easily cross 1.5 MB
I don't agree with easily.
A few things:
- Perform efficient coding.
- Use Soyc to optimize your code splitting.
- Transferring the files gzipped between browser and server will deliver a
file reduction of about 50%..
- Using multiple modules if size is getting too big.
-
I opened the issue 6603 for that problem :
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6603
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Many thanks Thomas for your clear explanation...You're right, in
development mode the GWT-JVM is actually executing the application
code as compiled Java bytecode, as described at GWT Doc [1] :), and
no JS is generated. So, pretty mode for JS generation doesn't make
sense here.
Hallmit
[1]
it looks like we can't keep up with the development speed of Mozilla :
(
As they now released FF 9 the plugin is incompatible (yet again).
Alan, can you compile it again in your usual speed and timelieness :)
Your fans you would carry you on their shoulders, vistually ;)
--
You received this
there have been several posts on RequestFactory security, but I am still
not clear. the sample code here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/expenses/src/main/java/com/google/gwt/sample/gaerequest/#gaerequest
uses a filter to determine if a user can access
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:18:25 PM UTC+1, EMan wrote:
there have been several posts on RequestFactory security, but I am still
not clear. the sample code here:
Many ways to do this. ViewImpl.ui.java will have a binding for the
composite widget
So you can simply pass the presenter or the instance of
ViewImpl.ui.java to the composite widget.
@UiField MyCompositeWidget theWidget;
.. theWidget.setParent(this)
Or you can use @UiField(provided=true)
I find Spring Security to be a viable and simple solution to use while
giving you a range of possibilities for both Authentication and
Authorization. You get exactly that method to add the check (probably
based on some annotation on the method). as one of the options.
See:
how can i create a marquee in gwt ? is there any library available
for this in gwt .
i tried in this group previous posts there is no proper information
available .
can any one help me !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To
We are seeing a huge increase in the compilation time after upgrading
from GWT version 1.7 to 2.3. Given below is a comparison of the
compile time that we are seeing for one language and one browser.
It does not seem to be related to code splitting or IE9 support.
Has anyone else noticed such an
Hi to all,
I'm fairly a beginner in GWT and Maven and I did try to find the answer to
the this problem in the archive but didn't succeed.
So I have the following problem. I've developed a GWT (ver 2.4) application
coupled with Spring Framework and Maven as a build tool and for the sake of
Hi,
I have a situation where I am using Dictionary to load messages.
I want to load DateTimeConstants , NumberConstants in the same way..
Is there any solution for this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this
Hi,
I am using gwt i18ncreator script to generate the java interface. But
i am getting the error
java.io.IOException: Cannot run program chmod: CreateProcess
error=2, The system cannot find the file specified.
Read from the internet that the i18nCreator will not work. is it so?
Is there any
hi,
i need a file-upload like it is used in Google+ and want to implement
it in a gwt-project. In GWT i can only find a FileUpload with single
selection. I hope you can help me because i don't want to use a
javascript solution.
Best regards,
Robert Fix
--
You received this message because you
did you try gwt-upload ?
2011/12/21 Robert Fix rob3rt...@googlemail.com
hi,
i need a file-upload like it is used in Google+ and want to implement
it in a gwt-project. In GWT i can only find a FileUpload with single
selection. I hope you can help me because i don't want to use a
javascript
I've had a similar problem before. I am using maven and doing a Run
as Maven Clean followed by a Run as Maven Install corrected the
problem for me. By the way, my maven pom was modified from the
Expenses sample app's pom.
On Dec 20, 8:01 am, Mike Breytenbach mikebreytenb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Try server:ssl/server or -Dgwt.server=:ssl
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/run-mojo.html#server
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
What is the size of the resulting application in both cases?
Quite a few new compiler optimizations went into GWT between 1.7 and 2.3,
so I would expect compilation time to increase quite a bit if you have all
of those new optimization turned on.
There are compiler flags you can turn on to
For reference:
try draftCompile and maybe only compile certain models with only certain
permutation.
$ java -cp gwt-dev.jar com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler
Missing required argument 'module[s]'
Google Web Toolkit 2.4.0
Compiler [-logLevel level] [-workDir dir] [-gen dir] [-style style] [-ea]
Also, the reference was for 2.4 not sure of exact changes for 2.3 but you
can easily run the command
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi everybody!
I have two weeks trying to implement RequestFactory, I've done my data
classes model, locators, proxies, etc, but I simply can't get it to
work. I've tried all configurations suggested on Starting With Requst
Factory Page, but I still get the same problem.
When the line
Hi everybody!
I have two weeks trying to implement RequestFactory, I've done my data
classes model, locators, proxies, etc, but I simply can't get it to
work. I've tried all configurations suggested on Starting With Requst
Factory Page, but I still get the same problem.
When the line
Can the plugin be made to work on the current stable release of Firefox 9
as well? Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
When you say never reaches the server side, you mean it never reaches
your own code, right? Have you looked at the server logs?
You might be interested by
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_4#RequestFactorySource_and_Annotation_Processing
too,
which is
Thomas, thanks for the feedback. I included the log4j-over-slf4j, jcl-
over-slf4j, and jul-to-slf4j jars in my project, but I still do not
see anything logged in my logback files. When you stated that I
needed to configure the slf4j bridge, do you know if there is anything
else I need to do
On Dec 15, 8:14 pm, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you should file a bug for this and/or maybe post this issue in the
Google Web Toolkit Contributors group.
Would be great if you can narrow your issue down to a very simple GWT app.
-- J.
Ok, I will try to create a mini-app
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:07 PM, MagusDrk magus@googlemail.com wrote:
never reaches the server side. All error detail is a Server Error:
null (absolutelly nothing else)
RequestFactoryServlet by default catches all exceptions and returns them to
the client, without stack-traces or much
GWT has an animation api. You can use this to create a marquee.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Katta Vijay katta.vij...@gmail.com wrote:
how can i create a marquee in gwt ? is there any library available
for this in gwt .
i tried in this group previous posts there is no proper information
Here is my snippets of the more formalized version I'm now using with most
of the classes as snippets:
http://c.gwt-examples.com/home/wrapping/event-binding
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the
Have a look at:
+ gwt logging:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideLogging.html
+ gwt-log: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-log/
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-log/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this
Not sure. The official xulrunner sdk was not release until today. I am
currently testing it.
I'll keep everyone updated.
-Alan
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Samyem Tuladhar sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the plugin be made to work on the current stable release of Firefox 9
as well? Thanks.
Why not create the marque as html text and wrap it a HTML widget. You can
wrap this all in a Composite widget.
Or create a Marquee class that extends Widget and create your own marquee
Element in the constructor (just like other widgets as Label and HTML).
Then add public methods to modify/set
Ed, I have followed all of the guidelines as documented in the first
link you sent. Again, I am able to direct the log output to my
logback-managed files, but only if I use the RemoteLoggingServiceImpl
and RemoteLoggingServiceUtil custom classes I created that use the
slf4j Logger and LogFactory
Make sure you correctly install the jul bridge: SLF4JBridgeHandler.install()
when your app starts.
See: http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.html
If that doesn't work, then debug it, and you will quickly find out what
goes wrong.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Keith
Hi, Thomas, I've read the RequestFactorySource and Annotation
Processing. I have already the requestfactory-apt.jar referenced as it
is shown in the link bellow, but it doesn't seem to be the problem.
Right now I'm trying to implement something in order to catch the
server side exception as Aidan
Aidan, thanks by your answer.
When I said my server side is not reached, I reffer to some
breakpoints in the back-end wich are never reached on debug mode (in
the Service class in server side). just after calling the fire method,
the debug stake catches another breakpoint in the onFailure method
Hi Aaron,
Did you ever find a way to make this work? I'm running in to the same
problem. I have an app that currently compiles to about 12mb of
javascript, but that single large file is killing my load times on IE.
I tried splitting it at my most logical spots, which causes about 100
It is not me that is entering the width=22, the value 22 is
programatically injected by {res.refreshButton.getWidth}.
The error message is complaining because the function getWidth does
not return a String.
I also try to use tables as little as possible, but in this case I
have to use one in
Hi Mathieu, I'm cross-posting to the Google Plugin for Eclipse group to
make sure the right folks see this. Also, please file the issue here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-plugin-for-eclipse/issues/list
Thanks,
/dmc
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Mathieu Clavel math.cla...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all again! I've just tried to use a CustomRequestFactoryServlet in
order to catch and resolve the NPE in the server side. I could do it,
but the catched error was NullPointerException with no other info
(at all), no strackTrace, no specific cause (just null) and no
location specified! Help,
Give this a try:
Start in debug mode,
1 - Get the app ready to fire() your request,
*then*
2 - In eclipse, add Java Exception Breakpoint on
java.lang.NullPointerException - make sure 'caught exceptions' is ticked.
3 - Make your app fire() the request.
You should drop into debug mode when the NPE
myFileUpload.getElement().setPropertyBoolean(multiple, true);
On Dec 21, 5:39 am, Robert Fix rob3rt...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi,
i need a file-upload like it is used in Google+ and want to implement
it in a gwt-project. In GWT i can only find a FileUpload with single
selection. I hope you
Looking forward to the good news, but it is really annoying that the
extension is incompatible after firefox upgrades every time, especially
today firefox updates much more frequently.
Anyway, thanks so much, Alan!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
When we works on development mode this error comes generally because
of our outOfMemory issue if you see on jetty server it will show you
the outOfMemory issue.
We all know that our development mode depends on our system's memory .
So either increase the memory or check it on web mode
On Dec
Hi,
Can anyone help me out in clearing the contents of the fileupload
widget.
I mean for textbox we write textBox.setText() to clear the content
of it, is there anyway to clear the FIleupload also.
Thanks in Advance
rahul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
+1 for the idea!
(I know Closure has it, and the HTML5 History API has a replaceState in
addition to pushState; and there's been a few requests on the forum to
add this feature to GWT)
There *will* be a need to override nativeReplace, at least in
HistoryImplIE6.
Also, I haven't checked but I'm
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1619803/diff/7001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueListBox.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueListBox.java (right):
I am one of these guys who loves to have a null value in a ListBox to be
able to deselect things in a ListBox.
So my server just gives me a,b,c and I call setAcceptableValues() with
this list without any call to setValue() before (new view, activity loads
list of acceptable values and just
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:36 PM, rda...@google.com wrote:
On second thought, even though List and Set are the two that are
technically allowed, there's really no problem with JSON-RPC and the
encoding of a
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
I am one of these guys who loves to have a null value in a ListBox to be
able to deselect things in a ListBox.
So my server just gives me a,b,c and I call setAcceptableValues() with
this list without any call to setValue()
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1619803/diff/7001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueListBox.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueListBox.java (right):
Wouldn't this patch break the app behavior for everyone that has
implemented it like this?
Yes.
So my List now contains null anyways.
Good! :-)
I guess the idea of merging acceptable values with the selected value is the
root issue here.
Agreed. The javadoc for HasConstrainedValue
The idea and initial implementation looks good, but most of the
complexity and implementation details are due to cross-browser issues.
In particular, we left out functionality that we couldn't implement
consistently across all browsers, and my recollection is that this was
one of those cuts.
It
Based on Thomas' comments, I'm inclined to leave it, but I agree that
unit tests need to be put in place. Those will be in a forthcoming CL.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1618806/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2011/12/21 16:23:03, jat wrote:
The idea and initial implementation looks good, but most of the
complexity and
implementation details are due to cross-browser issues. In
particular, we left
out functionality that we couldn't implement consistently across all
browsers,
and my
committed as r10806
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1618804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
56 matches
Mail list logo
