Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Samuel Jawahar
You can know by the icon they disply,if it ? And displying NOT this message"testing skiped" On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 01:13 Felix Voituret wrote: > Well the real difference here is that you do not know if the time limit > was respected for the hidden dataset (previously

Re: [gcj] Finding another competitor on the score board?

2018-04-08 Thread Samuel Jawahar
Oh really great sir On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 01:57 Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > Right now I work at home, and my employers are both under the age of 6. :-) > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:01 PM Samuel Jawahar > wrote: > >> Thanks a lot sir,where are you working

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
Yes! Time Limit Exceeded. It's an acronym from the UVA online judge, and/or TopCoder. I admit that I was curious to see if it would be recognized. :-) Felix: That's a really good point. I had half of that realization during the round about D, and I'm glad that you expressed it so clearly. I

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Felix Voituret
Time Limit Exceed i think ? Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 8 avr. 2018 à 22:38, Leandro Coutinho a écrit : > > Thank you Bartholomew ! > > What is TLE? > Temporal lobe epilepsy? :D > > Em Dom, 8 de abr de 2018 17:27, Bartholomew Furrow > escreveu: >>

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Leandro Coutinho
Thank you Bartholomew ! What is TLE? *Temporal lobe epilepsy? :D* Em Dom, 8 de abr de 2018 17:27, Bartholomew Furrow escreveu: > I have a few thoughts, and I want to emphasize once again that although I > used to be on the Code Jam team, I no longer am. > > First: I don't

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Felix Voituret
« You can find lots of problems where there's a simple algorithm that would be correct on the Small, and incorrect (not just slow) on the Large. » The first problem of this round is typical as input structures are differents for visible / hidden datasets. Well the only thing that doesn’t

Re: [gcj] Finding another competitor on the score board?

2018-04-08 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
Right now I work at home, and my employers are both under the age of 6. :-) On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:01 PM Samuel Jawahar wrote: > Thanks a lot sir,where are you working > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 21:33 Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > >> Hey Samuel! I answered

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
I have a few thoughts, and I want to emphasize once again that although I used to be on the Code Jam team, I no longer am. First: I don't think Hidden sets are really run after the contest. At the end of the Qualification Round, all scores were visible immediately. We used to judge Large inputs

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Xiongqi ZHANG
Previously you also had to estimate the runtime for your large submission. If you started downloading the input file for large submission, and couldn’t finish before running out of time, you still lose points. The new system however, allows you to submit again if you later find a better solution

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Felix Voituret
It isn’t « worst » at all. It is different, bringing new feature at the same time. I got tricked by the large dataset in B too, and doesn’t have time this week end to check other problems, that alright, I will be aware of that next year so this is not a problem. We just have to change old

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Leandro Coutinho
Hmm good point. So CodeJam is worst now. Worst is not the best word. The previous system was really good. Em Dom, 8 de abr de 2018 17:04, Xiongqi ZHANG escreveu: > The hidden test is run after the contents ends. How is it possible to tell > you that your program will

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread Xiongqi ZHANG
The hidden test is run after the contents ends. How is it possible to tell you that your program will finish or not if it was not actually run? On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:56 PM Leandro Coutinho wrote: > Good point. > > They should let us know if the program finished on

Re: [gcj] Finding another competitor on the score board?

2018-04-08 Thread Samuel Jawahar
Thanks a lot sir,where are you working On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 21:33 Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > Hey Samuel! I answered you in chat as well, but in case anyone else is > wondering: > > I totally understand the concern. A couple of things about that: I don't > work at Google

[gcj] The Qual Round is over!

2018-04-08 Thread newbie007
Usually in the qualification round the first two problems are simple and with no tricks. I got A and B correct for the small data sets, so I assumed it was fine. But then wrong for A large and time exceed for B large. Oo Probably I was too careless, but I think CodeJam missed the qualification

Re: [gcj] Finding another competitor on the score board?

2018-04-08 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
Hey Samuel! I answered you in chat as well, but in case anyone else is wondering: I totally understand the concern. A couple of things about that: I don't work at Google anymore, so I'm the wrong person to ask to make a change. I can tell you about why we made the decision originally though. It

Re: [gcj] A problem ocurred. try again later. But then the solutions appear in submissions

2018-04-08 Thread Samuel Jawahar
it was very slow yesterday On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:07 PM, newbie007 wrote: > after some minutes the solutions are in submissions, even though it says a > "problem occurred" > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google