred. Please try again.
--- end server output ---
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
ask your professor if you can use python
why do schools always love java??
On Oct 11, 2:37 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
You aren't looking at the economics of it. When I started doing Video
Compression, and SEO, both of those fields were elite they didn't hand out
degrees
You don't want to rely on this as with py27 os.environ will be thread
local...
On Oct 4, 2:25 am, Gillwill gillwill2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Another alternative that worked for me, that did not require the
import django, is by putting the following line:
os.environ['DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE'] =
consider using jinja2
http://jinja.pocoo.org/docs/
On Oct 4, 3:15 pm, Murph paul.j.mu...@googlemail.com wrote:
You should probably use some other template system (e.g. django.template),
as webapp.template is going to be deprecated soon.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Tim,
Can you elaborate on what you mean by smart caching ? You start
serving pages before your full stack has started?
On Sep 29, 7:23 pm, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a site, with max idle set to 1, and Min Pending Latency set to 500ms,
and I find performance is great.
It
yes, under new pricing a min idle instance of 3 will be very
expensive.
On Sep 27, 2:28 pm, Tapir tapir@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 28, 3:22 am, Tapir tapir@gmail.com wrote:
For a java app, to avoid slow warm-up problem, 3 instances are needed
to run always.
The $9/month always on
is a minimum spend not a fee (this was changed
from the original model) so it would just be $105.60.
Greg
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:11 PM, JH ja...@mhztech.com wrote:
yes, under new pricing a min idle instance of 3 will be very
expensive.
On Sep 27, 2:28 pm, Tapir tapir@gmail.com
For a while now I have been UNABLE to DELETE a google app engine app
from my google apps domain. I had multiple old M/S apps that google
apps will never seem to let me delete...
On Sep 20, 6:25 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
This started as a Response to Vlad, and then I decided
Or they could bill you once you reach a certain amount like $20. Just
as ad words doesn't pay until you are owed $100
On Sep 18, 12:13 am, Gerald Tan woefulwab...@gmail.com wrote:
You're forgetting the $2.10 per week (~$9/month) minimum charge, which is
actually annoying for small apps
The mail api may not send the email immediately, I'd imagine it hits a
queue first. So it can't throw an error on bad email addresses. The
only solution is to return bounced emails via the return-path. GAE
has never supported sending the user bounced emails. If you need this
functionality you
, 8:01 am, JH ja...@mhztech.com wrote:
Or they could bill you once you reach a certain amount like $20. Just
as ad words doesn't pay until you are owed $100
On Sep 18, 12:13 am, Gerald Tan woefulwab...@gmail.com wrote:
You're forgetting the $2.10 per week (~$9/month) minimum charge
Generally email api's will not be able to tell you if you are sending
to a bad email address. Just because mail.send returns to you it does
not mean the email has actually been sent. It may sit in a queue for
an arbitrary amount of time before going out. The issue however, is
that gae email has
When first seeing the new pricing I was very upset. From watching
this group I wasn't the only one. However, at the risk of angering
some I'd like to report my findings.
When first seeing the new pricing my first idea was to change
providers. Not only to save some money, but also in fear of
as far as I know you cannot query across namespaces. this is not the
intended use for namespaces.
On Sep 14, 7:51 am, objectuser kevin.k.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess not. :)
I'm hoping that if I want to move to it in the future, I'm not hosed. I
think it might be an expensive move but a
well there are metadata queries to get all namespaces, then you could
query each of them... not the best solution but the namespace api is
really cool for it's intended use.
On Sep 14, 2:30 pm, andreas schmid a.schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
i agree.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:35 PM, objectuser wrote:
Yes I found counts absolutely kill your small datastore ops. Of
course it has never been recommended to .count()... but if you are you
will not be able to stay in free quota...
On Sep 13, 12:51 pm, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.com wrote:
Doing a
sounds like you could use async urlfetch instead of 20 separate tasks?
On Sep 13, 6:43 pm, ESPR!T w...@espr.it wrote:
Hello guys,
I would like to get an advice how to deal with long running request
when the new pricing will apply.
My app is searching for the cheapest book prices on the
I like to make people enter their email address twice, like a
password. It's amazing how many people misspell their own email.
On Sep 12, 9:27 am, de Witte wd.dewi...@gmail.com wrote:
Tapir,
We use the same system. After a week we delete all records without
activation enabled. Nothing to do
I have a question about the new scheduler. Before HRD the scheduler
use to tear down instances very aggressively. Now it doesn't appear
to. I have some hobby apps that may get no traffic at all for hours,
however, the scheduler keeps 1 instance alive. It seems to me after
15 minutes of no
google overlords that these freebie instances are more prevalent in the HRD
cluster because it is underutilized. As more apps move from M/S to HRD,
they expect that the freebies will drop off.
On Sep 11, 2011, at 10:05 AM, JH wrote:
I have a question about the new scheduler. Before HRD
+1 for max active instances
On Sep 10, 12:51 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to be able to limit *active* instances too. Particularly
for my 'testing' applications. I don't want to have 20 or 30
instances spun up while I'm testing stuff. Would prefer to limit
Google's mail api is rather limited and in my experience subject to
being flagged as spam. You may want to try out Amazon's SES. I have
used it with great success. They have methods to inform you if an
email you sent is returned as undeliverable. They also have a high
rate of deliverability.
This error was happening a year ago when I used to send gae email. I
get far less urlfetch timeouts when sending via Amazon... If you are
going to email with gae you need to do it via tasks so they will
retry. You will continue to see this mail.send timeout.
On Sep 10, 2:46 pm, Joshua Smith
Of course $5/month is not possible as $9 is the minimum...
On Sep 9, 2:14 pm, TJ Yang tjyang2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I disabled my test GAE instance for now to be sure I am not going to be
billed.
By doing so, an idea came across.
Why not allow us to create an GAE instance bind to
import os
os.environ['CURRENT_VERSION_ID']
On Sep 6, 5:54 am, Felix E. Klee felix.k...@inka.de wrote:
I reposted this question now on:
google-appengine-pyt...@googlegroups.com
Seems to be more appropriate.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Googlers,
Any word on whether or not leaving preview will mean we can actually
get billed once a month? I must admit accounting departments are
driven crazy by the amateurish weekly billing of small amounts.
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
This issue has already been brought up with no reply. The HRD has
started to see spikes and increasing latency like we used to see with
M/S. I think we all would feel a little better if this was addressed
in some fashion. We all remember how bad the latency was with M/S...
Almost unusable.
On
in general, not M/S in the specific. But all other indications is
that M/S is generally performing as it has been.
Greg
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:23 PM, JH ja...@mhztech.com wrote:
This issue has already been brought up with no reply. The HRD has
started to see spikes
Gregory,
I just want to let you guys know that I love app engine and my app
does not need major scalability, and never will. However I like app
engine or reasons OTHER than scalability. I like the ease of use,
essentially the PAaS aspect. I love the gae apis available. I love
the dashboard. I
It seems to be that maybe it would be better/easier to just have
instance settings for tasks/cron vs user-facing instances. I
believe most people want user-facing to run fast and don't mind if
tasks/cron run slower and save them some $$$. I'd also personally
like instance settings by a time/date
I agree on both fronts.
Yes, M/S was a JOKE. Once moving to HRD I have not seen a datastore
timeout at all.
Until earlier this week I saw a small series of them. I really hope
we are not going back to what we are all used to on M/S. The old M/S
problem days were always written off as well,
I haven't posted here in a while, however I just saw my new bills with
the new pricing model.
Google,
I really really thought you would listen to your users when everybody
complained about the new billing originally. Now apparently you are
going through with it, not listening to the many
For your reading pleasure:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/02/google_app_engine_users_on_pricing_change/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
I have seen errors before in my app where IE6 was requesting urls with
keys inbedded, however the keys were all lower case. It is rare but I
have seen it. I had just written it off as some fluke.
On Aug 5, 2:12 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah the lower case thing is really
Wow, this is a little funny as Google has stated they do not approve
of this method several times in the past. However, this
keepyourappwarm app actually runs on GAE.
On Jul 9, 5:34 am, Max thebb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
you may want to take a look at this site
I think it would be hard to use production GAE + gsm modem on your
local laptop to send SMS. I'd recommend twilio.com or tropo.com for
sending SMS.
On Jul 11, 11:15 am, Vinuth Madinur vinuth.madi...@gmail.com wrote:
You can perhaps use Channel API or XMPP. Listen on a unique channel on your
In my opinion YES!
Before HRD I considered GAE a bit of a joke. So many datastore
timeouts, random errors, etc.
AFTER HRD I believe GAE is extremely stable.
If your app makes heavy use of the datstore I would highly recommend
HRD.
On Jul 5, 3:03 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
It
I feel like without the 15 minute fee this new pricing structure would
be back to the pay only for what you use model that people love so
much about GAE.
On Jul 5, 2:33 pm, Ugorji ugo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the 15 minutes is a startup fee ie a tax. And it is charged for each
instance
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gopal Patel
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:57 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Off Topic: Google Plus
i think you can create google account with your own email id, and that's
what he is using.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:29 AM, JH
I do all this with SES on a domain with google apps. Google apps only
hosts the mail, I am not aware of a dns solution by google apps. I
host my dns elsewhere.
On Jul 2, 12:23 am, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd like to switch mails to Amazon SES and register a domain with
Google
For a long time I saw alot of strange behaviors as well, but since the
relase of HRD I truely believe GAE is ready to leave preview.
On Jun 29, 8:16 am, Jeremy Wallez j.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I totally agree with you Vivek.
Personnally, I like GAE but I encountered a lot of strange behaviors
I used to get these when running Master/Slave, since moving to HRD I
haven't gotten them.
I know that the datastore should not affect startup but some people
have suggested that HRD apps are hosted in another environment. I
don't know if this is true or not but I know I haven't had this issue
drakaal at digerat.com ... ? are you using google apps to access + ?
I'd like to but I can't get profiles yet...
On Jul 1, 7:52 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Be happy to have any of you in my circle just anyway, but I believe that
Google Plus is working like vampires. If I (or
+1
Amazon route53 is definitely great for those with special needs.
However, I find it hard to believe that very many have such special
needs.
On Jun 30, 2:48 pm, Roberto Saccon rsac...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO currently the best option if you have special requirements: Amazon
route53
--
I'll agree that sometimes it's hard to understand priorities, say for
instance XMPP in general, or yes, prospective search.
All that aside, I'd encourage everyone to check out using Amazon's SES
service to send email via GAE. Their REST api works well and I
actually get fewer urlfetch timeouts
I don't know but if you are using 1.4.3 you probably want to start by
using the latest sdk, 1.5.1:
http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html
On Jun 28, 8:30 am, Refael ref...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't get it to run on production.
I get EncodeError: Message is missing required fields:
On this note, I'm very glad to see GAE coming out of preview.
I'd like to point out that some of GAE's success must be due to the
pricing scheme
pay as you go along with cheap prices. I just really hope that this
new pricing scheme
along with higher prices doesn't deter enough users so that in
Greg,
Glad to see an update to this FAQ. Unfortunately it sounds like I am
loosing the Always ON feature I like so much.
That being said, to work with this new model I would LOVE to see the
scheduler have a schedule.
For instance, my apps are primarily used by the corporate world. So
I'd like
Spam or not, coderbuddy looks pretty cool. Similar to cloud 9. I
hope to see more of these projects pop up.
On Jun 23, 9:35 pm, Branko Vukelic bg.bra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Either way, the point I was making is that
I've noticed this as well with Chrome. No idea why it happens though.
On Jun 21, 12:28 pm, kwellman kenji.well...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Google App Engine with the Flask web framework on Ubuntu and
I've had this annoying problem with Chrome (Windows) for the past
month. When I'm
These questions scare me. I'd hate to think that GAE's limited
resources would even consider implementing any more languages now.
I'd personally rather see some of the kinks worked out, along with
some new features for the existing languages. Just my 2 cents.
On Jun 17, 9:09 am, Ikai Lan
The email pricing is very competitive actually. And pretty much in
line with Amazon SES. What I would like to know is if Google has any
plans to improve mail delivery rate. For instance there are many
threads in here about yahoo flagging gae mail as spam along with
others. The reply was
:
On May 26, 10:11 am, JH ja...@tickettrackit.com wrote:
I'm actually talking about python variables. Ints, Strings, Lists,
Dicts, etc..
I don't believe there was ever such a limit. The 1MB limit is on the
API calls, which makes it impossible to have a datastore entity larger
Hopefully somebody from Google can confirm this info soon?
I have not participated in much of the new price bashing since the
initial shock of
day 1. However, to me this seems like one of the most restrictive
pricing changes of all.
If you count datastore operations by # of entities returned,
Actually you can have one version run python and another use java
On Jun 4, 6:03 pm, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
With new pricing model multiplexing multiple apps to a single app will be
cheaper for developers who have multiple apps will low traffic. It can be
done using multi-tenancy
Yes, I would LOVE to be able to map specific versions to custom
domains. This would simulate 2 different apps using the same
dataset. Thank you for pointing out this issue to star Robert.
On Jun 3, 1:36 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd also love to be able to map custom
Are you using M/S or HRD? If you're using HRD I hope these type of
posts are addressed before GAE leaves preview.
On Jun 3, 9:00 am, Dan dan.c.hoo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been seeing a lot of deadline exceed errors as well. Some
requests take over 60 seconds, but only a few hundred cpu ms.
I don't think you can downgrade your app? Production servers are
running 1.5.0.
On Jun 3, 11:44 am, Ricky Button m...@rickybutton.com wrote:
Well I seem to have just temporarily fixed the issue by downgrading to
1.4.3. I don't know if that fixed it though. It still scared the crap out of
us,
Eww, GAE would have to increase their prices 1000x before Azure could
even begin to look mildly attractive.
On Jun 1, 4:36 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
We have been porting our app to ASP.net for Azure. For small requests the
overhead for ASP is big, and for Big requests it is
I've noticed that all my HR app instances seem to stay alive for a
very long time. Google says their new scheduler will change all
this
On May 31, 5:52 am, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote:
That's called a built-in profit margin.
On May 31, 12:51 am, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.com
Can easily be done with 3rd party api's. I personally like www.tropo.com
but you could also check out twilio.com
On May 31, 8:07 am, Andrius A andriu...@gmail.com wrote:
Check Google Voice, it still hasn't got public api but you can try using
this
afford paid APIS.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:21 PM, JH ja...@tickettrackit.com wrote:
Can easily be done with 3rd party api's. I personally likewww.tropo.com
but you could also check out twilio.com
On May 31, 8:07 am, Andrius A andriu...@gmail.com wrote:
Check Google Voice, it still
I'd prefer this over the instance billing as well
On May 31, 8:36 pm, Bart Thate bth...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings !
As i understand it this whole move of Google is because they discovered that
it is the memory occupied thats is the cost factor requiring this drastic
move. So if that is the
Look into using the dos.yaml file. It does exactly what you want.
On May 30, 4:43 am, StudApps studa...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to block some IPs from accessing my site. Is there a direct way
of doing so in AppEngine?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
My bad, it would probably help more to point you to this page:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/dos.html
On May 30, 4:43 am, StudApps studa...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to block some IPs from accessing my site. Is there a direct way
of doing so in AppEngine?
--
You received
goldenfire,
you need to combine your url maps to something like,
def main():
application = webapp.WSGIApplication([('/', MainHandler),
('/guestbook',
GuestbookMain)],
debug=True)
Being that an SLA typically just means I will receive a refund for
down time, in other words a fraction of $9/month and $.08/hour, I'd
like to propose an alternative model for people to have paid apps
without an SLA. I am definitely interested in uptime, however a
refund of my $.08/hour for 30
extra instance hours a day? (gotta give me credit for trying)
15 minutes idle time billed seems a bit odd, we can't be billed for
what instance time we actually use?
Finally, still curious how always on will work..
Thanks and great work on GAE
On May 29, 12:20 pm, JH ja...@tickettrackit.com wrote
I get a 500 when refreshing google groups about 2-5% of the time.
What gives? Maybe they are based on M/S and should switch to HR?
Personally my app is almost error free since going HR. ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To
I don't mean entity size, I mean actual variable size in your code.
Like, x = 1
There used to be a limit on the size of x, but now it appears it has
been lifted... Just looking for a confirmation
On May 26, 8:42 am, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote:
Your correct so far the
I'm actually talking about python variables. Ints, Strings, Lists,
Dicts, etc..
On May 26, 8:55 am, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the data structure size confused me. Usually that refers to stored
data. Then you said variable, which JDO has.
Are you talking about
These guys have some good code:
http://detectmobilebrowser.com/
On May 25, 3:45 am, Cong Danh Ho congdanh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
How to detect mobile phone when android connect to Google App Engine !
help me !
--
*Best regards,*
This has been happening for ever. When I used to send mail with GAE i
let the task retry until success. This has been a known issue for a
long time now.
Due to alot of GAE mail being flagged as spam at yahoo and other
providers I have switched to sending my mail via Amazon SES. There is
python
I'm wondering if the reduction in mail.api quota + app engine leaving
preview means that the mail service will get an upgrade, and we will
have higher deliverability, or if I should continue using Amazon SES
for my email needs.
On May 12, 2:14 am, Kenneth kennet...@aladdinschools.com wrote:
Greg
There used to be a limit on app engine that any data structure or
variable could not be larger than 1mb. After watching some of the
Google IO videos I get the impression that limit is no longer in
place.
Can we now have variables larger than 1mb?
--
You received this message because you are
There are a few issues. First of all, I get timeouts doing
blobstore.delete which I do before writing new entries, maybe 2% of
the time. There is also an issue on returning a blob key with HR
guys, http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4872.
Also, I very rarely, like .5% of
Can we still expect a follow up on how always on will work?
On May 18, 10:55 am, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, 风笑雪 kea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Can you raise On-demand Frontend Instances free quota to 25 Instance Hours
per day?
The
No doubt when I moved to HR my instances basically quit dying. With M/
S an idle instance would be killed off quickly, with HR they hang
around for days. At the time I was very happy about this. This was a
complaint in the past (how fast Google killed idle instances.) But now
I think the
I am curious how Always On will be handled? Right now for $8.40 I
get 3 instances always on. Can I still have this? If so will I be
billed 3 * .05 * 24 * 30, or will I only be billed for the actual time
the instances are used ?
On May 12, 11:31 am, Peter Petrov onest...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
