Same issue here. Updated an hour ago.
FF 23.0.1
Scientific Linux 64bit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:59:48 PM UTC+2, Shaun Tarves wrote:
I am defining several elements via UiBinder. My understanding is these are
created as com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element during the createAndBind
call.
I would like to add a click handler to one of these elements. Is there
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 12:02:24 PM UTC+2, Nuno Godinho de Matos wrote:
It runs the DevMode main class, ture.
But I am quite certain mvn gwt:run is fueling me the compiled javascript.
The project compilation time is huge for making the gecko_1_3 and safari
permutations (since I am
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:51:15 PM UTC+2, Amit Chavan wrote:
I created a GWT project [without using the option of generate sample
code]. I have added Entry Point class, html page, module file. The
bootstrap js file is getting generated under
war/com.travelpeeps.travelpeeps folder
Are you running DevMode in Chrome?
See https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778
On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 12:52:55 PM UTC+2, stole wrote:
I am getting this error:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: invoke arguments: JS value of type
number, expected
Similar issue. FF crashes on startup, reset FF in safe mode solves the
issue until gwt plugin is re-installed, then it starts crashing again.
Windows 7 64-bit
On Friday, August 16, 2013 5:42:01 AM UTC-4, GraÅžvydas Valeika wrote:
Hi,
I just updated FF to 23. And I see strange behavior.
Hi,
I am trying to use the HeaderPanel to set a Header/Footer and an resizing
ContentPanel (which contains a CellTable).
The problem is that unlike other LayoutPanel classes the vertical size is
not enforced on the content widget, its width is set to 100% but the height
is not set.
I don't
On Monday, August 19, 2013 4:06:07 PM UTC+2, stuckagain wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the HeaderPanel to set a Header/Footer and an resizing
ContentPanel (which contains a CellTable).
The problem is that unlike other LayoutPanel classes the vertical size is
not enforced on the
Thomas,
But reality is a bit different, the layout panels are actively changing
widget sizes, except the HeaderPanel.
Additionally the forceLayout is a private method in this Layout widget, not
that it matters to me in this case.
But Ok, I have a workaround in that I set the pixel size myself. I
Hi,
Does anyone else see the same issue?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Harsh
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Harsh Yadav harsh.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Found in GWT 2.5
*Encountered on OS / Browser:*
Mac OSX 10.8.4, Chrome, Safari. This is not an issue on Firefox.
*Detailed
I can only see the issue happening when the page loads or when changing the
browser size which make the second scroll bar appear sometimes. However
scrolling itself works as expected.
Looks like a weird CustomScrollPanel rendering bug i WebKit/Blink. Not sure
if thats caused by GWT code.
--
But reality is a bit different, the layout panels are actively changing
widget sizes, except the HeaderPanel.
This is happening because HeaderPanel isn't a LayoutPanel and does not use
one internally.
To fully mimic the LayoutPanel behavior you would need to add
position:absolute; top,
Hello folks,
I just wanted to remind everyone that the last day to fund this project is
this Friday, August 23.
I've been using this framework in production in my app now for 2 months,
and it works great. Have logged 70,000 perfect stack traces so far!
Already fixed 3 major bugs in my
Sorry - totally new at GWT - have not even read the manuals yet.
Any guidance welcome.
Inquisitor Ravenor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I spent most of Friday reading up on Editor Framework and it seemed quite
powerful and useful. But today I'm looking at actually making use of it and
I've had some fairly basic questions which I have not been able to find
answers to in this group or anywhere on Google/gwtproject.org.
1) Does
In my humble opinion, the editor framework is by far one of the cooolest
and most important features found in GWT. For some reason it doesn't seem
to be something that gets used a lot, at least I haven't seen a lot of
people using it.
Your questions:
1) It doesn't have to be used with UI Binder.
I've managed a simple AutoBean with a list. Now I've a more complex one,
and I don't understand what's wrong. My get methods are returning null
though the debugger shows the object has data.
The JSON looks like this:
{
mquery:
{
screenname:Index Card,
fields:
{
Howdy,
When I tried to run GWT quick start
tutorial I got this error message!
How can I fix this issue?
I already installed GWT Developer plugin for Firefox 1.23
I installed eclipse from ubuntu 13.04 repository (version
3.8.1)
I
On 08/20/2013 02:06 AM, Muhammad Bashir
Al-Noimi wrote:
Howdy,
When I tried to run GWT quick
start tutorial I got this error message!
How can I fix this issue?
I already installed GWT Developer plugin
It seems that you don't have the Servlet API on your classpath upon
compilation. If you're using Maven, make sure that you put the servlet api
dependency on the pom.xml with a scope = compile. This will include the
servlet api on compilation, but exclude it on the deployment.
We need to exclude
re: Heiko Braun
it means having an optional compilation path that does not recompile the
entire world (as the current monolithic compile path does) and instead
tries to recompile just files (or or modules) that have changed.
it is exploratory work for me right now as there are very many issues
Hello folks,
I just wanted to remind everyone that the last day to fund this project is
this Friday, August 23.
I've been using this framework in production in my app now for 2 months,
and it works great. Have logged 70,000 perfect stack traces so far!
Already fixed 3 major bugs in my
Interesting. I like the idea of replacing class parameters with something
else. I'm not sure we need to sweep the implementation under the rug.
Particularly in fancier scenarios, it might be easier to work with it
explicitly.
Suppose we have:
/** Encapsulates a GWT create call. */
interface
23 matches
Mail list logo
