Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

I am not aware of anything specific we have done within Google, we never imported the jetty upgrade. I think you just go ahead for open source and make it work there. We do not care that much for htmlunit anymore within Google. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:28 AM Thomas Broyer

[gwt-contrib] Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

Hi all, I spend a considerable amount of time on getting our changes for window.onerror launched in open source: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/gwt/+/18880/ This causes some tests to fail in html unit: http://build.gwtproject.org/job/gwt/972/testReport/ Note: these tests are already

Re: GWT 2.8.1 release

There is some reasoning behind us not broadly announcing elemental2 and the jsinteorp generator: They are both still beta software in the sense that we know there are existing problems, but we already want feedback on them. There are still no guarantees on APIs / compat but if you are brave and

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

? > > How would I call Array.prototype.push.apply(arrayList, value); via > JsInterop? Or if I wanted to add a function to an existing object? > > Thank you, > Marcin > > > On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 20:02:46 UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > >> First of all do not use JSNI going fo

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

First of all do not use JSNI going forward. Use elemental2 (or define your own JSON.parse): Without elemental2: @JsType(isNative=true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL); public class JSON { public static Object parse(String s, Reviver r); } @JsFunction public interface Reviver { public Object

Re: Compilation of a large GWT application?

UTC+3 пользователь Daniel Kurka > написал: > > If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is > accessible in global scope: > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To

Re: Compilation of a large GWT application?

If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is accessible in global scope: Exporting app: package foo; @JsType public Bar { public Baz baz = new Baz(); } Consuming JS: new Bar().baz.baz1(); Consuming gwt app ( No need for -generateJsInteropExports):

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: PROPOSAL: a devserver to replace devmode

I am seeing a lot of arguments pop up about GWT RPC, but I think it should not be considered for this discussion at all. In my mind GWT 2.8 will be the last release that has GWT RPC and people should start migrating. I think its perfectly fine do design a replacement to devmode without GWT RPC

Re: GWT 2.8.0 released

tproject.org for the release? For shame. I'm not being negative; this > is a team that needs more criticism, both internal and external. > > > On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 5:21:41 AM UTC+10, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am very happy to announce GWT 2.8.0 on be

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.8 (final) is released very silent!?

I just sent the announcement to gwt-users that its now final, the reason you could see the tag is that I pushed this as part of our release process. The reason the tag is 17 days old is that its identical with that commit (we have not changed GWT), traditionally we just turn the RC into the final

GWT 2.8.0 released

Hi all, I am very happy to announce GWT 2.8.0 on behalf of the GWT steering committee and the GWT team at Google. You can download the release from http://www.gwtproject.org/download.html or from maven central. The release notes can be found at

Re: Extending native JsTypes from Java with GWT 2.8.0-rc2

If you file a bug please include a simple repro case. In general this seems to be working fine (and is used withing google). So there must be something specific about our particular case. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM Thomas Broyer wrote: > It should be possible, from

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: CodeServer with Bookmarklets not working in GWT 2.7 (2nd request)

This is what recompile on reload is for, you can simply always load: http://[sdmhost]:[sdmport]/recompile-requester/[module] On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:53 PM JonL wrote: > I've had to do this when working on a sdm compiled application in a web > wrapper on ios, instead

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

+Goktug Gokdogan +Roberto Lublinerman Should we be holding RC3, I guess so right? On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:12 PM Jens wrote: > > Can you file an issue and ping Daniel (by mail or hangout) to delay the > RC3 a bit? (if not

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

erfaceValidation workaround mentioned. > > > Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 16:27:36 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Kurka: > > Hi all, > > I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with > any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. > &g

[gwt-contrib] Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Hi all, I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: CalenderUtil Date Math BUG - GWT 2.8 RC2

Does this code do the same thing in 2.7? On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:41 PM Paul Robinson wrote: > You don't say what part of this you think is a bug. I presume it's the > fact that Aug 31 plus one month is Oct 1. If so, this is not a bug. > > Adding one month should do

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: A possible JsInterop issue in GWT 2.8 RC2

Jens is spot on. We want people to explicitly use -generateJsInteropExports if they rely on exporting since it has a hit on code size. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:56 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I believe this is >

GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC2 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble and file bugs . We are planing to release

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC2 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble and file bugs . We are planing to release

Re: GWT 2.7 - MultiModule Setup and SDM recompilation

Even at Google for really large projects recompile times do not exceed 15seconds. So something is wrong in your setup since we only do recompile changed files after the first compile. Are you giving enough ram to SDM? Are you really only changing a few files (or is something else updating

[gwt-contrib] Last call for GWT 2.8.0 RC2

Hi all, I think we have all patches in place for putting out an RC2. If you feel strongly that something should make RC2 please raise this on this thread. I will be cutting RC2 tomorrow PST time. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT

2.8.0 RC1 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC1 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble and file bugs . We are planing to release

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

submitting thomas two fixes and then recutting. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:57 PM Brandon Donnelson wrote: > Where's the link to the GWT 2.8.0-rc1.zip? > > > On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:22:11 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

Hi all, we have build the preliminary GWT 2.8.0-rc1 version and now need help with DOA testing (making sure its not dead on arrival). We are currently missing testers for: Linux / Chrome Windows 7 / IE8/IE9 Windows 7 / IE 10 Windows 7 / IE 11 If you are interested in spending ~1h in testing

Re: GWT RPC in GWT 3.0+

code (taking into account their >> CustomFieldSerializer if one exists). >> RPC (thus probably Atmosphere) could be made to work (as annotation >> processors) if they use another mechanism to determine what can be >> transferred (e.g. annotations similar to RequestFactory's

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

12, 2016 at 8:28 PM Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:06:26 AM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> in the last steering committee meeting we agreed that making the next >> version of Guava

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

Hi all, in the last steering committee meeting we agreed that making the next version of Guava work (which contains a lot of Java8 usage) was the goal for RC1. We have gotten significantly closer to this now and I am happy to report that as of now we pass all of Guavas tests. However there are a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Generator and Linker maintenance and changes

Hi all, thanks for Colin for writing this up. To me this discussion is not so much about the particular feature (enhancing generators), but rather about us making smart choices. We are already struggling to get 2.8 out the door (and making sure it will work with the next version of Guava). So I'd

Re: RAM memory continously increasing while using GWT Application in IE Browser

I vaguely remember fixing a bug around IE10 and tables in GWT. So if that code is using a HtmlTable or FlexTable I suggest upgrading to GWT 2.7 at least. On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM thamarai kannan wrote: > Hi Velusamy sir, > > sorry, I can not share the code.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

With j2cl we do a javac compile up front and thus those basic problems are gone. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:22 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > Agreed - validating supersource is tricky. I've heard of some good options > lately that change how the project interacts with them (like

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Rules for managing issues on GitHub

Nice work Thomas, really appreciated! On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:11 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I started doing some of the things I highlighted in the document: > >- created GitHub milestones and replaced the Milestone-* labels with >assignments to the

Re: GWT no longer working with Chrome 49

About production issue: Are you sure about this? It's less likely to happen in production since many clinit calls will have been stripped by the compiler, but its probably still going to happen. About development: Is there actually a global try catch in your code or is this even something

Re: GWT no longer working with Chrome 49

Hi, Chrome 49 enabled lots of ES6 features, see: http://v8project.blogspot.de/2016/01/v8-release-49.html Part of this is the so called sloppy function hosting. A simple example: ES5 (old semantics) ES2015 (new semantics) Code try { function foo() { foo=function(){};

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Compiler failing with java 7

We have seen issues internally where some code would be a compile error in Java8 but not in Java7 (especially around type checking). This setup will leave users vulnerable to this since their code will compile in their IDE, but will fail GWT compile. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:57 AM Manuel

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

Hi Michael, you are probably missing adding all required source roots to the class pathso that the compiler can find the .java .files. If you go to your Run Configuration under Classpath, hit adavanced and add all required folders At least you should add: dev/core/super/ user/src/ user/super/

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

nts aren't working for me. > > Michael > > On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 7:47:38 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kurka wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> you are probably missing adding all required source roots to the class >> pathso that the compiler can find the .java .files.

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-beta1 available for testing

Hi all, we just finished testing for GWT 2.8.0-beta1. You can either download it from goo.gl/62SeR5 or from maven central. Release notes can be found here . Please start testing and let us know about any issues you

[gwt-contrib] Help testing the GWT 2.8 release

Hi all, the GWT team needs help testing the GWT 2.8.1-beta1 release. As always, before we publicize the release we are doing a bunch of DOA (dead on arrival tests) before we open the release to the broader community. Platforms that need testing: - Chrome (Linux or mac), - Window IE11,

Re: Problem with GWT 2.5.1 + FF 40

This has been fixed in GWT 2.7.0. We refactored the history implementation to not special case Firefox in this particular way. Just updating to GWT 2.7 will fix this issue for you. If that is not possible here is the main patch to make history work: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5356/

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com a écrit : Hi Arnaud, how are you producing these? -Daniel On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Just dumping a bit of errors i get for a project : Tracing compile failure

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

Hi Arnaud, how are you producing these? -Daniel On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Just dumping a bit of errors i get for a project : Tracing compile failure path for type 'java.lang.Object' [INFO] [ERROR] Errors in 'file:

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

As a side note: We had a discussion to make j2cl be able to compile itself to JavaScript. If that is actually done you can easily integrate with all kinds of JavaScript build tools. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:16 PM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've been watching an

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

One other thing: It won't matter which system we use to build the new compiler. Google internal we always use our own build system and since its very close to bazel it should work fine with bazel. If you want some kind of other integration with other build systems you can easily build them since

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Stop calling it GWT 3.0

Hi all, thanks for sharing your views in this discussion. Let me add a little background: Currently we the GWT team have decided to work on a new fast transpiler from Java to Closure (our internal enhanced version of JavaScript). This makes sense for a lot of reasons that I won't go into detail

Re: [gwt-contrib] A new library to integrate GWT with any CSS Framework

Hi Arnaud, great work! Have you considered using a APT generator instead of hooking into the old GWT Generator API? -Daniel On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I come up here to let you know about a library i build, aiming at

Re: [gwt-contrib] How to include changesets to an existing gerrit review?

You make the changes in your local git client and amend the commit: 'git commit --amend' Then you just push to gerrit: 'git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master' and this will update the review. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've

Re: [gwt-contrib] com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver cannot be compiled with java6

Yes the readme needs to be updated. Trunk does not support java6 anymore. Mind sending a patch? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi team, I've just imported gwt-dev in Eclipse and I saw there is only one class that doesn't compile:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8: Turn GSS on by default

I agree with Goktug on this one. We can remove it from trunk right after we created the 2.8 release branch, depending on how other things come together (Java8, JSInterop v1) this should be in ~2 months. I think we are fine letting the old code sit for that while. I would suggest that we switch

Re: [gwt-contrib] Javascript Exceptions in SDM about classes not being defined

This looks like the same compiler bug we are currently investigating, for now you can clear your SDM cache (button on its page) and you should be able to continue. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Ali Akhtar ali.rac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT, from

Re: [gwt-contrib] What constitutes an acceptable emulated String.format implementation?

Hi Benjamin, thanks for reaching out to us. Answers are inline. On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Benjamin DeLillo bpd9...@gmail.com wrote: For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire Java Formater spec?

Re: [gwt-contrib] Where do I find my password for gerrit?

Here is how you do it: 1. Go to http://gwt-review.googlesource.com 2. Upper left corner press on the arrow right of our login name 3. Press preferences 4. Press HTTP Password 5. Press Obtain password -Daniel On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for

Singular (Angular for crossplatform) talk at GWT.create

Hi all, here is me talking about Singular at GWT.create: http://gwtcreate.com/videos/index.html#singular -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [gwt-contrib] Compile error with latest gwt (from trunk)

Are you sure that there is not another version of GWT somewhere in the classpath? On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Stefano Pulze stefano.pulz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Today I've updated and build latest gwt from trunk. I've tried to compile my project but the compilar said: Caused by:

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Luca, we are intentionally not deploying right now, but we will eventually sort this out. I am sorry but we do not have an ETA for that. -Daniel On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:20 PM, luca.masini luca.mas...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone take the time to fix the problem with the CI system that

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Build server is down

This is a known thing and we can't change that for a short period of time. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Update: it's not down (as it built this night), just unreachable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Generators vs java annotation processing

I will be presenting something around that at GWT.create - http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: GWT itself won't run annotation processors (yet), but if your IDE runs

Re: [gwt-contrib] Incremental Scheduler can be about 10% faster

I think we do not want to make any assumptions about runtime of any tasks since this would not work well with task that have variable runtime. If you need to do heavy calculations since browser APIs have evolved a lot you should be using web workers anyway. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:57 AM,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

I am really curious why this is not working for you in the first place. Since the code we added to SDM should always scope you down to one permutation. Are you still using bookmarklets? (These do not deal with this properly and should not be used anymore). On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Rob

GWT 2.7.0 is here

Today we are excited to announce the GWT 2.7.0 release. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release, especially our non-Google open source contributors. One major feature of this release is a new super fast compilation path in Super Dev mode that replaces the old dev mode. For a

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM memory footprint

Hi Nicolas, Having no-op recompiles taking ~30s is very uncommon, even on our large projects this never exceeds 1s. Right now there is not much you can do to trim down memory usage for SDM. It really needs this amount of memory. Also keep in mind that SDM slows down a lot if it comes close to the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

On the run rght now, but john merged a patch in that area yesterday, can you try reverting that one? On Friday, November 14, 2014, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I've updated my master branch (of the GWT-core project) the with the remote and now I'm not able to run any GWT test

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

Deleted all unit caches? On Nov 14, 2014 1:10 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I have this problem for several days in fact. It's why I think the problem is on my side. On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 1:05:30 PM 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM in 2.7.0-rc1 doesn't support inclusion in 3rd party sites

Can you take a look at this and let me know if this helps you out? https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tal Shani tsh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am writing a GWT generated JS script that is hosted by several sites. 2.7.0 introduced a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

or SDM compiles? Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 10:32:39 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

I added a tracking item for updating SDM docs before 2.7.0 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Matic Petek maticpe...@gmail.com wrote: Jens, Thank you. Now it's working. SDM documentation should really be updated - http://www.gwtproject.org/articles/superdevmode.html Regards, Matic On

Re: GWT 2.7.0 RC1 available

There is no need to start the codeserver directly anymore, its now started by default when you launch the old dev mode. And you do not need to use the bookmarklets in that mode anymore. It just recompiles automatically. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpCSbj36O44 On Thursday, October 30,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cell widgets and GSS

I think we should not provide these files as of yet. If someone wants to make the transition right now they can easily use the converter with these files and convert them to gss themselves. I think we want to make that transition once GSS is default (or about to be default) inside of Google as a

GWT 2.7.0 RC1 available

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.7.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here http://goo.gl/npqEUR. Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.7.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here http://goo.gl/npqEUR. Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0-RC1 Smoke testing update

Hi all, the smoke testing for the release showed up a couple of problems, some of them need to be fixed before we put RC1 out others can wait until the final release. - Dev mode test do not work: issue 8967 https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8967 - Smoke

[gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

Hi all, right now GWT builds with RC1 are failing in Eclipse with GPE since the gwt-codeserver.jar is not on the build path. The next GPE release (with changes that fix this) is still a long way out. In order to not be blocking on this I propose we fold gwt-codeserver.jar into gwt-dev.jar. This

Re: [gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

I think moving sources right now is too risky and too much work we should just merge the jars in dist. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Fine for me. Do you intend to move the sources or just merge the JARs during dist-dev/dist? -- You received this

[gwt-contrib] Help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1

Hi all, we are looking for help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1. We are in need of people testing the release on these platforms (others are already covered): - Windows 7/8, IE10 - some Windows, IE8 Please reach out to me directly if you want to get involved. -Daniel -- Google Germany GmbH

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

to reload the page even when nothing has changed, but I guess it would be faster with a ssd drive. Le lundi 20 octobre 2014 16:51:19 UTC+2, Daniel Kurka a écrit : With GWT 2.7 you do not need any bookmarklet stuff anymore. You can just bring it up through the old dev mode integration in eclipse

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

: com.exalead.mercury.admin.ui.AdminFront_1_6 skipped compile because no input files have changed * 2,782s total -- Compile completed* Jeremie Le mardi 21 octobre 2014 10:48:54 UTC+2, Daniel Kurka a écrit : Hi Jeremie, what do you mean by 15s reload? Does the compiler take 15s to detect

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

/messenger/ccs/genovoice/event/impl/JsoEventFactory.java' [ERROR] Line 38: Rebind result 'de.gad.wap.pgu.messenger.ccs.genovoice.event.call.DialEvent_JsoEvt' cannot be a JSO Cheers, Jan Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2014 19:54:40 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Hi all, since we

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

With GWT 2.7 you do not need any bookmarklet stuff anymore. You can just bring it up through the old dev mode integration in eclipse, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpCSbj36O44 PS: You do not need the -superDevMode anymore its now default. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jérémie Gottero

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: odd super dev mode times

Stephen can you verify that this solved your problem and if so cherry pick it to the branch and add me as a reviewer? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:02 PM, 'John Stalcup' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: I think it's in master now (commit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: odd super dev mode times

I think that CL is only on master. Thats why I said try master and if it works send me a cherry pick for the CL :) On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: However, right, it didn't actually make it into 2.7-beta1. Crap. Eclipse was lying to me,

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Hi all, since we are adding major features to GWT, we decided to change our release process for GWT 2.7. I just published GWT 2.7.0-beta1 to maven central and our file storage http://goo.gl/pr7km3. We are doing this beta to get external feedback on incremental compilation and GSS. Incremental

[gwt-contrib] Maven release process broken

Hi all, apparently sonatype now verifies that all jar files have a sources.jar associated with them. Our build does not do that for gwt-servlet.jar. To be able to push out beta1 I settled on a nasty hack, see: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9774/ I think we need to change the way the

[gwt-contrib] Java6 compatibility broken due to UiBinder change for GSS

Hi all, currently GWT does not build with Java6 (not even the release build: ant elemental dist), because of this change: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9620/ @Colin, @Arthur can you guys take a look together with Julien? -Daniel -- You received this message because you are

[gwt-contrib] Change packaging for GSS

Hi all, apparently we ended up packaging gss into gwt-dev instead of gwt-user: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9803/ @Thomas, @Julien can you guys look into providing a patch that moves this into gwt-user? -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

) On Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:54:40 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kurka wrote: Hi all, since we are adding major features to GWT, we decided to change our release process for GWT 2.7. I just published GWT 2.7.0-beta1 to maven central and our file storage http://goo.gl/pr7km3. We are doing this beta

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Maven release process broken

oops was still a draft, now its okay. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote: The patch link provided is bad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Did you sign the CLA on the gerrit web interface? -Daniel On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Scott Morgan sc...@adligo.com wrote: Hi, Ok I had issues with the ~/.netrc file, which never authenticated me. So I removed it to get command line user/password dialogs which did this; (Replaced

Re: [gwt-contrib] GssParserException

Did you update your svn tools dir? On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Stefano Pulze stefano.pulz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've a problem with GssParserException when try compile from GWT trunk version. I've download latest GWT trunk versione from the web and start to compiling with ant

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 remaining actions - Invitation to view

I've shared an item with you: GWT 2.7 remaining actions https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17enrlrtsmdJTX7nTumJJwCyJkas8kF8TddvbWH7-Ebw/edit?usp=sharing It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click the link above. -- You received this message because you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 release plan

We are making steady progress towards GWT 2.7. At this point we are not accepting any new patches, but we still have a list of issues that we would like to include in the upcoming release. This is no guarantee that all of them are going to make it but we are trying our best. Also we are holding

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 release plan

authority to decide whether the changes are wanted. On Thursday, 9 October 2014 16:25:37 UTC+3, Daniel Kurka wrote: We are making steady progress towards GWT 2.7. At this point we are not accepting any new patches, but we still have a list of issues that we would like to include in the upcoming

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Code for GSS support (GssResource) pushed. Please review.

Hi all, summarizing the discussion I just had with Julien: We want to have the in memory conversion in GWT 2.7 (even if it is not battle tested yet), since this is the way to move foward. We can even do a followup release (2.8) as soon as google is using it in production and we sorted all

[gwt-contrib] Last call for patches

Hi all, as a reminder: Please make sure to get your patches in for GWT 2.7 until tomorrow (October 7th). -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [gwt-contrib] bug with the new snapshot

Hi Julien, I think this is related to us not waiting for the body to be loaded before injecting the recompile.nocache.js. Can you try: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9451/ and let me know if this fixes your issue? -Daniel On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Julien Dramaix

GWT incremental compiles in action

Hi all, here is a small video of GWT incremental compiles in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpCSbj36O44feature=youtu.be -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop

Make sure turn turn on -XjsInteropMode JS -Daniel On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:03 PM, 'John Stalcup' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Make sure turn turn on -XjsInteropMode JS On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:18 AM, 'Chris DiGiano' via GWT Contributors

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 release plan

Hi all, we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan: - We *code freeze* on *October 7th* and branch for GWT 2.7. - As soon as we have the *remaining patches submitted*, we put out a beta1 build, this should be no later than *October 7th.* - Putting out a *beta1 externally* allows us to collect

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >