I've not seen anything like that with any of my animations in 1.5rc2
maybe you could post your code that is causing the error?
-jason
On Aug 28, 2008, at 11:23 AM, TiMeZoNe wrote:
can anyone help me, please?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Bob Vawter did a presentation during the Google I/O conference that
addressed an issue similar to this.
Rather than using a static host page, and making RPC calls at startup,
you could use a JSP or servlet, and embed the initial data right into
the page to be parsed at startup, no
the @override annotations need to go away
and the onSuccess should be
public void onSuccess(String result) rather than Object since you
defined the callback as AsyncCallbackString
see if those two things don't get you a little closer.
-jason
On Aug 28, 2008, at 1:52 PM, EJ Blom wrote:
Chrome uses the Webkit engine so the GWT DOM implementation for Chrome
is the same as for Safari, therefor, no need for separate support
-jason
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:43 AM, matias_warrior wrote:
What about a GWT DOM impl for Chrome?
On Sep 3, 7:24 am, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Ian Bambury wrote:
I thought I just said that - well, three hours ago -
Maybe you did ... I start writing a response, then forget to press
send for a few hours, so when my mail window makes it back to the top
of the stack, and I finish up, I very well could be
oh, here it is!
Your fist post arrived at 10:28 my time, and this one at 10:55 my time.
There must be some crazy time warp thing in the google data centers ...
-jason
On Sep 3, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Ian Bambury wrote:
Chrome uses Google's version of WebKit (whick is a fork of KHTML),
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Sumit Chandel wrote:
Hi Kwame,
I just tried to reproduce the issue with the code snippet below and
didn't have any problems with displaying the ListBox. I tried this
on Firefox 2 with GWT 1.5 and used the standard stylesheet
(inherits
The gwt.js and xxx.nocache.html files have been replaced by
xxx.nocache.js.
However, if you were hacking around in those files in 1.3, then you'll
want to watch Bob Vawter's presentation on resource bundles and
linkers. It'll show you how you can have the compiler simply generate
what
__widgetID=0
instead of cellSpacing= 0 for example.
Is there a solution for this behavior of ie-explorer?
On 13 Aug., 23:23, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While looking at Peterk's issue with XMLParser, I've found what I
think is likely a bug in GWTs deserialization of String
Number 1 is actually very important. If you are going to use
Window.open it has to be done as a direct result of a user action,
otherwise popup blockers will prevent the window from being opened.
This means that you can't place the Window.open command in a callback
or any kind of deferred
does your object have public getters and setters?
-jason
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Barry wrote:
Hi ...
I have a (relatively) simple project that demonstrates an RPC failure
that I don't know how to fix. There are two remote calls. SimpleCall
returns an integer and succeeds both in
HTTPRequest is deprecated, you should consider using RequestBuilder
JSON is fine for trusted sources, and the parsing (de-serializing) is
actually pretty instantaneous if you use the JS Overlay techniques
(direct evaluation) available in GWT 1.5.
Of course, if you are getting JSON from a
and setters???
Thanks!
On Sep 19, 8:10 am, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does your object have public getters and setters?
-jason
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Barry wrote:
Hi ...
I have a (relatively) simple project that demonstrates an RPC
failure
that I don't know how to fix
1) yes - new and migrated projects
2) yes - but migrating as fast as possible
3) no - hope to be using 1.6+
4) no
5) no - unless the 1.6 dev cycle spins out of control
6) no
7) as soon as all of my current projects are migrated
-jason
On Sep 22, 2008, at 3:57 PM, John Gunther wrote:
Trying
AJAX (Asynchronous Javascript and XML) really only implies the client
side technology, and GWT is server agnostic (with the exception of GWT-
RPC). So, Sure, you can use whatever you want on the server.
You build up your request on the client using the RequestBuilder
class. The data that
Sure, it is a very reasonable thing to do.
Some notes though,
Lazy instantiation would be good, particularly if you have many
services that won't necessarily be used in a particular service.
And I put the singleton into the xxxServiceAsync interface rather than
the xxxService interface.
well sure, RequestCallback is an interface that has just 2 methods
onError(Request request);
and
onResponseReceived(Request req, Response res);
your inline class implements 2 methods:
onError() and onRequestReceived()
onRequestReceived is not part of the interface, and doesn't really
belong
You are going to get this from quite a few people, but Don't return
Object. when you do that GWT is forced to generate serializers for
every serializable type in the known world ... whether you use it or
not. This will cause quite a bit of extra code to be generated.
Do a search on this
you need to read this explanation:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f
It talks specifically about RPC, but it is relevant to all
Asynchronous calls.
-jason
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:47 PM, slow wrote:
Thank you Jason for your help. That was
http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-
doc-1-5s=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5t=DevGuideHistory
-jason
On Oct 7, 2008, at 2:12 AM, hooly.jia wrote:
hello!
I build a new project, and add some panel in the project. but my
project can't use back/forward button of browser.
Since creating a usable server side configuration in the embedded
servlet container is all but impossible for anything but the simplest
projects, I think that the choice of embedded server is a non-issue.
Since complicated configurations aren't really something you want to
address in the
It already is! have a look at -noserver
My project requires a full blown JEE container, not just a servlet
engine, so neither tomcat nor jetty would be enough. I have been using
-noserver since the beginning and it works great.
If the embedded server doesn't fit your needs (no matter what
You'll want to generate pdf on the server side ...
Have a look at iText, or JasperReports for PDF generation or Reporting
solutions respectively.
-jason
On Oct 15, 2008, at 2:05 AM, sridhar wrote:
Hi all,
I have generated some graphs using gwt's GChart.jar.Now i want that
graphs to
are you guys increasing the stack space for the compiler? -Xmx and -
Xms jvm args?
-jason
On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Dominik Steiner wrote:
I get the same StackOverflowError but on a version build from the
1.5.2 trunk on the 30th of September.
I also have a big application and I get
is a good one, but he
probably meant -Xss (-Xmx is heap space).
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
are you guys increasing the stack space for the compiler? -Xmx and -
Xms jvm args?
-jason
On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Dominik Steiner wrote:
I
Has to be since it is not possible to have the same object in two
different places in DOM at one time.
In fact, you can test that by doing:
public void onModuleLoad() {
Button btn = new Button(button);
RootPanel.get().add(btn);
Of course this is expected behavior! When you are talking about time,
that time is relative to your location. Just because it is noon where
you are, doesn't mean it is noon where I am.
If you are in New York, and post a schedule to your server that
indicates that you will be having a
previous post?
Thanks
On Oct 18, 9:08 am, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course this is expected behavior! When you are talking about time,
that time is relative to your location. Just because it is noon where
you are, doesn't mean it is noon where I am.
If you are in New York
You'll need to do that from the server side ... GWT is bound by what
is possible in JavaScript on a web browser, and connecting directly to
an email server is not.
You can certainly create an email UI that runs in the browser, send
the parts of the email (body, to, from, etc) to the
AM, andres ospina wrote:
i like to have the code for implement in my web siti
2008/10/20 Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll need to do that from the server side ... GWT is bound by what
is possible in JavaScript on a web browser, and connecting directly to
an email server
the quick answer is to put everything you want executed AFTER the RPC
completes into a method, call that method from the onSuccess() of your
AsyncCallback.
-jason
On Oct 21, 2008, at 5:51 AM, Edu wrote:
Hello, I like to know since i can wait for a rpc, have tried with
timer, but there is
I've seen that happen, the download stopped before you received the
whole file. if the file on your filesystem is smaller than what Google
claims the file should be, then you don't have a complete archive, and
no amount of repairing is going to help you unzip it.
Just try downloading it
, at 9:08 AM, Jim Freeze wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jason Essington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although you could certainly return the bytes of an image via RPC,
once you have them on the client side, there is no way to actually
turn those bytes into an image (or even save those
RPC uses XHR internally and as such is bound by the browsers Same
Origin Policy. Simply ... No, RPC will not connect to a server that is
different than the one the host page was loaded from.
-jason
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:34 AM, vaibhav saxena wrote:
HI groups,
i am doing the pocs over
GWT-RPC uses Java Servlets on the server side. apache + mod_php
doesn't directly support servlets, so you'd have to install a servlet
container as well (tomcat or jetty for instance). however, the better
option, if the rest of your application is written in PHP would be to
just forgo
of the originating app, so you'll have to work a little
harder at getting the proper URL path.
-jason
On Oct 24, 2008, at 11:22 PM, vaibhav saxena wrote:
Hi Jason Essington
You are right that rpc will connect to server from which the host
page is generating but in my project approach is little bit
Right, if you want to enumerate the fieldnames of a JSON object, then
you'd probably have to use the JSON parser.
You could probably use a JSNI method in an overlay type to return an
array of field names, then have another JSNI method in the object that
would return the field, the problem
Technically no, that's like saying I have this tire here, how do I
cast it to a pickup truck? I want to use it to haul a couch. That
isn't even a reasonable thing to expect ...
HOWEVER ...
Some widgets have a static wrap() method that allow you to connect
elements that exist in DOM to the
if your JSON is coming from a trusted source, you really should have a
look at overlay types in GWT. It is much simpler (and faster) than
mucking about with the JSON parser.
-jason
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Brian wrote:
Sounds pretty good. Seems like I spend half my time typing:
int n
The current RPC wire format is asymetric, meaning that the same object
going to the server will look different than coming from the server.
There also isn't really a published spec for the RPC wire format as it
tends to change from version to version of GWT.
In GWT, this is not an issue
it is really pretty easy using JSNI
public static native closeWindow(JavascriptObject myWindow)/*-
{ myWindow.close(); }-*/;
HOWEVER, you can only close windows that you open, and to close them,
you have to have a reference to the window object. Since GWTs
Window.open() doesn't return
you don't do it that way ...
you've got a bunch of bytes returned to your RPC that you can do
nothing with ...
I have a service that builds reports like this, and it opens a new
window (has to do this as a direct result of a user action otherwise
it'll be blocked by popup blockers), sends
.
Theres some default place
to put that on server?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo Cardoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm thats ok , thanks for the prompt help!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you don't do it that way ...
you've got
you shouldn't be deploying gwt-user.jar, but rather gwt-
servlet.jar ... it omits all of the stuff required for development,
but undesirable in deployment.
-jason
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Harsha wrote:
When we deploy the webapplication with gwt-user.jar to JBoss, we are
getting
] wrote:
I think I understand where this questions leads us. He's asking why
doesn't GWT distribution just put the servlet API in a separate jar
instead of bundling it inside gwt-user.jar :-)
On Nov 4, 8:37 am, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you shouldn't be deploying gwt-user.jar
gwt-foo.jar to bother with and
still leaves open the possibility for people to mistakenly deploy
gwt-foo.jar.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Jason Essington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would allow people to mistakenly deploy the gwt-user.jar rather
than the correct lib (gwt-servlet.jar
That's correct, The whole point of ImageBundle is that it combines all
of the images into a single file, and then uses clipping at runtime to
only show the portion related to a particular image.
The idea here is to reduce the request count, and byte count overall
for a page.
-jason
On Nov
The .cmd script for windows is initially created when you run the
applicationCreator. To get those files on your mac, you can rerun the
applicationCreator there (always backup your project first :-)
Another option (as Olivier said) is to create a launcher in your IDE
to do the job that the
That's funny, because my windows open, and I can get music ... of
course my car is a Jeep.
Maybe you shouldn't have implemented IsSilent, and IsSubmarine
-jason
On Nov 11, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Ian Bambury wrote:
Well, normally these things work, so without some kind of indication
of what
Well in general the code is probably filled with syntax errors when
using the Java 1.4 compiler ...
And since GWT 1.5.x is not compatible with the Java 1.4 compiler I
would consider this a non issue.
Since GWT 1.5 is not compatible with Java 1.4 I would not expect it to
work and the
sure, and in fact it is quite common to use the same code in both
places.
The easy way to do this is to consolidate that shared code into a
particular package ... something like com.foo.bar.shared
Then create a new GWT.xml file com/foo/bar.Shared.gwt.xml and add
source path=shared/
your
not sure I understand the need for the System.currentTimeMillis() ...
Simply doing new Date(); would be the same as what you are doing ...
Date initializes with a current time of NOW if you don't supply a time.
-jason
On Nov 10, 2008, at 2:35 PM, bw wrote:
It seems the problem only occurs
.
Is this a similar way, to creating a module
Jason Essington wrote:
sure, and in fact it is quite common to use the same code in both
places.
The easy way to do this is to consolidate that shared code into a
particular package ... something like com.foo.bar.shared
Then create a new GWT.xml
once you step into JSNI, you are in the javascript world, accessing
java objects is a bit more complicated than in non-JSNI methods.
http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-
doc-1-5s=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5t=DevGuideJavaFromJavaScript
-jason
On Nov 17, 2008, at 9:29 AM,
If you search this forum, someone just released a SOAP api for GWT ...
However, the GWT client side is bound by SOP (Same Origin Policy) so
you'll not be able to connect to random web services on random servers
directly from the client. The web browser will not allow it.
-jason
On Nov 20,
many gwt widgets already have animations!
Have a look at Tree, and DialogBox for example.
At the very least the existing animated Widgets will give you an idea
of how to animate your own Widgets.
Using the new animation classes in GWT I have been able to remove all
references to external
Actually, allowing Hosted mode to violate SOP would lead to even more
problems come deployment time...
The idea with hosted mode is that it mirrors an actual browser as
nearly as possible, so by breaking (not fixing) the SOP behavior,
developers are likely to run into issues where
GWT is mostly client side technology, so DAO never really comes into
play, that is more of a server side implementation detai.
-jason
On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:02 PM, rizla wrote:
Hi to everyone
..how I can see a code example of an implementation of GWT with DAO
pattern?
many thanks to all :D
firebug (or
Web Inspector) could help you out ...
-jason
On 1 dez, 15:55, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simplest thing to do would be to put your module files in your
war, that way the module and your service implementation are in the
same context, and you can do
does GWT.getHostPageBaseURL() help you out any?
-jason
On Dec 6, 2008, at 3:50 PM, funwithgwt wrote:
Hi,
Question 1:
My URL in hosted mode looks like this:
http://localhost:/com.mywebsite.MyBlog/MyBlog.html
I would like the application to be launced in hosted mode so that it
looks
select: Run - Build Configurations
Then pick you launcher from the list on the left
select the classpath tab, and add your required jar there
Of course JDBC drivers only work on the server side, and not in client
code.
-jason
On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
GWT-RPC uses the browsers XMLHTTPRequest mechanism. As such, it is
required to use the same protocol and port used to load your host page
(to avoid running afoul of the Same Origin Policy).
So, if your host page is loaded via HTTP port 80 the RPC uses HTTP
port 80 ... if you are in hosted
The assumption was that you wanted to communicate to a different
server (than your GWT module came from) via SOAP, which is
particularly difficult to do with a web browser due to Same Origin
Policy. which would require GWT - rpc to your server - SOAP to
remote server
However if you are
SOP says that XHRs can only connect to the domain that the host page
was loaded from.
So, of you have
http://www.domain1.com/gwt-app/SomePage.html
it doesn't matter where that page gets the GWT module from
script type=text/javascript
That's correct, onChange fires after the text box looses focus, but
you can listen to onkeypress. onKeypress is fired before the text box
is updated allowing you to cancel the keypress if desired. The trick
is to use DeferredCommand.addCommand() to handle the text.
public void
Thomas is correct here. onAttach() performs some very important
functions related to widget behavior, so if you are not careful (to
call super.onAttach()) then you would end up with broken widgets if
you override that method. It is useful to override onAttach() if you
need to perform some
At one time there was a feature request for this very thing:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=686
It seemed that Google Page Creator truncated filenames that were
longer than a certain length. Since page creator has been deprecated,
it may no longer be relevant,
I use this technique in eclipse and it works as expected.
if you want to use your JPA objects in your GWT [client] code
(caution, there be dragons here) then you will need to add a reference
to the JPA project in the GWT project.
Also, you'll need your JPA objects to be translateable, and
You could try attaching a cache-buster to the url ... append a
timestamp or something to prevent the URL from being the same each time.
-jason
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:15 AM, dhoffer wrote:
My application makes extensive use of displaying dynamic images via
the image#setUrl() method.
The
compiling down to javascript that ultimately is going to
end up running in a browser ... some versions of which are decidedly
hostile towards web developers.
-jason
-Dave
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Jason Essington
jason.essing...@gmail.com wrote:
You could try attaching a cache-buster
yet.
Regarding the cache, in my mind a good object API would provide a
boolean to enable/disable caching. But what is even worse is caching
that doesn't show any image.
-Dave
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Jason Essington
jason.essing...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 12:22 PM
Not really. It is just a way to organize code. once it is compiled,
everything becomes a monolithic obfuscated JS codebase, so one module
or a dozen would end up pretty much the same after compilation.
-jason
On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:18 PM, banty_shaily wrote:
Hi,
Does creating more
Generally things like Class1$Class2$Class3.class are due to inner
classes in the java source, and those files are generated and named by
the compiler.
Dunno about properties files using that format.
-jason
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:55 PM, jchimene wrote:
Hi,
Would someone please post a
Correct, you cannot read the post parameters from the client, as they
don't really exist.
An HTTP post supplies the post parameters as the content of the
request (server) and they are no longer available when the response is
returned (client)
you would have to parse the parameters on the
Judging from the error message something in GWT is attempting to
access an object from outside of GWT ... $wnd.Ext.StatuBar ... and
that object does not exist ...
This is likely to mean that you have either forgotten to add the
script tag for that external library, or the file is not where
That is correct!
Label will wrap either span or div elements. if you want to wrap other
elements there may already be other widgets that work with them.
The only thing to be aware of is, if at sometime in the lifespan of
your page you remove that element, or dispose of the widget, be sure
Unfortunately, what you are asking is akin to wanting a step by step
tutorial for building a whole neighborhood using a hammer ...
The thing is, GWT is just one component of a larger ecosystem, and you
would need to identify the other parts as well. GWT is not a complete
solution for
There is a feature request for a UL and LI widget, however they are
not yet included ... however, they aren't that difficult to create,
I've had to do it for a couple of projects.
You can use FlowPanel as your guide, and create similar widgets using
the ul and li element. you could add
The compiled javascript in any form is probably less than useful to
anyone wanting to reuse the code.
probably the simplest solution would be to package the source up into
a jar (or a zip file) and place a link in comments just before your
script tag that loads the module
!-- source code
Are you developing / testing on IE? I think that you can only create
(set) the id of an element the moment it is created.
At any rate, I think you are going about your task all wrong anyway.
If you are doing any manual DOM manipulation of Widgets that you have
created (Labels in this case)
What ever type of panel you are attempting to add a widget to, hasn't
overriden the .add(Widget child) method from Panel, so it is throwing
this exception. perhaps there is a different method that you are
supposed to use to add widgets to your panel?
-jason
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:40 PM,
MVC is a good design pattern to use with GWT.
If you are new to GWT, get Ryan Dewsbury's book Google Web Toolkit
Applications it does a very good job of outlining exactly what is
model, view and controller in each example project.
-jason
On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:10 AM, asdf_asdf wrote:
His,
Why not just run hosted mode in java 5? It works just fine.
-jason
On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Gary S wrote:
Soylatte has a 32 bit Intel Java 6 which should allow OS X to run
hosted mode on a Mac.
http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/static/soylatte/#usage
It's a Standard VM and Eclipse
Math.pow(someNumber, 1d/3d); doesn't work for you?
-jason
On Jan 30, 2009, at 4:11 PM, pasqual wrote:
the Math class cube root, Math.cbrt(x), is not implemented in GWT. I
have some JS that works, using the Newton method, but I am wondering
about the best way to add it to the existing JSNI
The 'd' simply declares those numbers to be double rather than integer.
-jason
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:19 AM, pasqual wrote:
good call Jason. i should have remembered that:
pow(x, 1/3) == cbrt(x)
I'm not sure what 'd' represents though.
On Jan 30, 5:51 pm, Jason Essington jason.essing
Well, there are a couple of things to consider ... besides the
possibility of BHOs mucking up the works in your particular install of
IE.
1) Creating a large number of objects can certainly be slow if done in
a tight loop. (for instance populating a very large grid with
widgets). if you
O.K. the compiler spits out pretty much everything that was in a
public path, so expect to see those in the output (www) directory.
in addition you'll likely see some of the following:
[module_name].nocache.js - this is the bootstrap file that loads the
actual GWT module.
[hash].cache.html
it. Would you
let me know the right way. What is it that gets the generated GWT
code to start running on the client side?
Thanks.
-- Russ
On Feb 5, 12:13 pm, Jason Essington jason.essing...@gmail.com wrote:
O.K. the compiler spits out pretty much everything that was in a
public path, so
Just curious, what happens if you return a string, or an int rather
than a long?
longs are emulated in GWT and have been pegged as being a bit slow,
but 1s sure seems like an awful lot.
The other thing to do is pull up FireBug (Firefox), or WebInspector
(WebKit nightly builds) and check
gregor is right, you are trying to perform your update synchronously
but your request is happening asynchronously.
A full explanation of your exact problem can be found in this post:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f/3be719c021aa19bd
On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:51 AM, Rick wrote:
Pinging google.com [74.125.45.100] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=370ms TTL=241
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=354ms TTL=241
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=241
Reply from 74.125.45.100:
Same Origin Policy limits you to making XHRs only to the host (same
server, port, and protocol) where the Host Page was loaded ...
That means if your host page is https://foo.com/index.html and you
load the javascript from http://cache.bar.com/some.js you still have
to make your XHRs to
Why would you need prototype? just use RequestBuilder to fetch the
text, and pass the result into your JSNI eval() ...
-jason
On Feb 12, 2009, at 4:17 PM, jdwyah wrote:
js only I guess you could do an Ajax.Request, but in JSNI you don't
have Prototype..
I dunno, I feel like you're
GWT works great with the iPhone and Android based phones.
however, phones with WAP browsers are unlikely to ever be supported
well due to the lack of any real javascript engine.
I haven't tried the mobile opera browser with GWT but it may work
reasonably well for simple applications
-jason
Well, I've read various articles claiming that IE leaks like a sieve
(don't have any references for you right now, but I'm sure google
could help).
One thing to try is does IE's memory usage come down when you reload
the page, or load a new page?
-jason
On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:44 AM,
Michela
On 23 Feb, 20:55, Jason Essington jason.essing...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, I've read various articles claiming that IE leaks like a
sieve
(don't have any references for you right now, but I'm sure google
could help).
One thing to try is does IE's memory usage come down when you
sure, just return Request (or RequestBuilder, your option) from your
async interface rather than void, and you are good to go.
-jason
On Feb 26, 2009, at 9:56 AM, alex.d wrote:
Hi folks,
Recently i've found myself in a situation where i have to cancel a RPC
call. I've found out that
private void doMove(/*required params*/){
// node move Implementation
}
public void moveQuestion(TreeNode node, TreeNode oldParent, TreeNode
newParent, int index){
// setup
// call rpc
service.resorting(/*params*/, new AsyncCallbackBoolean(){
public void onSuccess(Boolean
indeed, GWT 1.6 does come with 3 different sets of CSS HOWEVER you
would have to import one of the themes in your project to get them
inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.theme.chrome.Chrome'/
For instance.
-jason
On Feb 26, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
I think you have to
Grab Ryan Dewsbury's book Google Web Toolkit Applications one of the
example projects in there shows you exactly how to do that!
-jason
On Mar 1, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Pete Kay wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use GWT to develop a user portal much like the front
page of iGoogle where user can add
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
