[gcj] Distributed Code Jam

2019-11-19 Thread eatmore
Will there be Distributed Code Jam in 2020? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion

[gcj] Interactive problems in Code Jam

2019-04-18 Thread eatmore
This post on Codeforces: https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/66578 Hi, I want to discuss interactive problems in Code Jam. Code Jam didn't have interactive problems until recently, and there are still major differences between interactive problems in Code Jam versus the other competitions where

[gcj] More problems with the new UI

2019-04-18 Thread eatmore
Hi, I'd like to share some problems with the new UI that I found during the qualification round and the round 1A: 1. The panel with questions and answers is too narrow. During the qualification round, an answer that was posted for everyone included an URL that was not displayed properly becaus

[gcj] Unofficial participation

2019-04-15 Thread eatmore
Hi, Why can't those who have advanced to Round 2 participate in sub-rounds 1B and 1C at all? I think that it would be better if they could participate unofficially (this is like participating normally, except that their results are not considered when determining who advances to Round 2). Do y

Re: [gcj] New Code Jam interface: a step back in usability

2019-04-05 Thread eatmore
> Publishing the new system and UI before competitive rounds is exactly what > we did, so people could practice on them before the actual rounds. That's > how we are discussing these several weeks before Code Jam's first round. I > haven't checked every one, but I'm pretty sure most, if not all, of

[gcj] Re: Errors in Code Jam FAQ

2019-04-05 Thread eatmore
There were no response from Code Jam admins, but the errors are now fixed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroup

[gcj] Errors in Code Jam FAQ

2019-03-25 Thread eatmore
Hi! While reading Code Jam FAQ, I found some errors: > Be aware of common problems like integer overflow and stack overflow that can > cause an otherwise correct solution to fail. The link from "stack overflow" is pointing to a Wikipedia page on integer overflow. > In an output file, if the corr

Re: [gcj] New Code Jam interface: a step back in usability

2019-03-19 Thread eatmore
Hi Pablo, I favor the idea to make a better competition platform. I'm concerned a little that major changes are made without any public announcement and discussion; I'd like Code Jam team to publish information about new and upcoming changes, so that it would be possible to learn about them bef

[gcj] New Code Jam interface: a step back in usability

2019-03-08 Thread eatmore
This post on Codeforces: https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/65800 Hi all! This year, Google has again decided to change Code Jam user interface. The new interface has already been used for Code Jam to I/O for Women and Kick Start rounds, and from what I saw, it is even worse than the last year. L

[gcj] How to ask questions during the final round?

2018-06-11 Thread eatmore
Hi! One of the features the new Code Jam platform is missing is the ability to ask questions during rounds. So far, the way to ask questions was by emailing code...@google.com. Given that using email will probably not be permitted during the final round, how do we ask questions then? -- You re

[gcj] Re: Can someone please tell me why this is generating Runtime error on codejam (TroubleSort).

2018-05-09 Thread eatmore
I'm not the OP, but still... > But before you start frantically coding a better sort method, let me ask you: > why didn't you simply use Arrays.sort from the standard library? It's > available, it's correct and it's very fast. When sorting arrays of primitive types, Arrays.sort uses Quicksort, w

Re: [gcj] Please make input/output test case data available

2018-04-27 Thread eatmore
On Friday, 27 April 2018 23:39:01 UTC+3, Pablo Heiber wrote: > Practicing in a different way than how you compete is bound to cause you > trouble. If you resort to seeing the input data when you don't know why > something is not working well, you are going to be unprepared when that > happens i

Re: [gcj] Runtime Error in C++. Solved.

2018-04-24 Thread eatmore
On Monday, 23 April 2018 18:04:11 UTC+3, Pablo Heiber wrote: > $ echo "int main() { throw; }" > test.cpp && g++ test.cpp && ./test; echo $? > terminate called without an active exception > Aborted > 134 In this case, the program didn't exit with nonzero exit code. In fact, it terminated with SIG

Re: [gcj] practice mode + downgrading other contestants' code is live on our site!

2018-04-21 Thread eatmore
What is the purpose of having two distinct modes at all? In the old system, there was no such distinction. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to go

Re: [gcj] "The judgment was skipped" is shown for a solution which is in fact correct

2018-04-06 Thread eatmore
On Friday, 6 April 2018 22:33:40 UTC+3, Pablo Heiber wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. There was indeed a bug causing this, but we thought > we fixed it, and some users reporting similar issues confirmed it was fixed > for them. Is this still happening if you see your submissions now after > re

[gcj] "The judgment was skipped" is shown for a solution which is in fact correct

2018-04-06 Thread eatmore
During the practice round, I submitted two solutions to the problem Number Guessing. The first one failed because I didn't select the language, while the second one was correct. According to the scoreboard, it passed both test sets, but in the list of submissions, it is shown that it only passed

[gcj] Practicing on old problems

2018-04-06 Thread eatmore
On the old GCJ website, it is possible to practice on old problems at any time, even without logging in. Will this be possible with the new system? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei

[gcj] Test runs

2018-03-22 Thread eatmore
Will there be an option to test my code on Code Jam server without submitting an actual solution, similarly to Testrun problem in DCJ? Most online judges permit this so that you can know how fast the server is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Googl

[gcj] Main class name in Java

2018-03-22 Thread eatmore
When solving problems in Java, Code Jam now requires the main class to be named Solution. Yet in many other online judges, there is no such limitation. Is it possible to remove it for Code Jam as well? It is very inconvenient if main classes for all problems are required to have the same name.

[gcj] Google Code Jam 2017 finals feedback

2017-09-07 Thread eatmore
A few weeks ago, I participated in Google Code Jam and Distributed Code Jam finals. Later, the finalists were asked to provide some feedback. I think that my feedback may be interesting for other people as well, so I post it here (I also posted it on Codeforces: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/

[gcj] Re: Round 3 (aka last Online Round) of Google Code Jam just finished!

2017-06-12 Thread eatmore
There is an error in the analysis of problem A: "Otherwise, it must have at least one 1 not at the start of the googlement, so it will decay into a googlement with the same digit sum but with at least one digit other than 0 or 1". This is not true. For example, googlement 010 decays into 100, wh

Re: [gcj] wrong output submitted

2017-04-14 Thread eatmore
A better idea is to insert sample test cases at random places within a test, then reject the submission if the answers for these cases are incorrect. This makes it pretty much impossible to submit a wrong output file by mistake. This is what Hacker Cup seems to be doing, very good thing to preve

[gcj] 2015 Finals analysis

2016-11-14 Thread eatmore
Hi all, Recently, Google announced the dates for the next Code Jam, as well as the location of its onsite rounds. I'm disappointed. They've chosen a location where GCJ onsite round was already held before. Again. Come on! Google has more than 70 offices (source: Google), enough to have each GCJ

[gcj] Analysis of last year's Code Jam finals

2016-08-15 Thread eatmore
When looking through past problems, I found that the analysis for 2015 Code Jam finals has yet to be published. It would be a good thing to do, as the finals' problems are pretty difficult and most people won't be able to solve them on their own. Having analyses published for both this year's r

[gcj] Re: Round 3 analysis thread - crowd source attemp

2016-06-27 Thread eatmore
> I thought I'd start a thread with the aim to cover all questions of round 3. There is already one: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/45358 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

[gcj] What can be used during GCJ finals?

2016-06-17 Thread eatmore
Hi, 1. On the Code Jam Finals website, and also in the Terms and Conditions, it is said that during the Finals, the contestants are only permitted to use Google-provided equipment. A list of preinstalled software is also provided, but the versions are rather old. So, the question: what options,

[gcj] Re: Round 3 Problem D(Go++) small

2016-06-11 Thread eatmore
Each program must contain at least one instruction. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[gcj] Testrun problem on DCJ Practice Round

2016-06-08 Thread eatmore
In the previous DCJ Practice Round, there were all problems from prior DCJ rounds except one: Testrun. Testrun problem is very helpful because it allows to measure the time it takes to do something on the server without having to solve anything. While a fairly similar result may be achieved duri

Re: [gcj] Test case availability for DCJ

2016-06-01 Thread eatmore
In a solution to a contest problem, it may be even better to do auto M = new long long[N]; or even declare a global array of fixed size. Of course, both methods are not suitable for real-world programs. Also, the latter approach tends to fail on Windows, probably because it lacks support for

[gcj] Suggested improvements for DCJ

2016-05-31 Thread eatmore
Hi, I want to suggest certain improvements to Distributed Code Jam website and system. I already reported that unregistered users can't download sample inputs during the rounds (and for a short period afterwards), but this is not all. 1. I noticed that Distributed FAQ page now states the exact